rafael nadal responds. in some way, i feel sorry for him. but at the same time, he knows, he knew the conditions since a lot of months ago. the uk prime minister borisjohnson has offered a humble and sincere apology over his failure to disclose key messages relating to the refurbishment of his flat at number 10 downing street. dozens are killed in kazakhstan fighting. russia has sent troops at the request of the kazakh president. hello and welcome. the us presidentjoe biden has asked the people of his country to defend democracy from a future of political violence and election cheating, as he marked the anniversary of the january the 6th storming of capitol hill by donald trump's supporters. president biden called on americans to ensure their nation wouldn't be one that "lives in the shadow of lies" and "accepts political violence as a norm". mr biden said donald trump created a web of lies around the lost election, and carries singular responsibility for the attack. let's head straight to laura trevelyan, who's on capitol hill. it was a very sombre speech from president biden. it it was a very sombre speech from president biden.— it was a very sombre speech from president biden. it was. he made the seech in president biden. it was. he made the speech in statuary _ president biden. it was. he made the speech in statuary hall, _ president biden. it was. he made the speech in statuary hall, which - president biden. it was. he made the speech in statuary hall, which is - speech in statuary hall, which is where almost exactly a year ago, the mob rampaged through that building it, trying to get to the capitol chamber where they were trying to stop the certification ofjoe biden�*s election victory. joe biden doesn't like to talk about donald trump directly, he doesn't like to mention his name, and he didn't, but spoke about the former president firm in very clear terms and held them directly responsible for what happened a year ago. we must be absolutely clear about what is _ we must be absolutely clear about what is true and what is a lie. and here's_ what is true and what is a lie. and here's the — what is true and what is a lie. and here's the truth — the _ here's the truth — the former president frank of the united _ the former president frank of the united states of america has created and spread _ united states of america has created and spread a web of lies about the 2020 _ and spread a web of lies about the 2020 election. he's done so because he values _ 2020 election. he's done so because he values power over principal, because — he values power over principal, because he sees his own interest is more _ because he sees his own interest is more important than his country's interest, — more important than his country's interest, then america's interest. and because he is a bruised ego matters — and because he is a bruised ego matters more to him that our democracy or our constitution. you can't _ democracy or our constitution. you can't accept — democracy or our constitution. you can't accept that he lost, even though— can't accept that he lost, even though that's what 93 united states senators. _ though that's what 93 united states senators, his own attorney general, his own _ senators, his own attorney general, his own vice — senators, his own attorney general, his own vice president, governors and state — his own vice president, governors and state officials in every battleground state have all said. he lost t0~ _ battleground state have all said. he lost to. that's what 81 million of you did — lost to. that's what 81 million of you did as— lost to. that's what 81 million of you did as you voted for a new way forward _ you did as you voted for a new way forward. he's done what no president in american _ forward. he's done what no president in american history, the history of this country. — in american history, the history of this country, as ever, ever done. he refused _ this country, as ever, ever done. he refused to— this country, as ever, ever done. he refused to accept the results of an election— refused to accept the results of an election and the will of the american people. just before president biden spoke, we heard from the us vice presidents, kamala harris, he was on capitol hill that day, and she had this to say about what the rioters were targeting. what the extremist who roamed these halls targeted was not only the lives _ halls targeted was not only the lives of — halls targeted was not only the lives of elected leaders, what they sought _ lives of elected leaders, what they sought to — lives of elected leaders, what they sought to degrade and destroy was not only— sought to degrade and destroy was not only a — sought to degrade and destroy was not only a building, hallowed as it is, what _ not only a building, hallowed as it is, what they were assaulting where the institutions, the values, the ideals _ the institutions, the values, the ideals that generations of americans have marched, picketed atjeddah biood _ have marched, picketed atjeddah blood to— have marched, picketed atjeddah blood to establish and defend. us vice president kamala harris speaking are few moments ago. what happened onjanuary the 6th a year ago is deeply disputed by americans. we have 58% of republican voters believing that actually, the election of president bayern munchen is in some way illegitimate. so there are these competing narratives about that day but i was there that day, i remembervery about that day but i was there that day, i remember very clearly the mob coming towards the capitol chanting at stop the steal. our correspondence was also here that day and she takes a look back at what happened. the day that the country's political turmoil exploded into violence. it was