overcoming opposition and passing voting rights in the senate. >> these bills help treat the symptoms of the disease, but they do not fully address the disease itself. while i continue to support these bills i will not support separate actions that worsen the underlying disease of division infecting our country. >> senators kyrsten sinema and joe manchin, another protector of the filibuster, seem to believe when it comes to protecting democracy the cure is worse than the problem. in their minds eliminating the filibuster, a maneuver done many times before to bypass the 60-vote threshold, that that is somehow worse than republican states like texas and georgia making it harder to vote and installing partisans to perhaps put the thumb on the scale in a close election. how big is the threat? consider this last year 19 states enacted 34 laws that restrict voting and alter the vote counting process. hundreds more were introduced. more are coming this year. and threats of violence and intimidation from big lie believing trump supporters have forced dedicated election workers to quit. with the maga faithful lining up to take their places, perhaps less interested in democracy than in partisan victory. a sham audit in arizona sparked copy cats around the country. and even though no fraud was found, the fake audit still worked by sowing doubt in legitimate election results. this break down of trust is so bad recent polling showed just 21% of republicans believe that joe biden's election victory was legitimate. 21%. we're still learning new it disturbing details how trump and his allies tried to steal the 2020 election including a plot by republicans in at least five states to send forged election documents to washington declaring that donald trump won. tomorrow donald trump and his big lie cronies including qanon supporters and the guy who sells foam pillows are heading to arizona for a rally that will be unhindered by fact or reality to promote republican candidates who are backing these election lies. now, this would be a fringe event except for the fact the headliner is the former president of the united states and the front running republican presidential candidate for 2024. as axios notes, trump who remains the most powerful figure in the republican party is making his false claims about the 2020 election the center piece of his gop platform. trump has made clear to all who seek his endorsement if they want his blessing, they need to make overturning the 2020 election as much of a priority as subverting future elections, end quote. according to a count by nbc news donald trump has endorsed 93 candidates in gop primaries and general elections. of those 93 republicans, quote, 59 have questioned the 2020 election results including by voting against the electoral college certification in congress in addition to questioning the 2020 election results ten candidates who received trump's endorsement attended his rally in washington on january 6, 2021. well, tonight donald trump warned arizona's republican governor doug ducey, that he will not get trump's endorsement if he runs for senate. not trumpy enough according to big lie standard. we learned this week that the justice department is now prosecuting 11 insurrectionists with something called seditious conspiracy. the charges all tied to following trump's big lie, attacking the capitol and attempting to stop the certification of joe biden's win. and donald trump seems to think he can keep undermining our democracy in plain sight and there won't be any consequences. consider all of the damage happening to our democracy as we speak. we can all see it. you're not imagining things. the threat is very, very real. and for 48 senate democrats, at least, losing our democracy seems to be worse than losing a senate rule. kyrsten sinema and joe manchin apparently do not see it that way, so what else can be done? leading off our discussion tonight reginald boulding, a democratic leader of the arizona house of representatives and also running for arizona secretary of state. representative boulding, thank you for joining us this evening and good evening to you. i want to read to our viewers something important you said after kyrsten sinema's speech on the floor of the senate. you said senator sinema defends the antiquated gym kroe era filibuster by arguing any right granted by passage of a new voting rights act under regular order could be rolled back in future years if republicans gain power. you go onto say i challenge her to step outside the d.c. bubble and take a closer look around her state and her country. those rights are systematically being rolled back here and in state legislatures around the country. your point here is she's missing the point. >> yes. first, thank you for having me, ali. absolutely. in these four days we have already seen legislation that would limit ballot box, make it more difficult for individuals to have mail-in voting. we've seen restrictions out the door. and one of the things we have said to senator sinema currently right now what you're defending against is already happening here in the state of arizona. >> so what do you think -- this begs the question. what can we done? because the court of public opinion is being brought to bear on kyrsten sinema and joe manchin right now, but basically what kyrsten sinema was saying yesterday is don't bother continuing to try, this is what i have decided to do. i support better voting rights. i do not support fiddling with the filibuster. >> you know, we can't -- we can't operate with this defeatist mentality. we have to make sure we're continually pressuring senator sinema. the reality is democracy is on the line. elections are at stake, and we are seeing it every single day that the