warning civilians to clear out, while hamas forces them back. allowing in food and water, which hamas steals. abortion, marijuana and state control. all of that and more on the line today as americans hit the polls in several key states across the country. and the results on this election day could provide some big clues about 2024. plus, one month of death and destruction with no end in sight. now the israeli prime minister says israel will maintain control of gaza indefinitely. and a key battle going before the supreme court as justices revisit a landmark case. we are following these major developing stories and many more all coming in right here to cnn news central . we want to take you straight to california where ventura county sheriff s deputies are giving an update on the jewish protester who died after suffering a head injury following an altercation during a protest. let s listen. good morning, everyone, and thank you for being here. this morning as your she
what do you mean by that? brian meadows is going to ask a judge, in a written brief, to get rid of the case, eject the case because under the federal constitution and the supremacy clause clause in particular, he s gonna say that he s immune. as a federal officer acting under color of law, it s unconstitutional for a state prosecutor to go after him. and he thinks that motion has a better chance of succeeding in federal court. i agree with you that the jury pool is probably driving him as well, but i m with you. watch the e. jean carroll case, where a juror who had minister who listened to a far-right podcast, or sat on that jury and yet was one of the people who agreed that donald trump had defamed e. jean carroll and sexually assaulted her. i don t think that her lawyers were convinced that that would happen when they knew that he was on a jury. and yet a group of attentive jurors from all over the new york area, not just manhattan, also found donald trump liable
do you think that s what driving this? i think partially that and also a view that to the extent that meadows has any shot at getting rid of the case on motion practice, it s going to happen in a federal court and not a state court. why? stop one second. what do you mean by that? brian meadows is going to ask a judge, in a written brief, to get rid of the case, eject the case because under the federal constitution and the supremacy clause clause in particular, he s gonna say that he s immune. as a federal officer acting under color of law, it s unconstitutional for a state prosecutor to go after him. and he thinks that motion has a better chance of succeeding in federal court. i agree with you that the jury pool is probably driving him as well, but i m with you. watch the e. jean carroll case, where a juror who had minister who listened to a far-right podcast, or sat on that jury and yet was one of the people who agreed that donald trump had defamed e. jean carroll and sexual
transcripts of the nixon tapes. he wanted the tapes themselves. he gave a long press conference where the public could see him and evaluate him and judge him, the man, instead of just reading a brief. so he was defending that decision and why it was a priority to him. exactly. it was long and in very plain language. and as the medium, he did it on television. wasn t just a written brief. if you re trying to counteract the forces of congress, the forces in donald trump and his allies in already spinning what is happening with jack smith and the justice department, it is useful to take your opportunities where appropriate to explain what you re doing. to have more of an educational communicative function as the special counsel. so robert mueller and the
television. wasn t just a written brief. if you re trying to counter act the forces of congress, the forces in donald trump and his allies in already spinning what is happening with jack smith and the justice department, it is useful to take your opportunities where appropriate to explain what you re doing. to have more of an educational communicative function as the special counsel. so robert mueller and the investigation you were part of never spoke until he spoke before congress in his retort. you think that special counsel jack smith should speak to the public about key moments in the investigation regularly? daily press conferences? weekly? i don t think i would say daily or weekly. if you look at archibald cox, that was a key moment where it was really important to explain to the american public. here s an example of something