the worst attack on the capitol in two centuries, playing out for hours on live television. americans watched in horror as armed supporters of the president beat police officers. and stormed through the country's citadel of democracy, threatening lawmakers. this was the climax of donald trump's desperate campaign to overturn his election loss. we fight like hell, and if you don't fight like hell, you're not going to have a country any more. the rioters believed they were following his orders. a year ago, i was here, walking with trump supporters to the capitol, finding out with them in real time what was going on. it felt momentous, it felt like history breaking cover. it felt like a turning point. but was it? what impact has it actually had? hearye, hearye, hearye. there was the theatre of an impeachment trial. it is civil process. and hundreds of criminal prosecutions by the department ofjustice. also, an ongoing political investigation by a congressional commission. but after a fleeting moment of criticism, most republican politicians closed ranks behind trump. his allies continue to propagate the lie that the election was stolen. the vast majority of republican voters now believe it. and americans looking back at that day see different realities along bitterly partisan lines. the congressional commission is determined to write the definitive draft of this turbulent history but so far, trump has not been held accountable and he appears to be preparing a 2024 comeback. usually, after a year, you would be like, all right, what's changed? nothing. nothing has really changed. nothing? no, as far as accountability, as far as justice, as far as a deterrent from this happening again. nothing has changed. one year later, many americans believe the capitol attack was not an isolated incident. they fear that further political violence lies ahead. this is a nation still at war with itself. for more on president biden's speech andindeed for more on president biden's speech and indeed the state of the republican party today we're joined by ron christie, here in washington. ron worked with george w bush. you heard there president biden accusing former president trump of spreading a web of lies about the 2020 election. do you think it was an effective speech?— election. do you think it was an effective speech? good morning. i think there — effective speech? good morning. i think there are _ effective speech? good morning. i think there are two _ effective speech? good morning. i think there are two things - effective speech? good morning. i think there are two things to - effective speech? good morning. i think there are two things to keep | think there are two things to keep in mind here. ithink think there are two things to keep in mind here. i think the former president is in a position where they should have their assignments about the successor in office. i think the reverse of that is also true. i think president biden did a disservice now we are talking about unity of talking about spreading a web of lies about as predecessor in office. so, in a day of unity, and a day when we commemorate what happens onjanuary day when we commemorate what happens on january the 6th a day when we commemorate what happens onjanuary the 6th a year ago, i don't think that is the right tone. but there is no unity, republicans are not taking part in the official commemoration is happening here, the nation is divided. how can you explain to the world how it is that president trump's grip on the republican party, despite what happened years ago, seems to be as strong as ever? this happened years ago, seems to be as strong as ever?— happened years ago, seems to be as strong as ever? this is something we haven't seen — strong as ever? this is something we haven't seen in _ strong as ever? this is something we haven't seen in american _ strong as ever? this is something we haven't seen in american politics, - haven't seen in american politics, certainly not in the last 100 years, i think about roosevelt's control over the party. donald trump has mesmerised so many republicans but also put a bit of fear in so many others, fear of, if you don't support the president, his agenda, donald trump, that is, he will run a primary opponent to get you taken out of office. so for a republican party today is in disarray i do think it's part of it he's afraid what the 44th president of the united states might do to endanger their prospects of remaining in office, which is really a shame. it should be about the country, not about your own political ambitions and future. in about your own political ambitions and future. ~ . about your own political ambitions and future. . ., ,, and future. in the wall street journal today. _ and future. in the wall street journal today, the _ and future. in the wall street journaltoday, the republican journal today, the republican political strategist, rose, who know well, when the architects of george w bush's victory, he says republicans must confront it when either party which calls capital rioters political prisoners and patriots. but will that happen, do you think? patriots. but will that happen, do ou think? ., ., ., ., , you think? no. i read that, it was an excellent _ you think? no. i read that, it was an excellent piece. _ you think? no. i read that, it was an excellent piece. karl - you think? no. i read that, it was. an excellent piece. karl articulates something that most republican are fearful of articulating, it is about principles and policy, it is not about filter towards one man or one individual, donald trump. the longer the republicans refused to stand up for their sensei we're about party and country rather than about one individual, we are going to continue to be in a