Live Breaking News & Updates on District Court Grant

Stay updated with breaking news from District court grant. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.

Transcripts For CSPAN2 Trump V. Mazars Oral Argument 20240712

Valid and the president appealed and now the case is before the appeals court. Thank you, judge. Oyea oyea oyea, all person having business before the United States court of appeals for the District Of Columbia circuit are admonished to draw near and give attention, god save the United States and Honorable Courts. 195142, donald j. Trump,et al, and [inaudible] mr. Norris. Good morning. Good morning, your honor. May it please the court. In april of 2019 when the Oversight Committee issued this subpoena to mazars it had an extraordinarily broad view of its own investigative authority. According to the committee, the power to subpoena the president s personal papers was could he extensive with the power ....

New York , United States , District Of Columbia , United States Court , Court Appeals , Oversight Committee , Supreme Court , Supreme Court Case , Court Case , Court Announced , Court Reject , Committee Says , Court Limited , District Court , Court Better , Law Court , Court Court , Court Review , District Courts , Legal Standard , Committee Said , Court Just , Court Say , Supreme Court Decision , Court Decision , Current Record ,

Transcripts For CSPAN Trump V. Mazars Oral Argument 20240712

Supreme court. The justices remanded the case back to the lower courts for additional consideration, including separation of powers concerns. Oyea oyea oyea, all person having business before the United States court of a good morning. Good morning, your honor. May it please the court. In april of 2019 when the Oversight Committee issued this subpoena to mazars it had an extraordinarily broad view of its own investigative authority. According to the committee, the power to subpoena the president s personal papers was could he extensive with the power to legislate and did not have to give any reasons or explanation with what legislative goals its pursuing and had no duty to meaningful narrow or tailor its request. That view of its own authority is reflected in the subpoena which is drafted in incredibly broad terms and substantiated with little more than a sentence, a vague ....

New York , United States , District Of Columbia , New Hampshire , Amy Coney Barrett , Jimmy Carter , Nancy Pelosi , United States Court , Oversight Committee , Supreme Court , Supreme Court Case , Court Case , Court Announced , Standard Committee , Committee Never , Court Reject , Committee Says , Court Limited , District Court , Court Better , Law Court , Court Court , Court Review , District Courts , Legal Standard , Committee Said ,

Transcripts For CSPAN Trump V. Mazars Oral Argument 20240712

May it please the court. In april of 2019 when the Oversight Committee issued this subpoena to mazars it had an extraordinarily broad view of its own investigative authority. According to the committee, the power to subpoena the president s personal papers was could he extensive with the power to legislate and did not have to give any reasons or explanation with what legislative goals its pursuing and had no duty to meaningful narrow or tailor its request. That view of its own authority is reflected in the subpoena which is drafted in incredibly broad terms and substantiated with little more than a sentence, a vague sentence in a memo about legislation. But the committees view of its own authority was rejected by the Supreme Court in this case 90. The Court Announced a new test that substantially restricts congresss ....

New York , United States , North Carolina , District Of Columbia , Scott Taylor , Jimmy Carter , Kamala Harris , Oversight Committee , Supreme Court , Supreme Court Case , Court Case , Court Announced , Standard Committee , Committee Never , Court Reject , Committee Says , Court Limited , District Court , Court Better , Law Court , Court Court , Court Review , District Courts , Legal Standard , Committee Said , Court Just ,

Transcripts For CSPAN Trump V. Mazars Oral Argument 20240712

All persons having business before the honorable the United States court of appeals for the District Of Columbia circuit are admonished to draw near and give their attention, for the court is now sitting. God save the United States in this honorable court. Case number 1954. Oversighttrump versus and reform of the u. S. House of representatives. Good morning. May it please the court. In april of 2019, when the Oversight Committee issued this subpoena, it had an extraordinarily broad view of its own investigative authority. According to the committee, the power of the subpoena subpoena the president s personal papers is coextensive with the power to legislate. Ordid not to give any reason legislation and it had no duty to tailor its request. That view of its ....

New York , United States , North Carolina , South Dakota , District Of Columbia , Moore Mccormack , Jimmy Carter , Joe Biden , George Mcgovern , Honorable United States Court , United States Court , Court Appeals , Oversight Committee , Supreme Court , Supreme Court Case , Court Case , Court Reject , District Court , Court Better , District Court Application , Court Application , Legal Standard , Supreme Court Decision , Court Decision , Court Just , Court Say ,

Transcripts For CSPAN2 Oral Argument On Michael Flynn Perjury Dismissal Case 20240712

Flynn is a defendant without a prosecutor and litigation now without any controversy between the actual parties to the case. Instead of promptly granting dismissal as required as a matter of law, judge sullivan denied two defense motioning opposing any amicus at all, appointed mr. Gleeson to usurp the job of prosecutor, and went forth to right theening wrotes he perceived. To right the wrongs he perceived. The job of the United States attorney is otherwise occupied. In adding these unconstitutional burdens of process to punish Michael Flynn, judge sullivan discarded any semblance of the unbiased, impartial adjudicator this court extolled in the 2019 chapter of that case saga. As a cornerstone of any system of justice worth the label. Four rulings are required to conclude this novel article three excess. Judge sullivans petition for rehearing must be flatly denied with clear lan ....

United States , Robin Kelly , Hutchinson Michael , Nunnally Cheney , Henry David Thoreau , Malcolm Gladwell , Mister Walsh , William Barr , United States Attorney , District Court , District Court Grant , Court Grant , Department Justice , Public Interest , Factual Development , Branch Sole , District Courts , Services Course , Court Agrees , Motion District Court , Case District Court , Court Set , District Court Grants , Court Grants , District Court Ruled , Court Ruled ,