do you need help, sir? can you show the document that i have on the laptop there? basically i just want you to take a peek at this. this just came out by jeff kaczynski and his group. basically what it is saying is that the people that go into the navigation center, they are only going to house 5%, so just consider that. 95% of the people who go to the navigation center are not going to get housed. the limited stay, let me see, the end of stay, 30 1% choose to exit by choice. forty-one%, are the navigations really that bad where 41% of the people who actually go there would actually leave? that is what jeff kaczynski s numbers imply. san francisco administrative code 106 says that the controller is supposed to provide reports involving the navigation centers and i don t have any to date. also consider the denial of service. 10% the navigation centers that were built, they were viable, not the best, but somewhat viable. what jeff kaczynski is doing is illegal. look at the
but what it means is it creates an allowance of time for people to exit from the building. it means that a fire that occurs in the building is less likely to spread to an adjacent building or vice versa. if fire occurs in an adjacent building, it may not be able to make it to the building you re in. at least within that one-hour period of time. i have one more question: this site permit process, if i may ask we talk roughly about the side permit process. and planning now see it as a lot more work that has to be done, plan check. do we have really any understanding how much more work and plan check is going to be created by, you know, basically removing the side permitting process, as we know it as it is today? i m going to turn this over to cyril yu, and he would probably have a better answer for you. and as quick as you can, cyril, if you can we don t know how many revisions there are. it occurs during the site permit. they establish the building envelope. so i m
inspection commission. [roll call] very good. commissioners, we have one item, item one for case 218-02728 for the controlled demolition merger conversion and alterations. this is an informational meeting. before you start, i wanted to go through for a couple of things of how this is going to go this morning. good morning and welcome to our commissioners. i missed many of you. so what we are going to try to do is have this is a very complicated piece of legislation, and folks have a lot of opinion about the different aspects of it. we, the president mccarthy and i, want to give as much time to the public to opine. so with that being said, we only have a limited time. so what i m going to ask first is that there is going to be times after each section that staff can pause and allow for commissioner questions. i beg my fellow commissioners to ask questions of clarification only. let s leave the comments to the end. so please keep your questions short and succinct, so we c
but what it means is it creates an allowance of time for people to exit from the building. it means that a fire that occurs in the building is less likely to spread to an adjacent building or vice versa. if fire occurs in an adjacent building, it may not be able to make it to the building you re in. at least within that one-hour period of time. i have one more question: this site permit process, if i may ask we talk roughly about the side permit process. and planning now see it as a lot more work that has to be done, plan check. do we have really any understanding how much more work and plan check is going to be created by, you know, basically removing the side permitting process, as we know it as it is today? i m going to turn this over to cyril yu, and he would probably have a better answer for you. and as quick as you can, cyril, if you can we don t know how many revisions there are. it occurs during the site permit. they establish the building envelope. so i m
we actually do like the location because of the convenience. at the time we were living there , i do not own a car, so we proposed not to have a garage. we do like the neighborhood because the convenience for groceries and also other amenities. as well as the neighborhood. my two daughters would like to go there for school. lastly, we would like to build the structure where we would [indiscernible] we are also striving for a rating for the building. along with the architect, we chose to do a study to the building itself to enhance the neighborhood. i guess we would like to request your commission to approve the project. thank you. thank you. now we will open this up to the public. are there any members of the public would like to comment? come on up. hello, my name is dan waters. i submitted the photos online. i apologize for my lateness. i did not have a lot of time to see the plans and make a determination on how this would be impacted. we talked with sam a number of