seat of democracy is being pulled from our communities. and that's why i'm running for secretary of state because my primary opponent in this race sent an e-mail to say if i was secretary of state i would have made sure donald trump won. so this big lie is already happening, and it's going through legislation and we can't have lawmakers celebrating mlk day unjust a couple of days without actually passing the legislation of what he fought for and stood for. >> one of the complexities particularly in states that are legislating ways in which it makes it harder for people to vote is that a lot of people can't register what's happening. if they don't feel like their right to vote is going to be curtailed or their ability to vote is not going to be hindered, it seems distant and abstract to them. but taken in the aggregate, this is very serious problemch how do you get people for whom this is not going to be a problem to understand their democracy is not perfect until this is fixed? >> i think one of the things you have to look at here in arizona, 80% of arizonians choose to vote by mail. and just ts last legislative session we had a bill that would literally remove 200,000 individuals. these are people who signed up for something called the permanent early voting list. they would remove 200,000 of these individuals from the list if they chose not to vote into elections. and it's designed primarily to make it more difficult for people to participate. coincidently, the more people we have that sign-up for vote by mail, the more you see our state moving and turning blue. i would say to people who don't understand and realize this is directly attacking them, realize they're coming for your vote, they're coming for democracy. if they believe that voting rights and expanding those rights will make it more difficult for them to win elections. >> how much of senator sinema's position is influenced by the fact you have a disproportionate number of elected people in the state of arizona who are not just supporters of the big lie but proponents of it? they are -- they are disinformation specialists. this rally that's going on in your state is wild. the participants and the things they've got to say, there's almost no line now between in your state between republicans, election deniers, conspiracy theorists and qanon people. >> you know, i think senator sinema is banking that in a couple years we'll all forget that we had this fight. but the reality is we're not going anywhere. we understand that democracy is on the line, and i believe that she is anticipating that after you go through a senate cycle and potentially power changes that she'll somehow be off the hook. but we want -- we're asking senator sinema to fight with that same vigor she did with the infrastructure package, to fight for voting rights. because just a few years ago when she was in the same state legislature she stood on behalf of the communities who are now being disenfranchised. so we're asking her to remember her roots, remember why she ran for office and stand up and fight for these communities who so very much need her to fight for democracy. >> arizona state representative reginald bolding, it is good to see you, sir. thank you for your passion and thank you for joining us tonight. >> thank you for having me. >> joining us now is democratic congressman peter welch of vermont. he's running for the united states senate. congressman, good to see you again. i marvel at the fact you were a year on the intelligence committee, so you saw this coming a long time ago, right? you saw how little lies became bigger lies, became the big lie. could you guess this is where we were going to be, donald trump's ability to lie about stuff has become the major challenge to democracy we face in america today? >> you know, donald trump is pretty good at lying, and now he's the big lie. my first task on the intelligence committee is when he called the president of ukraine and asked him to essentially do campaign dirt on joe biden. so i'm astonished because it's not anything we've had in this country. presidents republican and democrat have always adhered to the sacred trust we have that the voters decide who our president is. and their votes are counted, and their votes are accurately counted. so i'm astonished what trump has done. >> what's also amazing -- i just want to show our viewers an article from "the washington post" entitled "how republicans became the party of trump's election lie after january 6th." and it talks about how 163 republicans who embraced donald trump's false claims are now running for statewide positions that would give them the authority over the administration of elections, 69 candidates for governor, 13 candidates for state attorney general, 18 candidates for secretary of state in places where the person is the state's top election official. so, again, when we were dealing with this on the intel committee when you were in those early days and donald trump's first administration, it felt like it was a more contained thing. there was a moment after the election of 2020, after january 6th and at any time between january 6th of 2021 and now for republicans to say this is not who we are, and they have not done that. >> they haven't. i mean many of -- after the violence of january 6th, and i was there when the shot was fired, when the mob was trying to break in the door. and i talked to capitol police officers, and there were five people who died as a result of that. what was even more astonishing to me was that when we certified the election of joe biden 147 of my republican colleagues in congress voted against certification. that's never happened before in our country. what we have had is a norm through thick and thin