Thank you for having me. [applause] thank you so much. God bless you all, ladies. I love you. [applause] it starts with us. We have to be together, no matter what. Thank you so much. God bless you, take care. [applause] all right. Give it up for ledeci. Give it up for ledeci one last time. She can hear you back stage. [applause] there you go. The mayor told me that she would pack into a crowded cafe and listen to ledeci years ago, so here she is back on the mayors stage. So i got a promise from the mayor back stage that she wants to see you back he volunteers. My name is mark a proud grand date i didnt all over San Francisco residents are adopt rains to keep our sewer system healthy im adopted a grain draining i thought of a simple illusion to a big problem it will help out the neighborhood and be responsible for the places we live i want or apparent to the web site and [ ] homelessness in San Francisco is considered the number 1 issue by most people who live here, and it doesnt just a
Is to look at ways to even if the buildings, we dont go for higher performance of the building per se, what can we do to facilitate through programs, reducing the impeding factor, and the ultimate goal, might not be able to read all the numbers but in the report, being able to reduce those functional recovery times, not changing anything in the building but impeding factors, beyond that is the question of enforcing higher performance standards beyond the basic California Building code forgiven that San Francisco has a lot of Tall Buildings in close proximity that serve important functions both for office and for residential. So a quick kind of run through that, appreciate your attention, i think we will move on now to probably the first panel discussion. Thank you. [applause] ok. Our next panel is a discussion on strengthening building performance. I will be your, the facilitator for this paneling. With us, my first guest is john hooper, who is with the applied technology council, who
Pleased that yesterday a member of your caucus acknowledges however, the full sentence was anytime, anywhere in the sense of a welldefined process with a welldefined end time so i am pleased that we have established that. In fact, the iaea can request access to any suspicious location with 24 hours notice under the Additional Protocol which iran will implement. The deal does not change that baseline. The issue if an agreement is not reached then when the iaea requests access the 24day clock will start. This is a new tool a finite time, a new tool for resolving disputes within what we think is a short period of time and short is defined because of our confidence in environmental sampling that we will be able to have to implement to detect microscopic traces of materials even after attempts are made to remove the evidence of activities with Nuclear Material. In fact, irans history provides a good example. In february of 2003, the iaea requested access to a suspicious facility in tehran,
Behavior, by holding out the prospect of relief if the worlds concerns were addressed. Once the iaea verifies that iran has taken key steps to rollback its Nuclear Program and extend its breakout time to at least one year, sanctions relief would come into effect. There is no signing bonus. To be clear, there will be no immediate changes to you in, eu, or u. S. Sanctions. Only if iran fulfills the necessary nuclear conditions will be u. N. Suspend secondary sanctions on a limited basis. Of course we must guard against the possibility that i run iran does not uphold it set of the deal. If iran violates its commitments once we have suspended the sanctions, we will be able to snap that vote to the u. S. And human sections. Since prohibiting the human stamp act requires a prohibitive vote from the un Security Council, the United States has the ability to force every imposition the reimposition of those sections. We will maintain significant sections that follow outside the scope of the nucl
Of broadcasteakout time. Breakout time in arms control is the time it takes to get a weapon. We have been dealing only with the amount of time it takes to get enough fissile material to produce one weapon. You still have to produce the weapon and most people dont guesstimate that a country is going to be satisfied with only one weapon and enough fissile material for one. Theres a lot of time beyond that. Weve been operating with a huge safety cushion here, and well have one year of broadcasteakout time for one fissile weapon for at least ten years and then it begins to tail down, but not as a cliff. It begins to tail down as we go through the next five years and thn were arriving at a point where iran has, hopefully, achieved normal status in the npt. I say hopefully because if they havent, the agreement hasnt worked in the sense theyve violated it and we go back to snapback and have the sanctions back in place. Can you answer whether all of our intelligence agencies are agreed on that