state of disarray. but sadly, in the short—term, i see any change, it seems to be donald trump all the time. fin change, it seems to be donald trump all the time-— all the time. on this question of former president _ all the time. on this question of former president trump's - former president trump's accountability, his responsibility for what happened that day, the department ofjustice are charged more than 700 of the rioters with various crimes. here on capitol hill, the january the 6th committee is investigating what happened and delete republican in it, liz cheney, has hinted maybe that could be a criminal referral to the department ofjustice for former president trump because of his role in obstructing the official certification of the election. do you see that as a possibility? i you see that as a possibility? i don't but there's several things to unpack. i think leader mccarthy and senator pelosi did greater service to the country by not putting aside partisan differences to have a truly bipartisan commission. you have liz cheney and another republican from illinois but neither of them are ranking republicans, they don't have jurisdiction. has won a former president of the united states, he was impeached on this issue and acquitted in the senate, but criminal referrals, criminal ruled out a, i don't see that. you have to have an evil intent in the criminal statutes, and i don't see how it beyond a reasonable doubt you could find a binding criminal case against the 44th president of the united states. the 410th president of the united states. ., ., ., :: , ., states. ron, we have now 4096 of republicans _ states. ron, we have now 4096 of republicans and _ states. ron, we have now 4096 of republicans and polls _ states. ron, we have now 4096 of republicans and polls saying - republicans and polls saying political violence can sometimes be justified. in one and 20% of democrats agreeing with that. is it possible that what happens here a year ago, something that we're seeing in kazakhstan, political protesters storming buildings, is it possible that it becomes normalised? let me put it to you this way, i stand one year later and i worry about our democracy from this sense. republicans believe by and large that the election was stolen from donald trump. democrats peep believe people of colour are being disenfranchised and aren't being able to cast their votes properly. we are to precipice in our democracy when all the political spectrum must come together and say we don't trust the way we conduct elections. you saw what happened in kazakhstan the other day, it's troubling, i remain confident that we remained the beacon of freedom and democracy in the world but we need to take a close examination in the mirror and say how can we do better, we must do better than theirs, we must do better than theirs, we must do better than theirs, we must do better than what we saw a year ago today. this better than what we saw a year ago toda . �* , , ., better than what we saw a year ago toda . r ~' ., better than what we saw a year ago toda . a ,, ., , .,, better than what we saw a year ago toda . a ,, ., , ., today. as you know, democrats are focusin: today. as you know, democrats are focusing on — today. as you know, democrats are focusing on what's _ today. as you know, democrats are focusing on what's happening - today. as you know, democrats are focusing on what's happening in - focusing on what's happening in those swing states by republicans loyal to donald trump and trying to change the composition of the election boards. do you think it's possible, the future disputed election that, any swing states, and election that, any swing states, and election board could say, this result in arizona is wrong, even though x won and we, the election boards, the representatives of the people and we overturned this result. i people and we overturned this result. ., �* , . . , result. i think it's certainly possible- _ result. i think it's certainly possible. is _ result. i think it's certainly possible. is the _ result. i think it's certainly possible. is the legal- possible. is the legal representative for the campaign in northern florence are back in 2000, i saw first hand up close what happens when you have an election board officials holding up ballots and trying to ascertain the spirit of what a voter try to do. to fight for george w bush or al gore or someone else? we've seen it before and i hoped we would never see it again it but it is certainly possible because i have seen it up close and personal myself. but what do ou close and personal myself. but what do you think — close and personal myself. but what do you think the _ close and personal myself. but what do you think the answer _ close and personal myself. but what do you think the answer is? - close and personal myself. but what do you think the answer is? as - close and personal myself. but what do you think the answer is? as well| do you think the answer is? as well as being a political structure says that you are an educator, you think very deeply about the american civil discourse. how do we forward from here when we can't even agree on the narrative of what happens onjanuary the 6th? i narrative of what happens on january the 6th? , . ., , narrative of what happens on january the 6th? , _, , .,. ., the 6th? i 'ust completed teaching a course the 6th? ijust completed teaching a course called — the 6th? ijust completed teaching a course called the _ the 6th? ijust completed teaching a course called the american - course called the american presidency and my students as the very question you did and i said, quite frankly, it's about putting the country above yourself, it's about trying to do better for the collective good than