republicans and democrats that voters in this country are the ones who decide who their president is, not the congress, not elected politicians. that's been shattered by donald trump. and it's a profound threat to the maintenance of our democratic tradition, the norm that the voters decide, not politicians. that's what's at stake. >> if everybody were clear, though, on the degree to which democracy in this country as we know it is threatened, you know, i ask you the same question that i talk to representative bolding about a moment ago, then everybody would realize they need to be in this fight. but it does seem there are a lot of otherwise fair-minded people who just don't think this is a five alarm fire for the way we do things in america. >> no, that's true. what's so scary about this is that there was violence that was used on january 6th in an effort to overthrow the election. i thought that that would be repudiated because most of us really recoil from the use of violence as a means of political persuasion. but right after that at 3:00 in the morning 147 of my colleagues voted, in effect, to side with the folks who were challenging the election through violence. and then what we've seen in legislatures around the country who are now trying through the democratic process setting up the machinery to be able to overturn an election in the future. and we cannot deny that's happening. and that's why it's so essential that we pass the voting right protections. those protections are about making certain that folks in trump districts and in biden districts have their vote counted and that there'll not be any political overthrow of what the voters want. this is really an all hands on deck moment for us. and by the way, you know, we're talking in the senate about the filibuster. and there's a real strong desire that i've always had to have bipartisan support for any legislation we pass. what's existential is that your vote be counted accurately and that the voters decide who our leader is. and that's really what's at stake here. >> i think that's the point. that's existential. the other stuff is debatable, and it's -- it's things we've come to compprises on, but the existential part is that everybody's vote does get counted, we don't give up that right. congressman, good to see you. coming up, the trump effect on our politics has brought augliness to our towns and communities, but local public servants from election officials to school board members being shouted out, harassed, menaced, even in some cases physically threatened. some new hampshirer members were told they should be hanged. we'll talk to one of them next. d we'll talk members were told they should be hanged. we'll talk to one of them next. t [bacon sizzles] ♪ [electronic music plays] ♪ woo! dove 0% is different. members told they should be hanged we'll talk to one of them next and put 48 hour freshness and 1 quarter moisturizers in. dove 0% aluminum deodorant lasting protection that's kinder on skin. i brought in ensure max protein, with thirty grams of protein. those who tried me felt more energy in just two weeks! (sighs wearily) here i'll take that! (excited yell) woo-hoo! ensure max protein. with thirty grams of protein, one gram of sugar, and nutrients to support immune health. liz, you nerd, cough if you're in here! shh! i took mucinex dm for my phlegmy cough. what about rob's dry cough? works on that too, and lasts 12 hours. 12 hours?! who studies that long? mucinex dm relieves wet and dry coughs. at vanguard, you're more than just an investor, you're an owner with access to financial advice, tools and a personalized plan that helps you build a future for those you love. vanguard. become an owner. do you struggle with occasional nerve aches vanguard. in your hands or feet? try nervivenerve relief from the world's #1 selling nerve care company. nervive contains alpha lipoic acid to relieve occasional nerve aches, weakness and discomfort. try nervivenerve relief. what does a foster kid need from you? to be brave. to show up. for staying connected. the questions they weren't able to ask. show up for the first day of school, the last day at their current address. for the mornings when everything's wrong. for the manicure that makes everything right, for right now. show up, however you can, for the foster kids who need it most— at helpfosterchildren.com democracy does not work unless we as citizens make it work, and there are some pretty easy ways to do that. for starters help people register to vote, volunteer at polling places, attend your local school board meetings, and those are just first steps which lead to greater civic engagement including running for office. this is a deal in the democracy of the people. the people get involved in deate and change things hopefully for the better. but over the last cup of years many americans who take part in this critical work of grass roots democracy are being harassed or worse. our next guest erica cohen is the chair of the dary school board in new hampshire. here's one example of what she's dealt with. it's about covid mandates in schools. >> i just have to call it for what it is. you guys are cowards. you force the masks on these kids, and i just want to say if you do force a mandate, genocide jab, an experimental jab on these kids, you guys are nazis and i hope you hang. i hope you -- >> sir, please be -- please stop. >> no, you're war criminals. if you do that to the kids you're war criminals -- >> the disgusting behavior we've seen from national politicians has trickled down to our local government. we can't expect our democracy to work if that's what happens when you attend a school board meeting. erica cohen fears moments like this are going to discourage participation. what