on the other. and those only finally got resolved at the very start of april with the cdc evidence. fin got resolved at the very start of april with the cdc evidence. on the 11th of march april with the cdc evidence. on the 11th of march at april with the cdc evidence. on the 11th of march at a april with the cdc evidence. on the 11th of march at a cabinet april with the cdc evidence. on the 11th of march at a cabinet meeting, l 11th of march at a cabinet meeting, you saidm iith of march at a cabinet meeting, you said. unless 11th of march at a cabinet meeting, you said. unless individuals - 11th of march at a cabinet meeting, you said. unless individuals were| you said. unless individuals were symptomatic. you said. unless individuals were symptomatic, there you said. unless individuals were symptomatic, there was you said. unless individuals were symptomatic, there was no - you said. unless individuals were symptomatic, there was no point l you said. unles
were having to do things that in future ought to be done by other departments or at the centre because it should have been a whole government response earlier. that is my reflection. and what about after the end of february when the cross government machine ramps up on the scale of the crisis is understood and steps have to be taken? to what extent had the department for health and social are got on top of promoting or suggesting the sort of countermeasures and infection control that ultimately were at the heart of the government response? from the end of february when the prime minister took the chair of cobra which was symbolically very important, when the chancellor of the duchy of lancaster got stuck in and you heard from him how he came to a cobra, was alarmed, asked some very good questions, followed that “p very good questions, followed that up with me and from. you might thinki up with me and from. you might think i was unhappy to receive that e mail on those questi
seems irrational, but before you remove it, you need to understand why it might have been put there and that applies in other government departments. don t immediately rush to change things before understanding why they were there. as you say, while i was chancellor of the duchy of lancaster i became increasingly aware of the need for change and then as minister for the cabinet office i sought quickly to familiarise myself with those aspects of the operation of cabinet office that i had not been directly responsible for beforehand and became even more seized of the need for change in how it went. you became even more seized of the need for change in how it went. for change in how it went. you are not suggesting for change in how it went. you are not suggesting that for change in how it went. you are not suggesting that this not suggesting that this functionality if revealed in the heart of a government department is something that should not be addressed? something th
not pass it on. there is a different thing again. actually quite an important distinction.- thing again. actually quite an important distinction. when you have a dress that as important distinction. when you have a dress that as well. important distinction. when you have a dress that as well. in important distinction. when you have a dress that as well. in your- a dress that as well. in your statement. and you have addressed that. statement. and you have addressed that and statement. and you have addressed that. and there was a stock take meeting. that. and there was a stock take meeting, the meeting to which she referred meeting, the meeting to which she referred earlier, that is,, i think, 146558, referred earlier, that is,, i think, 146558, a referred earlier, that is,, i think, 146558, a letter from imran shafi, who reported on the meeting, a meeting who reported on the meeting, a meeting between yourself and the prime meeting between yourself