Live Breaking News & Updates on Biblical Assertions Of Eye For
Stay updated with breaking news from Biblical assertions of eye for. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
Chris Cuomo asks the tough questions to newsmakers in Washington and around the world. Rosenstein look, Jeff Sessions he recused himself. Had to have recused himself because theres a regulation in place that says if you work on a campaign and theres a criminal investigation relating to that campaign the president says it was a bum move and he should have told him about it and it was a total hoodwink. Wrong, wrong, wrong. As far as it being a hoodwink, sessions would have had to have had the gift of prophecy along with the president in order to believe at the time he was ainterest poed, there was was going to be to an investigation thats why i was confused by your initial writings on this one because of my respect for your mind and that rosenstein the only thing he could do is get a prophylactic in play, get somebody who had one layer away from the president , which technically a ....
The fact is that we dont need a direction from the president to the intelligence chiefs to be on guard against russian interference with our elections, number one. Number two, as far as what the president says on any given day, frankly he says a lot of things. He is, i think, campaigning against impeachment rather than saying anything that is designed to affect the outcome of the case. So i kind of brush that off. But to go back to your first point, that we dont need the president for the intelligence community. Thats a little counterintuitive. We expect the leadership from the president to be of paramount importance when were dealing with threats like this, which to the democracy is basically existential. So for him to not be on the same page seems to be highly counterproductive. Its counterproductive, but it is not at all necessarily critical. These intelligence agencies, particularly in an administration where statements
get made all the time, i think are pretty much doing their job ....
Logic of being pro life. if you believe you don t mess with life in one area, you don t mess with it period, and it plays with an inconsistency in america. many that call themselves pro life are also pro death penalty. that s always struck me as odd regardless of innocence of the actor and biblical assertions of eye for eye. either the big man calls the shots or we do. which is it? then i read a little bit more into words and thoughts, and i thought about it a little bit more, and i see something that s not just smart but stunning. in argentina, the pope then, he was only a huge opponent of the death penalty but of inequities of how we treat the living. his argument has always been if you re pro-life, then you re proall life equally. the question for you is are you pro life? and if you say yes, do you mean just when it comes to a fetus? ....
Regardless of any argument of innocence of the actor and biblical assertions of eye for eye. either the big man calls the shots or we do. which is it? then i read a little bit more into words and thoughts, and i thought about it a little bit more, and i see something that s not just smart but stunning. in argentina, the pope then, he was only a huge opponent of the death penalty but of inequities of how we treat the living. his argument has always been if you re pro-life, then you re pro all life equally. the question for you is are you pro life? and if you say yes, do you mean just when it comes to a fetus? how about when it comes to a felon or color? you may answer quickly and say yes, but do you see that in the choices of your politics, in our collective choices about our economy, our institutions, our justice system? do we see it on the border with ....