i fear the most is community participation will become the domain of those who seek conflict or hold an anti-mask, anti-vax viewpoint. going to a meeting in today's hosal climate is deeply uncomfortable and running for office is out of the question. in the next school board election in my town is in march. joining us by phone is erica cohen, chair of the dairy school board in new hampshire. erica, thank you for being with us. you make two distinct points and i want to address both of them. the first one is that this comes in the way of civic duty. this comes in the way of people like you, volunteers typically who get involved sort of the gateway levels of public participation, and that that will be discouraged. we'll have fewer good people who want to be involved in politics. >> yes. my biggest fear is we're breaking down what needs to be a healthy discussion. without a healthy discussion you can't respectfully exchange ideas. because of all the vitriol going on i don't respond to speakers unless i respond in a clipped way. and i find this sad because i want to have a discussion with people. but since people talk at each other more than they talk to each other, i fear my words will be used against me. and i fear we can't exchange ideas if we can't listen to each other. and i feel like people aren't listening. >> are you in a position to hear or listen to a parent who complains about masks or vaccines who doesn't accuse you of being a nazi or enacting genocide or say he wished you'd hang? is it the tone or tenor of the conversation or the substance? >> it's definitely the tenor and not the substance. i have had parents who e-mailed very frustrated and concerned, and we exchanged opinions and we agreed to disagree. i actually even had one parent who was very against masks who after probably a 20-minute conversation offered to walk me out of the school board meeting the next week if people made those comments and i was scared. so it's definitely the tenor and not the substance. i have a strong belief that we need to be able to disagree and understand that disagreeing doesn't mean not listening. but i feel that that's something not always heard these days because of the instability and the vitrial. >> the other thing you write about equally or more important is attending school board meetings or community board meetings or city council meetings is one of the basic things every citizen in this country can do. they don't but they can, and they can participate. and your feeling is that these are not as well-populated as you'd like them to be and well-attended as you'd like them to be. and when there's this kind of vitrial it turns people off who weren't going to run for office but at least they were going to be engaged. >> and that is my biggest fear that people will see all this vitriol and say there's no way i'm getting involved in that because i don't want to be yelled at or listen to other people yelling or that's not something i want to be around. and as it is participation in school board meetings, in voting in running for office is very low. in my town in the last decade probably the average turnout was under 10%. so it doesn't take that many people to swing a vote. so if people don't participate at any level because they're turned off by the vitriol you get even less participation and a result a lot of people didn't choose, and i think that's very sad for democracy and for the kids, frankly. the kids deserve better. >> you're right. and thanks for sticking it out and for bringing this to our attention because everybody can actually fix this in every town across america tomorrow. so let's do that. erika, thanks very much for being with us. joining s now is democratic congresswoman brenda lawrence of michigan, cochair of the democratic women's committee. representative, lawrence, good to see you. thanks for taking time to be with us tonight. i have to say on one hand i'm listening to erika and thinking i'm glad there are people like her around, but on the other side when she says fewer than 10% show up for these meetings, we now need more than ever for people to be politically engaged. and it has to start at things like school boards and city councils. >> i am so glad to be with you tonight because i started my political career as a school board member. and i can't tell you how critical the job that you do as a school board member. you are setting the budget, the criteria, the books and the curriculum for the next generation. and we find that those people who come out only when they can come and voice their anger and engage in name-calling, it's sad but you have to stay focused on the issue. and thank god we have school boards, we have city councils, we have those township boards that come, you know, weekly to discuss and take care of the people. and that's where i learn my respect for public servicech. >> you also learn you do have to get engaged with people who do not share your viewers whether constituents or people who attend these meetings or your fellow board members. and that is also something we're losing practice at. >> you know, listening to the people i can tell you during the last four years when donald trump was president, i had to listen to a variety of positions and people who supported and people who were frustrated with the democrats because they felt we weren't doing enough. i'm hearing that now, but i have to listen. because from listening to the people you actually are educated. because what am i? i'm a representative. i'm not brenda lawrence going to congress to fight for my beliefs. i chose to run as a representative of the people. and it is critical that even those that you sit there and you say, oh, my goodness, and sometimes i have personally asked someone