i had little input into that inquiry. i was there on the day of the interview but any pre or post work would have been by the person in charge of the inquiry. i5 person in charge of the inquiry. is a you had nothing to do with endorsing the content of the report? no. , ., endorsing the content of the report? no. , . , ., , no. diane matthews told the inquiry that she was no. diane matthews told the inquiry that she was shocked no. diane matthews told the inquiry that she was shocked when - no. diane matthews told the inquiry that she was shocked when janet . that she was shocked when janet skinner was charged with theft. where you? this skinner was charged with theft. where you? skinner was charged with theft. where ou? a , where you? as i say, miss matthews is the one who where you? as i say, miss matthews is the one who sourced where you? as i say, miss matthews is the one who sourced it. where you? as i say, miss matthews is the one who sourced it. i - where you
Bugs disclosed that i became aware ofthem. ~. ,. Of them. We looked already at the December 2010 of them. We looked already at the December 2010 email of them. We looked already at the December 2010 email by of them. We looked already at the December 2010 email by which. Of them. We looked already at the December 2010 email by which email December 2010 e mail by which e mail you were December 2010 e mail by which e mail you were notified of the receipts and payments . | you were notified of the receipts and payments . And payments . I was notified in december and payments . I was notified in December 2010 . And payments . I was notified in December 2010 . | and payments . I was notified in December 2010 . I wasnt. And payments . I was notified in December 2010 . Iwasnt. I and payments . I was notified in | December 2010 . Iwasnt. I dont recall that. The document you took me to which was the record of the discussion, i was not aware of that at the time. Discussion, i was not aware of th
System . Obviously, she knew that i had the west byfleet case and we would have just dealt with our own cases, really. I dont think that would have been much cross about where you work with your case, so to speak. But, yes, from this e mail, you can see that the Expert Witness bubbly was going to be needed, but you tended to just focus on your own case and you would not really have time or get into too much detail discussing other cases with other investigators. Flan discussing other cases with other investigators discussing other cases with other investigators. Discussing other cases with other investiuators. ,. ,. , investigators. Can we please look at oll investigators. Can we please look at poll 00167138. Investigators. Can we please look at poll 00167138, please . Investigators. Can we please look at poll 00167138, please . Around investigators. Can we please look at poll 00167138, please . Around the | poll 00167138, please . Around the similar time a few days later, if we could
Suggested that he was not aware that the post office was able to prosecute subpostmasters, individuals that work for the organisation. That was the most striking moment because he was Managing Directorfor several years. Because he was Managing Directorfor severalyears. During because he was Managing Directorfor several years. During that time, there were hundreds of prosecutions against Sub Postmasters and after establishing at the beginning of his testimony how important that was, that he was running the business, he then said that he just didnt even know that these prosecutions were being brought forward by the post office, that there was no independent body, no review as to whether those decisions made sense and he realises that two thirds of those cases, those decisions, were being taken by the post office owe you wonder that how is it when youve seen these documents that are going to him, talking about these criminal cases, that he didnt understand as the man in the top job that t
Statement from the company saying that because it carried out that refurbishment. It is worth telling you what the company is saying. They are shocked to hear of the devastating fire. Their immediate thoughts are with everyone affected and going on to see the complete a refurbishment of the building in the Summer Refurbishment of the building in the summer of 2016 for the organisation which runs this residential tower block. It is run by Kensington And Chelsea tenant management 0rganisation. It carried out the refurbishment for that organisation on behalf of the council. And it goes on to see this met all required building control, Fire Regulation, and health and safety standards. They will cooperate with all Emergency Services and authorities and support enquiries into the cause of the fire. Given the ongoing nature of this incident it would be inappropriate to comment further at this stage. But the crucial line in that statement saying, as far as rydon is concerned that met all Fire