trying to do good for your political career or to enrich yourself financially. we have to step back, we have to find a way to step back, we have to find a way to say that we can look at each other as individuals, we can politely agree to disagree, but the idea that i have to win and you have to lose in orderfor us idea that i have to win and you have to lose in order for us to idea that i have to win and you have to lose in orderfor us to move forward is a recipe for disaster. and as i said to my students, it's about the american democracy, not about the american democracy, not about your collective, selfish goals. about your collective, selfish coals. ., , about your collective, selfish oals. ., , ., ~' ,., about your collective, selfish coals. ., , ., ,, goals. ron christie, thank you so much forjoining _ goals. ron christie, thank you so much forjoining us. _ goals. ron christie, thank you so much forjoining us. happy - goals. ron christie, thank you so much forjoining us. happy new. goals. ron christie, thank you so - much forjoining us. happy new year. much for “oining us. happy new year. ron much forjoining us. happy new year. ron christie, — much forjoining us. happy new year. ron christie, someone _ much forjoining us. happy new year. ron christie, someone who _ much forjoining us. happy new year. ron christie, someone who thinks - ron christie, someone who thinks very deeply about the state of american democracy, someone who was in the white house of former president george w bush, a very different figurative former president donald trump, and so here we are on this day, a solemn day where this hour, the house speaker nancy pelosi is beginning a day of remembrance, of reflection on what happens onjanuary remembrance, of reflection on what happens on january the remembrance, of reflection on what happens onjanuary the 6th. but republicans are not taking part in these commemorations, it is democrats are talking about effective democracy, democrats who are convening historians to talk of the day and former president donald trump he was going to give a live press conference from mar—a—lago, in florida, has rethought that but remains a strong atop the republican party, just as it was a year ago today. party, 'ust as it was a year ago toda . �* party, 'ust as it was a year ago toda . . ., . ., ., , ., ., today. and how much of that is to do with his influence _ today. and how much of that is to do with his influence through _ today. and how much of that is to do with his influence through the - today. and how much of that is to do with his influence through the media| with his influence through the media and his immense personal wealth? because that popularity, of course, can translate again into a political future once more.— can translate again into a political future once more. absolutely. right now, future once more. absolutely. right now. former — future once more. absolutely. right now, former president _ future once more. absolutely. right now, former president donald - future once more. absolutely. right| now, former president donald trump is saying he will make a decision after the midterm elections in november as to whether or not he's running but the question as to why he still has this whole sorry the party is fascinating, especially when you think he's been a deplatformed by twitter, he doesn't have the megaphone of social media any more and yet he has very effectively, the ten republicans who dared to impeach him in the house, he has it through the loyalty he has at the grass roots of the republican party, threaten to primary so many of those people. liz cheney, who was the most powerful republican lawmaker spoke out against him, saying republicans must choose the constitution over donald trump, he is supporting a primary bid against her. it's not thought that likely she can survive. so, he has this strength because of his ability to articulate the grievances that many republicans feel about the direction of the country and even though he doesn't have a social media platform, he retains a great power. laura, we'll let you go, get a glass of water! men's tennis world number one novak djokovic is in a dramatic stand—off with authorities in australia after having his visa revoked on arrival in melbourne for the first grand slam tournament of the year. djokovic, who has said publically that he is opposed to vaccination, gained a medical exemption by tennis australia from having to be double—jabbed against covid. but it was rejected by federal authorities on his arrival there and he now faces deportation. djokovic is currently in a government detention hotel. he's launched an appeal and will have to wait till monday for the hearing. shaimaa khalil has the story. the world number one arriving in melbourne, ready to defend his australian open title, only to be told he is no longer welcome. after hours of being held at the city's airport, novak djokovic was taken to a quarantine hotel. he came to australia with a vaccine exemption but the border authorities said his visa had to be revoked because of a mistake. the issue of mr djokovic, rules are rules and there are no special cases. rules are rules, that's what i said to you yesterday, that's the policy of the government and has been our government's stong border protection policies and particularly in relation to the pandemic. his legal team have challenged the decision and a court hearing will resume on monday. outside the hotel, tension was high among his supporters. even as they danced and the music played, you could feel their frustration. i was pretty angry and disappointed and ashamed of being an australian. i'm an australian born and for this to happen in my country, to discriminate like this and treat people