can you bring down the volume, talk to me, don't yell at me. i'm not hard-of-hearing. i want to hear what you have to say. and sometimes you as a statesman or stateswoman have to create the tone and the dialogue. and two things i cannot tolerate and that is lies, untruths and the insulting language where you're calling someone other than what their mother or father named them. other than that we can talk about everything. i'm an open book, and let's have that dialogue. >> one of the points erika made that struck me we know the participation in municipal elections tends to be very low. when she said under 10%, possibly means you could win an election with under 5% of support. and that gives a lot of voice to extremism, something you in your state have been dealing with. this week we saw the charging of a number of members of the oath keepers, but you have a lot of history of that in your state where people decide you know what, this politics thing isn't for me, i'll deal with it in my own way. >> one of the things when we're approaching martin luther king, and one is that loud voice of silence, where good people sit on the side line and allow those who are promoting hate, promoting untruths to go unchallenged, or no one stands up to say, no, that is not true. and that is greatest fear because when you talk about school board elections, they are low turnout. but the reality, the power that they have and the responsibility for your child, it should be just as popular as a presidential election. but i can tell you that we in america, we are motivated -- if someone's doing a good job they don't even turn out. it's not i'm not voting for you, but they will come out to vote against something. you know, they can actually say i don't know what the issues are, but i don't want this person. and so it is important on every level to get your message out and talk to people. and we count on these local elections to energize the local base because everything is local politics. and if the turnout is low for the elections, then you are going to have a low turnout for congress and for president. >> and this whole idea that if you dissuade people those few people who do decide to run for office may be discouraged as well. we need to fix this, and like i said we can all fix this immediately. thank you for taking the time to be with us tonight, congresswoman brenda lawrence. coming up, when ronald reagan declared it was morning in america again, the unemployment rate was 7%. by that measure the unemployment rate in the biden presidency right now is like christmas morning in america in pandemic recovery and actually still in a pandemic. we'll talk about that next. l ina pandemic pandemic we'l feel the difference with downy. (burke) this is why you want farmers claim forgiveness... [echoing] claim forgiveness-nel talk a'p just because of this. (woman) wow, that's something. (burke) you get a whole lot of something with farmers policy perks. [echoing] get a quote today. ♪ we are farmers. bum-pa-dum, bum-bum-bum-bum ♪ you could wait... all night... for an email response from steve, who will sign back in at 9 am tomorrow morning. orrrr... you could find the answer right now in slack. and give steve a break. slack. where the future works. - i'm norm. - i'm szasz. [norm] and we live in columbia, missouri. we do consulting, but we also write. [szasz] we take care of ourselves constantly; it's important. we walk three to five times a week, a couple miles at a time. - we've both been taking prevagen for a little more than 11 years now. after about 30 days of taking it, we noticed clarity that we didn't notice before. - it's still helping me. i still notice a difference. prevagen. healthier brain. better life. ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ earn about covid-19, ♪ ♪ the more questions we have. the biggest question now, what's next? what will covid bring in six months, a year? if you're feeling anxious about the future, you're not alone. calhope offers free covid-19 emotional support. call 833-317-4673, or live chat at calhope.org today. it's time for an economic reality check. the news media hasn't done a great job of communicating where the country's really at. you see a lot of doom and gloom and not a lot of substance to back that up economically. the s&p 500 ended 2021 with a 27% gain. about half of americans are not invested in the stock market which means about half are, and that market performance helps your 401k and your iras. then your job, the unemployment level at a low. average hourly pay has risen as a result, 4.6% in the past year. and all of these signs are signs of a strong economy, but let's not go overboard here. not everything is wonderful economically speaking at the moment. families are bracing for their first month without a child tax credit payment. the monthly payments of about to $300 per child included in the democrats' american rescue plan did not go out today for the first time in six months. what's more the payments are ending as inflation takes a toll on working families wallets. i mention wages are up, but so are prices which increased 7% over a 12-month period making 2021 the worst year for inflation since 1982. there's undoubtedly room for improvement, but what we're seeing right now is not an economy in crisis. we're seeing the result of policies that put more people into a stronger position during a once in a generation pandemic than they would otherwise have been. joining us now is the former chairman of the council of economic advisers for former president obama. currently a professor of economics. let's talk about this economy. there are a lot of people who are cautioning democrats, you know, there's going to be a mid-term election, and what people really vote