We will and with a brief rebuttal from mr. Flynns counsel and the council of United States. Please proceed. Thank you chief judge, may it please the court, general flynn is a defendant without a prosecutor, and litigation without controversy between the parties to the case. Instead of granting dismissal as required as a matter of law, John Sullivan denied defense motions, appointed mr. Gleason to usurp the job of the prosecutor, raised perjury but as iter his head, was noted, the job of United States attorney is occupied. Adding the unconstitutional burdens of process to punish michael flynn, John Sullivan discarded any semblance of the adjudicator. As a cornerstone of any system of justice worth the label. Required. Gs are judge sullivans position for rehearing must be flatly denied with language that a judge has no injury or standing to seek relief in this court. Sullivan has invested himself in the prosecution of general flynn, it is mandated disqualification for the glaring appeara
This morning on washington journal we take a look at the Michael Flynn perjury case that was reheard yesterday i the d. C. Circuit judge court of police judge court of appeals. Good morning, its wednesday, august 12, 2020. Yesterday afternoon joe biden named Kamala Harris as his running mate in the 2020 election. The 55yearold daughter of jamaican and indian immigrants becomes the first lap woman in first asianamerican to run for Vice President on a major party ticket. This morning we are getting your reaction. Phone lines are open to let us know your thoughts. Republicans can call in this ,orning at 202 7488001 democrats 202 7488000, 202 7488002. You can send us a tax that 202 7488002 a text at 202 7488002. Good wednesday morning to you. You can go ahead and talk calling him right now as we show you how the joe biden for Kamala Harris played out on the front pages of several Major National papers. This is the front page of the Washington Post. A historic move. Ine first woman of color
Down a review of the flynn case. I wonder your reading of the judges reactions and interactions with the lawyer. Guest anytime you are in front of one judge, it is difficult as an attorney, to be in front of multiple judges at the Appellate Court level, that is a challenge. I have been there, and you dont know which question is coming, and sometimes i have had judges that i thought were absolutely against my position and gave me the hardest time in the courtroom, and i left very disappointed only to find out later that they actually agreed with me, but we were testing the parameters of the argument but they were testing the parameters of the argument. I would think any lawyer in front of the court certainly have to take a step back and watch and see what happens. There are some incredible he thoughtful judges on this panel. You look at merrick garland, and i expect he is one that does not put politics in front of his role to assess the facts and the law. I am interested to see what wil
Yesterday do you think the Attorney Sidney Powell did to make needed to do her case before that panel of judges yesterday . Look. It is a difficult case if your focus is simply on the politics of the matter. But if you are looking at the law on the facts in the case, i think she has the stronger side of the facts given that the executive branch is the one that should be determining whether a case goes forward or not. Systemic headline from the Washington Post this morning judges skeptical of shutting down a review of the flynn case. I wonder your reading of the judges reaction and their interaction with the lawyers yesterday . Anytime you are in front of one judge it is difficult as an attorney. But to beip in front of multiple judges at the Appellate Court level that is certainly a challenge. I have been there. You dont know which question is coming, sometimes ive had judges thatns i thought were absently against my position that gave me the hardest time in thehe courtroom. And i left
The washington journal this morning. We send you over to live coverage of the d. C. Circuit court of appeals. [captioning performed by the national captioning institute, which is responsible for its caption content and accuracy. Visit ncicap. Org] [captions Copyright National cable satellite corp. 2020] these adding unconstitutional burdens of process to punish michael flynn, judge sullivan discarded any semblance of an impartial adjudicator that he had been extolled. As the cornerstone of any system of justice worth the label. Four rulings are required to conclude this article. The judges position must be flatly denied with clear language the judge has no standing to seek relief in this because hee ruling has invested himself in his prosecution of general flynn, there is now a glaring appearance of bias to millions of citizens. Requires the vacation of and forth, they must compel the District Court to grant the dismissal as a matter of law. Only department of justice can decide the Pu