Tarun Tejpal rape case: Goa court frames charges, next date of hearing on Nov 21
Tarun Tejpal rape case: Goa court frames charges, next date of hearing on Nov 21
A Goa Court On Thursday Finalised The Next Date Of Hearing In A Rape Case Against Tarun Tejpal, Former Editor-in-chief Of Tehelka Magazine, On November 21.
News Nation Bureau | Edited By : Ashish Ranjan | Updated on: 28 Sep 2017, 04:53:24 PM
New Delhi:
A Goa court on Thursday finalised the next date of hearing in a rape case against Tarun Tejpal, former editor-in-chief of Tehelka magazine, on November 21.
Public Prosecutor Francisco Taviera informed that charges were framed and has been explained to Tarun Tejpal. He added that Tejpal has pleaded not guilty to rape charge.
Bombay HC tells CR to pay Rs 8 lakh to dad of man who fell from train and died | Mumbai News
indiatimes.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from indiatimes.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
Mumbai Angry Over The Crowd In The Court The Judge Warned For Not Hearing The Petition - मुंबई: हाईकोर्ट में भीड़भाड़ देख खफा हुए जज साहब, बोले- किसी की भी याचिका नहीं सुनेंगे
amarujala.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from amarujala.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
Bombay HC
MUMBAI: The Bombay HC removed a matter from board after seeing that a counsel for the appellant had taken off his mask.
Justice Prithviraj Chavan was on February 22 hearing a first appeal with a civil application pending since 2018 when he observed, “Counsel for the appellant has removed the mask despite guidelines.’’ He then passed an order for removal, pointing out that SOP for resumption of physical hearing contemplates “wearing of mask at all times, even during arguments’’ as mandatory.
Entry for one advocate per party: SOP
The SOP also requires strict compliance of social distancing and says entry to court rooms for physical hearing stands restricted to: “one advocate per party whose vakalatnama is on record or who has been duly authorised and whose case is listed for hearing on board of concerned court.’’ It also makes entry into court rooms permissible to advocates and party-in-person whose matter is called for hearing.