That has been issued over the course of what is required for the minimum staffing requirement . And has that been looked at by your office . Supervisor farrell ms. Campbell first. Ill respond to the supplemental appropriation. We based our numbers on the reasonably expected increases over the end of the year. Based on minimum staffing requirements . Looking at supplemental we were looking at the average spending per pay period per overtime, accounting for the fact that there were holidays coming up between that day and the end of the year. Supervisor breed i want to be clear. You dont take into account minimum staffing requirement so that over time does not exceed the minimum staffing requirement . Yes we did. We looked at the number of ftes the expositions they have to staff the fire stations as of that date and how it compared as of that data prior years, and how it compares to overtime spending as of that date and how it extends out to the end of the year. Supervisor breed how do we
Requirements . Looking at supplemental we were looking at the average spending per pay period per overtime, accounting for the fact that there were holidays coming up between that day and the end of the year. Supervisor breed i want to be clear. You dont take into account minimum staffing requirement so that over time does not exceed the minimum staffing requirement . Yes we did. We looked at the number of ftes the expositions they have to staff the fire stations as of that date and how it compared as of that data prior years, and how it compares to overtime spending as of that date and how it extends out to the end of the year. Supervisor breed how do we account for the discrepancy . They were spending at that pace through the pay period ending on may 24, the last pay period for which the data is not in yet, they were projecting significantly higher overtime. We had not seen in the original translations. They were spending 1. 5 million in a pay period, higher than in any other pay per
People off . I dont think that will be the intention of this body and certainly not my intention. Supervisor breed . I just, i am not necessarily clear on the analysis presented and i think that the positions in your office are approved and if there is a problem in the fiscal year and there is an overage and you have to come back before us we will be obligated to support that. And so, i am just not certain, i am not clear on the explanation in terms of the back sale and what that all means, it is not making sense to me. Sure. So what it is is we are fully funded, with the current budget assuming that we do not have this 270,000 reduction. If we were to take the 270,000 reduction, we will start a year on the deficit spending. And whether that will be directed during the year, as the people leave when we do not hire people and there are vacancies that remains to be seen. Okay. Supervisor weiner . I dont think that they will be obligated to do a supplemental and if we think that they are
Care. Do he they want to be a dph client, do they want to go somewhere else. There is a lot of uncertainty around that. The governor has made proposals about potentially shifting those responsibilities entirely to the counties which would have significant and significant costs and operational issues if that were to happen. Finally, this projection does not make any assumptions about any current Year Supplemental appropriations. So, based on the actions of the board thus far, we have the Domestic Violence supplemental which is about 1. 9 million in annualized costs and the supplemental that we discussed today, the state supplemental. Together those would add approximately 7. 7 million to the shortfall. People always want to know where have we been and how do the targets or the instructions that the mayor have given compare in prior years. This table lays that out. Youll recall that 200910 was a really banner year for us in terms of shortfalls. We projected a 5 76 million deficit. I thin
So, we are at the same time negotiating a final change order for the discovery of those features with the contractors. All that to say that we will need to go back to our commission and to this committee in about april or may. We will come back and seek from you an approval for additional revisions to the program costs. Now, any increases in the program on that project in the program, we will want to compensate by with savings. So, at the same time we are undertaking a very comprehensive assessment of all remaining projects with the goal of identifying savings that will be able to compensate for these known increases that are to come. Listed here are the two actions that we are excuse me, ms. La bonte, supervisor avalos. With the savings well expect there will be a need to come back or to find additional revenue after that or we can actually accomplish this project with savings from other projects [speaker not understood] . What i know for a fact, supervisor avalos, is there will be a