on is the economy. except the economy we're facing right now is in pretty good shape notwithstanding the fact it's coming out of a pandemic. >> yeah. i thought your opening there was quite realistic, that certainly in the polls there are people expressing that they're dissatisfied with the economy. but if you take a step back there are major upsides on the economy as well as some things that are bad. so inflation is the worst part, and we're going to have to hope and work to get the supply chain under control and get the virus under control to bring down inflation in 2022. at the same time, the job market is as strong as it's been in years. economic growth has thus far been fairly robust. and wages and incomes are up. as you look at 2021, it does at first look like prices were up more than wages were up, but that forgets there was also an average of $3,500 tax cut for the average person. so if you add the tax cut to the amount that wages went up, overall we're a little better in 2021. but i don't want to be too rosy. i mean there's a reason why people in the polls think the economy's bad. and a lot of that has to do with prices. and they're seeing gas prices and food prices going up. i think we can get control of that if we can get control of the virus and go back to spending our money on services, which is what we used to spend most of our money on, and take a little of the pressure off the physical goods, which is the thing that's really driving up the price. but that still remains to be seen. i mean, we've definitely got to stay vigilant. >> let me ask you about something you wrote in december in an op-ed in "the new york times." you said understanding inflation's unequal impact across income groups could have far reaching implications for policymaking. for all the talk about income inequality, we need a matching discussion about inflation inequality. tell me what that means in lay-terms? >> at first i thought i was like i agree with you 100%, but, no, you were reading what i wrote. it says the inflation rate that you face as an individual, as a family depends on what you buy. okay, and so some things the prices are way up. if you live in a place where you have a long commute, then you're going to care a lot about the price of gas. and depending what foods you buy, depending where you shop, depending what your income is, it looks like the inflation rate differs systematically by income, and actually lower income people face higher inflation rates during this pandemic than high income people did. and we've got to take that into account. it's exactly like we think about wage growth across the income distribution. we should also be measuring what's happening to price growth across the income distribution. >> i think this is remarkably interesting conversation that can benefit from some graphics, which i will bring the next time we talk about it. let's talk about how you fight inflation. we've generally got in our minds in the back of our brain, in our lizard brain that inflation -- inflation going too high too fast is a bad thing. there are methods to fight -- to slow down an economy and that includes raising interest rates, which the fed has said it'll do probably three times this year. some economists are predicting maybe four times. will it do the job? and is there a danger if you increase interest rates you could squash this growing economy? >> yes. of course there's a danger of that. there's a danger on the other side if you don't snuff it out before it catches hold that like a sunburn by the time you see it, it's too late and you're going to be in pain. the only thing that i would remind everybody is have some sympathy for the fed because it's a difficult situation they're in because this wasn't a normal recession. in a way it wasn't really a recession at all. it was a huge downturn. but in a normal recession the thing that drives activity down is people stop buying tvs. they stop buying cars. they stop buying houses. the cyclicly sensitive sectors is what goes down. and that didn't happen this time. housing went up, tv purchases went up, cars booming through the roof. and the thing that caused the downturn is people stopped going to the dentist, they stopped going to restaurants, a bunch of services that are normally recession-proof. so the normal fed play book that, hey, we raised the interest rate and that's the way we cool off the demand for the booming sectors, how much does the interest rate matter for whether you're going to go to the dentist or get your haircut? not that much. so everybody's hounding the fed to dial back their stimulus. and i understand why, but i think we should also be realistic that when this is happening in the middle of a pandemic and at least some major component of it is coming from a supply chain shock, the normal fed menu is not -- that's not really what -- >> it's not meant to deal with that. austin, good to see you as always. a great conversation. i hope to continue it with you. the former chairman of the council of economic advisers for former president obama. coming up, 2022 is a going to be a tough mid-term election year, but democratic leaders are about to hand republicans a cudgel to bash them with for the next ten months. and some democrats like our next guest are screaming stop, don't do it. i'll explain next. t do it. do it. i'll free yearly eye exams, designer frames and prescription lenses. take advantage now. wow! ♪ explain next. doug.