Live Breaking News & Updates on Ego Couldn T Stand
Stay updated with breaking news from Ego couldn t stand. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
this is america s newsroom. so finally the prosecution will rest its case. after the jury took a field trip to the crime scene. they toured the kennels where they say alex murdered his son and wife. he told investigators he wasn t near there. he had to reverse that story on the hand. they paint him as a serial liar with the means, motive and opportunity. this defendant, on the other hand, has fooled everyone everyone, everyone who thought they were close to him and everyone who thought they knew who he was. he has fooled them all. and he fooled maggie and paul, too. and they paid for it with their lives. dana: team fox coverage. nancy grace is here with analysis. let s begin with jonathan serrie in atlanta to set the scene for us. good morning, dana and bill. in their closing arguments, the defense for alex murdaugh are expected to push their theory that perhaps two shooters were involved with the murders of maggie and paul murdaugh and that the initial crim ....
questions, ladies and gentlemen. raise more questions that we wouldn t have to be dealing with if they had simply secured maggie s phone on june 8th when they got it, we wouldn t be here. so we do know from the timeline that alex left the property at 9:07. were they killed before he left? y don t know the answer to that. i don t know the answer to that. we do know if he was in the house when the shots were made down at the kennel, that he would not have heard them. we had decibel testing from mr. sutton. they were angry with mr. suttons test, not angry, challenged his conclusion on many things, they didn t touch his acoustic testing. didn t doubt that, haven t challenged that. if he s in the house, and shots are ringing down at the kennel, he doesn t hear them. he doesn t hear them. now they say that sometime after 8:44, and they peg it 8:48, 8:50, that is when paul last responded to a text from this friend of his, they ignore the fact there had to be clean-up. buster t ....
Inside that south carolina courtroom where you see alex murdaugh, so we re going to break away from that double-murder trial for just a moment to figure out the technology of bringing that picture live back to you. we have ways to monitor it. we can hear it. in the meantime, if anything pops, we can tell you what is said inside the courtroom. in the meantime, emily, when you look at yesterday compared to today and yesterday went on forever with the closing arguments from the prosecution, how would you compare the two substance wise? emily: both are focused on the who and why and difference in prosecution closing arguments and here midway through the defense closing arguments, near the end is import placed on the circumstantial evidence that points toward both. for example, in the middle of there was behavior of the defendant after the time of the killings. his attorney is saying is this evidence of guilt or trauma? ....
Talking about motive and lack of understanding of rationale, normal people, why you would hurt your family. that is why the prosecution has been hammering the who, that primarily what matters is who and secondarily is why. it is unfathomable to us to think about killing a loved one, they talk about shame. the prosecution closed by saying shame is an extraordinary provocation for this person, his ego couldn t stand that and he became a family anilator. great lengths to discuss the purpose this family thought they had, entrenched history in the county. the grandfather had his portrait hanging in this courtroom, trey gowdy worked with their dad. the taint on that family already existed, it wasn t well kept secret there were flies in the ointment and in that county, ....
Say this man is guilty of murder, i would struggle so much. i d be like this man is so bad, did he do this beyond a reasonable doubt, i don t know if i m there that is what the prosecution was arguing, they said why would someone encountering their family annihilated for the first time within 17 seconds be able to call 911 and articulate what alex did, he knew what he was coming home to, they say if he was heading to his mom s house, why was he driving at such excessive speed? we have beauty of forensics here, of technology. why engage in 9000 steps in 40 seconds, numbers that show they argue utmost panic, running around. harris: and on the phone, was he pacing? he touched his neck, why was the white shirt free of blood? ....