i m not sure how much of a difference that is. but they re sharing these pictures of women and what have you and these horrible e-mails on work e-mails, at least allen was. thank you, ken. i appreciate you joining. and good job on writing that story and breaking this. i want to bring in now cnn contributor bob costas. bob, good evening to you. he s resigning. my first question i want to get to you, though, ask you, the players, some of the players who he offended, jon gruden, actually stood by him. i wonder how those players feel now after all this trove of e-mails have been uncovered. yeah, i guess the first, which was the insulting comment about demaurice smith with obvious racial implications, maybe some players who know gruden in a different context and in a different way were inclined to give him the benefit of the doubt, say that was ten years ago, trying to be funny, it was awkward, however they want to rationalize it. but i think it s important in any of these situations that
Detailed text transcripts for TV channel - FOXNEWS - 20190118:20:57:15
archive.org - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from archive.org Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
the timing is really interesting, because we re headed into a lame-duck session. when the new congress comes in, republicans will no longer control these committees. this is certainly something that the president has called on multiple times. the fact they re suddenly bringing this back up at the very last minute, the very last time they could possibly do it, the timing feels incredibly political, frankly. at the same time, to also have ivanka s e-mails come out right snow, you have this question of, is it a double standard you re not also investigating ivanka s e-mails? there s another committee on the hill that will investigate, the house oversight committee, chaired by trey gowdy. he does want to hear why the first daughter apparently send hundreds of work e-mails on a personal e-mail, but the two investigation will have to wrap up incredibly quickly. there s less than 20 days
done it, comey has done it and now ivanka has done it. what i suspect is a whole lot of other people are using the integration of personal e-mails and work e-mails, which gets tricky. the only people who could tell us if there s a security violation are the people that trey gowdy says we need more information. we re going to have to look at this in the context of was there a violation of national security. and i don t trust ivanka s lawyers or ivanka or president trump to tell me how there hasn t been such a violation. it need to be looked at. it seems to be reviewed in the same way they called jim comey up to testify. you say him on thanksgiving day. he got a request from the house to testify, and i suspect they ll do the same from ivanka, which is correct, and let s let the chips fall after they re looked at in the proirp light.
for somebody in her decision. and are the democrats justified in their resistance to that and their intention to investigate? it s remarkable that a president who ran half of his campaign on the fact that hillary clinton had this private e-mail server, was sending work e-mails from a private account, to be in a position, that not just his daughter, but a senior member on his team, has e-mails on her private account. the reason they were able to find her e-mails is she didn t have them on a private server. there are differences. but legally, you re not supposed to have documents on your personal e-mail or personal computer. they are sensitive. they could be classified information. that can be a threat to american security. but also, we have mid-level managers in government getting jail time for fined for far less explicitly bad circumstances in where they put a work e-mail on
vimarsana © 2020. All Rights Reserved.