Project 2025 tax project 2025 tax plan would cut taxes for households making more than 10 million a year. By an average of 2. 4 million a year. Which is great news, for the hyper wealthy. But what about for the rest of us . This is a visualization of the added tax burden for these middleclass married couples with two children under project 2025 tax plan. Families by that description that make anywhere between 35,000 a year and 175 a year would all see their taxes go up. A married couple making a collective 80,000 a year would see nearly 2000 more in federal taxes a year. The same is true for single americans. Every american making between 75 and 85,000 a year would see their taxes go up. There is a very good reason that donald trump claims to have nothing to do with project 2025 every time hes asked. Now, compare the nonsense in here to Vice President harriss tax proposal. At the core of the proposal is a continuation of the Biden Administration promise that no one making less than 400
It is tuesday, so i must be talking about, you guessed it, project 2025. Digging through this 900page tome is my work until election day. Then theres this other part, cutting taxes for corporations and the wealthiest among us. Now, today the progressive think tank, center for American Progress, released an analysis of what project 2025s tax plan would actuallys look like for Americas Bank accounts if trump enacted it. The top lines in this thing are amazing. According to the center for American Progress project 2025s tax plan would cut taxes for households making more than 10 million a year by an average of 2. 4 million a year, which is great news for the hyperwealthy, but what about for the rest of america . Check out this chart. This is a visualization of the added tax burdensu for a middle class a married couple with two c children under project 2025s tax plan. Under the plan families by that description that make anywhere between 35,000 a year and 170,000 a year would all see their
Until election day. I have read it to you do not have to. It has plans for every aspect of the federal government, mostly shrinking it except where it allows the government to control the lives of the citizens. And then there s this other part about cutting taxes for corporations and the wealthiest. Today center for american progress released an analysis of what project 2025 tax plan would actually look like for america s bank accounts it trump enacted it. Top lines are amazing. According to them, the tax plan would cut taxes for households making more than $10 million a year. By an average of $2. 4 million a year. That s great news for the hyper wealthy. What about the rest of america? this is a visualization of the added tax burden for a middle class a married couple with two children under plan. Families by that description that make $35,000 a year and $170,000 a year would all see taxes go up. For example a married couple making $80,000 a year would see nearly $2000 more in federal
Flynn is a defendant without a prosecutor and litigation now without any controversy between the actual parties to the case. Instead of promptly granting dismissal as required as a matter of law, judge sullivan denied two defense motioning opposing any amicus at all, appointed mr. Gleeson to usurp the job of prosecutor, and went forth to right theening wrotes he perceived. To right the wrongs he perceived. The job of the United States attorney is otherwise occupied. In adding these unconstitutional burdens of process to punish Michael Flynn, judge sullivan discarded any semblance of the unbiased, impartial adjudicator this court extolled in the 2019 chapter of that case saga. As a cornerstone of any system of justice worth the label. Four rulings are required to conclude this novel article three excess. Judge sullivans petition for rehearing must be flatly denied with clear language that a judge has no injury and no standing to seek relief of this courts rulings. Because judge sullivan
We will and with a brief rebuttal from mr. Flynns counsel and the council of United States. Please proceed. Thank you chief judge, may it please the court, general flynn is a defendant without a prosecutor, and litigation without controversy between the parties to the case. Instead of granting dismissal as required as a matter of law, John Sullivan denied defense motions, appointed mr. Gleason to usurp the job of the prosecutor, raised perjury but as iter his head, was noted, the job of United States attorney is occupied. Adding the unconstitutional burdens of process to punish michael flynn, John Sullivan discarded any semblance of the adjudicator. As a cornerstone of any system of justice worth the label. Required. Gs are judge sullivans position for rehearing must be flatly denied with language that a judge has no injury or standing to seek relief in this court. Sullivan has invested himself in the prosecution of general flynn, it is mandated disqualification for the glaring appeara