like this that have come from overseas that have a medical exemption and haven't done anything, that's bad, really, just, he's here to play. i don't think it is ok for him to have been dragged all this way for this spectacle to take place. novak djokovic has landed in the middle of a controversy that has gone beyond tennis and is now at the heart of a political tussle between state and federal authorities. and while mr djokovic and his legal team wait for a decision on monday, confusion and anger are the overriding sentiments here. novak djokovic was expected to go head—to—head with rafael nadal. a 21st grand slam title is at stake and today, his rival didn't mince his words. he is free to take his own decisions but then there are some consequences and of course, i do not like the situation that is happening. others were still trying to process the events as they developed. i think, yeah, he probably went to the airport, something was either wrong with the paperwork, i don't know. if he had a fair exemption from the rule, well, he should be here. if he didn't, he shouldn't be here. for years, novak djokovic has dominated the australian open, winning nine times. but his attempt at a tenth title may be over before the tournament even began. i'm joined now by the american tennis player tennys sandgren, who is a two—time australian open quarterfinalist. thank you forjoining us. do you think djokovic should be allowed to play in this tournament or does it look like he has broken the rules? it's tough to say. for all intents and purposes, he was cleared by the two medical boards for the exemption that had the anonymity of names, so there was no special favour in that. in the air, that seem to change and sentiments seem to change and it became a political tussle. i5 sentiments seem to change and it became a political tussle. is at sentiments seem to change and it became a political tussle.- became a political tussle. is at a olitical became a political tussle. is at a political tussle _ became a political tussle. is at a political tussle or _ became a political tussle. is at a political tussle orjust _ became a political tussle. is at a political tussle orjust following l political tussle or just following the rule set up by the state and federal governments in australia, that apply to everybody? it’s federal governments in australia, that apply to everybody? it's tough to sa but that apply to everybody? it's tough to say but there _ that apply to everybody? it's tough to say but there are _ that apply to everybody? it's tough to say but there are other - that apply to everybody? it's tough to say but there are other players i to say but there are other players got medical exemptions that weren't met with such scrutiny or border police and getting comments from the prime minister while they were in the air. it's tough to say what happened because we don't have all the information but it seems he was under more scrutiny than other players. under more scrutiny than other -la ers. , ., , , under more scrutiny than other laers, , f players. presumably, everyone's under scrutiny _ players. presumably, everyone's under scrutiny and _ players. presumably, everyone's under scrutiny and the _ players. presumably, everyone's under scrutiny and the deputy i players. presumably, everyone's- under scrutiny and the deputy prime minister said if he hasn't told the truth, he should be deported from australia. i appreciate you don't know exactly details he's presented. you also, i gather, haven't been vaccinated, is that right? correct. does that mean _ vaccinated, is that right? correct. does that mean you _ vaccinated, is that right? correct. does that mean you can't - vaccinated, is that right? correct. does that mean you can't take - vaccinated, is that right? correct. l does that mean you can't take part in international tournaments? this of in international tournaments? as of ri . ht in international tournaments? as of riaht now, in international tournaments? as of right now. i — in international tournaments? as of right now. i can't — in international tournaments? as of right now, i can't take _ in international tournaments? as of right now, i can't take part - in international tournaments? as of right now, i can't take part in - in international tournaments? r: rrf right now, i can't take part in the australian open. i don't meet any of the criteria to apply for a medical exemption, mine was a personal choice, i don't think you should be mandated to take the vaccine if you don't want to. if you feel it is in your best interest, then you should absolutely, and is i don't believe that, so i made that choice for myself but it's tough, because i would love to go and play, i have great memories.— would love to go and play, i have great memories. shouldn't the same basically apply _ great memories. shouldn't the same basically apply to _ great memories. shouldn't the same basically apply to djokovic, - great memories. shouldn't the same basically apply to djokovic, if - great memories. shouldn't the same basically apply to djokovic, if you - basically apply to djokovic, if you choose not have the vaccine, then he has to follow the rules of the country he's trying to enter? absolutely, but to make this avenue available of medical exemption and said there was this two panels of doctors reviewing cases and names weren't attached to those cases, so from the best of our knowledge, he cleared those two panels but then what changed when he was on the flight? how did it go so awry is what i think everybody�*s wondering? it is to do with state and federal rules which have perhaps not been complied with and we don't know if there is been an honest revelation of data also. there is a bigger question because