♪ and it's easy to customize your insurance at libertymutual.com so you only pay for what you need. isn't that right limu? limu? limu? sorry, one sec. doug blows several different whistles. doug blows several different whistles. [a vulture squawks.] there he is. only pay for what you need. ♪liberty, liberty, liberty, liberty♪ with relapsing forms of ms... only pay for what you need. there's a lot to deal with. not just unpredictable relapses. all these other things too. it can all add up. kesimpta is a once-monthly at-home injection... that may help you put these rms challenges in their place. kesimpta was proven superior at reducing the rate of relapses, active lesions, and slowing disability progression vs aubagio. don't take kesimpta if you have hepatitis b, and tell your doctor if you have had it, as it could come back. kesimpta can cause serious side effects, including infections. while no cases of pml were reported in rms clinical trials, it could happen. tell your doctor if you had or plan to have vaccines, or if you are or plan to become pregnant. kesimpta may cause a decrease in some types of antibodies. the most common side effects are upper respiratory tract infection, headache, and injection reactions. ready for an at-home treatment with dramatic results? it's time to ask your doctor about kesimpta. do i need to pretreat my laundry? nope! with tide pods, you don't need to worry. the pre-treaters are built in. tide pods dissolve even when the water is freezing. nice! if it's got to be clean, it's got to be tide. so of all the problems with congress i want to tell you about one you may rarely if ever think about. why are lawmakers allowed to trade stocks in individual companies and write the laws to regulate those companies at the same time? case in point, as the pandemic started in early 2020 several senators came under scrutiny for selling millions of dollars in personal stocks before covid shutdowns tanked the markets. their stocks were dumped around the time senators were getting private briefings about the severity of the virus. in short they knew stuff we didn't. and they acted on that privileged information for their personal gain. anywhere else wouldn't you call that insider trading? now, most people shrug this type of thing off as the kind of soft corruption in washington that's unlikely to change in any meaningful way. but some people are starting to pay more attention to this including some politicians who think banning members of congress from trading stocks is an issue where good politics and good policy align. now, currently there's a weak law in place. it's called the stock trading on congressional knowledge or stok act. but a congressional report by a business insider in 2020 found 50 members of congress failed to properly report their financial trades mandated by the stok act and doesn't keep the member from doing something unethical. democratic senator john ossoff has introduced a bill. lawmakers, spouses and their dependents would have to put them in a blind trust. but does that even go far enough? joining us now is lucas, a democratic candidate for united states senate in missouri, a u.s. marine corp veteran as well. and also with us a senior ethics fellow, the former director of the u.s. office of government ethics in the obama administration. welcome to both of you, gentlemen. walter, this one comes up against resistance from democrats and republicans who say why shouldn't they be able to make money off this stuff? and no one is saying they shouldn't be able to make money, nor should they not be able to invest in money. we're just saying you can't invest in companies because you may have information the rest of us that's right. you know, congress except for the itself from the conflict of interest, so they have nothing pushing them to divest stocks or stock trading on the information that they had. i think you're seeing a growing movement on both sides of the political spectrum, everybody from matt gaetz on the right to alexandria ocasio-cortez and representative spam burger in the house introduced the first of this many bills that are pending right now. and jon ossoff introduced a bill that i really like. he ran on a platform of pushing for change in congressional stock trading. one thing i like about his bill is the level of transparency it gets because it requires the trustee of blind trous notify that the senate and house ethics committees when they sell off the stock, and then those committees post them online. that's incredibly important because what you put in a blind trust isn't blind at all until it's sold off, and currently members of congress get told by trustees when it's sold off, so they have information we don't have about whether they know what's in their trust or not. and ossoff's bill would close that knowledge gap by forcing those notices to be put online, which means we the public can be engaged in monitoring these members of congress, and it creates an incentive to sell them off and not let them sit there where they can pose conflicts of interest. >> you answered a question i was going to ask about what's the problem with the blind trust part of things. some of the stuff in senator ossoff's bill is called -- has oversight by the ethics committee. that is an instance where -- i don't know there are many things in our society today we could be nonpartisan about. i'm not even sure we can agree it's friday night. but we can probably agree that there's a way that these people, these members of congress do not have to sacrifice being able to invest their money and still live up to something we would like to see in terms of ethics. >> you know, when i go around the state and i meet voters of every stripe, you know, what i hear over and over again is just a complete lack of trust in our institutions and congress is always at the very top. this is another good example of that, right? they get busted for insider trading it seems like every ten years. and in 2012 they came up with the fancy s.t.o.c.k. act where they'll police themselves