this isn'tjust about one person, a huge role model, about one person, a huge role model, a huge global sports star, he is a role model to children and adults everywhere. in terms of following the rules or taking a vaccine, protecting others, notjust himself, doesn't he have a responsibility to be ultra—careful in what he does he be ultra—careful in what he does ia: has a be ultra—careful in what he does “i9: has a responsibility, he be ultra—careful in what he does “i9 has a responsibility, he definitely has a responsibility, he definitely has a responsibility, he definitely has a huge spotlight on him and i think he is a great role model, i think he is a great role model, i think this pandemic is showing us a lot of things and one of those is that general health is a big deal and a big issue and nobody takes better care of themselves, i think, then novak djokovic does, he has a ticket was with his diet and training and that goes a long way in general health terms in dealing with their spangles i think regardless of its vaccination status, he is a fantastic role model. just briefly, our back fantastic role model. just briefly, your back on _ fantastic role model. just briefly, your back on a — fantastic role model. just briefly, your back on a hesitancy - fantastic role model. just briefly, your back on a hesitancy is - fantastic role model. just briefly, your back on a hesitancy is about| your back on a hesitancy is about what, why do you not want to take it? i what, why do you not want to take it? :, �* 4' what, why do you not want to take it? :, �* ~ , :, , it? i don't think we should be forced to- — it? i don't think we should be forced to. i _ it? i don't think we should be forced to. i don't _ it? i don't think we should be forced to. i don't think- it? i don't think we should be forced to. i don't think the i it? i don't think we should be i forced to. i don't think the state should be forcing us to be vaccinated. in this particular case. tennys sandgren, we believe that they are, thank you forjoining us today on that question that's causing a lot of debates. there is more online and we are back in few minutes. i'm on twitter, tojoin us when you can't. weather coming up. wintry scenes today with the snow over the hills and the cold stays where those today and into tomorrow. this is that they driving area of low pressure, tightly packed isobars going with these weather systems have been strong winds as well. a lot of it is rain at lower levels but does the snow it over the hills that we're seeing and without lots of showers following and for the rest of the day. ahead of this system pretty blustery wind blowing, it is accentuating the chill. it was a really cold start as well for many external temperatures haven't risen that much and are more likely to be around two celsius, particularly in the north, but further west with the added sunshine, a little higher. grew tonight, the front close to the east and behind it, the cold air returns and more snow showers to come. it with temperatures falling close to freezing, not as cold as last night but low enough for ice to form. later in the night, we're watching exhibited to the west because we could have another little band of rain and hill snow so rather hazardous conditions on the roads in the next 24 hours. there are warnings on our website. let's watch tomorrow, the tightly packed isobars still with us but particularly in the south without weather system, again with the cold air. so scattered snow showers in the north, potentially at lower levels and blowing on that wind, and that rain is likely to turn to snow across the hills of south wales in southern england, blown in by strong winds well. that will accentuate the chill. forthe well. that will accentuate the chill. for the north, sunny spells but a scattering of heavy showers, thunder in among those as well. turning their attention towards the weekend, the next atlantic low pressure coming in, westerly winds dominating, those winds meaning a change to milder conditions, wet, windy conditions sweeping eastwards with plenty of showers following behind as well. sunday looks quieter but at the moment, really quite wet for some on saturday, at least for three or four hours before that system clears out. a ridge of high pressure on sunday bring a quieter speu pressure on sunday bring a quieter spell of weather but again, wetter and windier to start next week. this is bbc news. the headlines... 0n the anniversary of the attack on the us capitol — president biden has condemned has predecessor donald trump for threatening democracy. the former president of the united states of america has created and spread a web of lies about the 2020 election. he has done so because he values power over principle. i am election. he has done so because he values power over principle.- values power over principle. i am in washington — values power over principle. i am in washington on _ values power over principle. i am in washington on the _ values power over principle. i am in washington on the anniversary i values power over principle. i am in washington on the anniversary of. values power over principle. i am in | washington on the anniversary of the capital— washington on the anniversary of the capital riot _ washington on the anniversary of the capital riot work president biden has accused his predecessor of spreading a web of lies about that 2020 _ spreading a web of lies about that 2020 election. a court hearing on whether novak djokovic is medically exempt from covid entry requirements is adjourned until monday. prime minister borisjohnson has offered a �*humble and sincere apology�* over his failure to disclose key messages — relating to the refurbishment of his downing street flat.