and fine themselves $1,200 every time they do something wrong. they don't even pay the fine now. for me , this blind trust, honestly, it's just another shiny object. we have seen how blind trusts work. joe manchin has his coal company in a blind trust. does he forget that's where his wealth comes from? or if you have defense stocks, did you suddenly forget? no, you don't. there's still a conflict of interest. we're not going to trust we need to build. >> walter, do these new investment vehicles like exchange traded funds and index funds where you're buying a basket of stocks, does that solve any of the problem? could we just say you can't invest in pfizer or boeing or something like that, but you can invest in a basket? >> yes, and the executive branch, for instance, diversified mutual funds and diversified exchange traded funds are exempt from the conflict of interest law. and so everybody w goes io the president'sinet has to move their money into those kinds of investments. there's no reason members of congress can't get out of stocks and into these kind of diversified investment funds. i am completely unsympathetic to their claim, oh, we should still be allowed to make money like anyone else. well, they can. they can stay out of congress and make all the money they want. but if they want to ask the american people to hand them a great deal of power over their lives, then they owe us something. >> lucas, in december, nancy pelosi said that. she said we are a free market economy, meaning members of congress, they should be able to participate in that. there's some democratic resistance, but the argument in favor of actually doing the right thing here seems to be stronger. >> yeah, when i heard her say that, i heard let them eat cake. for me, like, and for everyone in missouri on either side of the party, that is the injustice we're all facing. like, when you join congress, you're there to serve. when i joined the marine corps and we went to iraq and afghanistan, we didn't get rich on that. we didn't whine and complain. we were there to serve our communities, the ones that took care of the growing up and the ones we joined to serve. when you join congress, you should be there to serve. it is about service, not getting rich, and, frankly, if what it takes to rebuild trust and to make decisions for people is to not own any stocks at all and to have a punishment equivalent to that of you, me, or martha stewart, then that's a deal we should all make and stand by because we have to make that change or we are never actually why i wanted to have this discussion tonight because this is actually got an easy solution. lucas, good to see you. walter, good to see you again as well. thank you for joining us tonight. tonight's last word is next. tonight's last word is next. people everywhere living with type 2 diabetes are waking up to what's possible... with rybelsus®. the majority of people taking rybelsus® lowered their blood sugar and reached an a1c of less than 7. rybelsus® isn't for people with type 1 diabetes. don't take rybelsus® if you or your family ever had medullary thyroid cancer or have multiple endocrine neoplasia syndrome type 2, or if allergic to it. stop rybelsus® and get medical help right away if you get a lump or swelling in your neck, severe stomach pain, or an allergic reaction. serious side effects may include pancreatitis. tell your provider about vision problems or changes. taking rybelsus® with a sulfonylurea or insulin increases low blood sugar risk. side effects like nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea may lead to dehydration, which may worsen kidney problems. wake up to the possibility of lower a1c with rybelsus®. you may pay as little as $10 for up to a 3-month prescription. ask your healthcare provider about rybelsus® today. ♪ ♪making your way in the world today♪ ♪takes everything you've got♪ ♪ ♪taking a break from all your worries ♪ ♪sure would help a lot ♪ ♪wouldn't you like to get away? ♪ ♪ ♪ sometimes you want to go ♪ ♪where everybody knows your name ♪ ♪ ♪and they're always glad you came ♪ what happens when you block heartburn with one prilosec otc in the morning? ♪ heartburn doesn't stand a chance - day... or night. excess stomach acid can cause heartburn. prilosec otc works differently by preventing excess acid production. so don't fight heartburn, block it. prilosec otc. one pill in the morning blocks heartburn, all day and all night. every day in business brings something new. so get the flexibility of the new mobile service designed for your small business. introducing comcast business mobile. you get the most reliable network with nationwide 5g included. and you can get unlimited data for just $30 per line per month when you get four lines or mix and match data options. available now for comcast business internet customers with no line-activation fees or term contract required. see if you can save by switching today. comcast business. powering possibilities. that's tonight's last word: catch me tomorrow morning at 8:00 a.m. eastern on my show "velshi." i'm talk to two attorneys ringing the alarm bells about the midterm elections. plus i'll talk to my friends dean obeidallah and joe walsh about how or whether we should be engaging with the post-trump class of dangerous conspiracy theorists that walk the halls of congress. "the 11th hour" starts now. jo. good evening once again. i'm alicia menendez. a major winter storm is barreling through the upper midwest right now and is on track to hit the south and the east coast this holiday weekend. more than 60 million people are under winter weather alerts. it's expected to create major travel headaches along the east coast. we'll have much more on all of that later in the hour. also tonight,