two huge ms. stakes. real quick. a bunch of house people, congress people sent the president a letter saying they don t trust him to make a good deal with iran on the nukes, right? he is going to get a deal regardless of what congress says. today we will be transparent. make sure they see it still not committing to a house and senate. he knows it might be a deal that they simply won t support. is he going to push ahead and maybe take it to the u.n. by the way not to the congress. better chance of getting it ratified there. all right. plenty of fodder for us, henry, you know what i mean? plenty of fodder. keep you are not cheap. plenty more ahead as the factor moves along this evening. very bad news for younger americans. apparently they don t know anything. laura ingraham has been studying the studies and next, outraged can rock stone magazine be sued over a firestone gang rape story?
were yesterday, hey, i was with mitch mcconnell we have to really weigh in here. we have to have a role. then things got politically out of line. this is not going down the right road. exactly right. it undercuts the aim of people who would want to caution and be skeptical of this deal. the bottom line we don t know what a final deal is until it s done. that s what s so unprecedented hear this is an ongoing negotiating. and every action taken needs to be put aside against what s the alternative, the practical alternative? what are we really talking about here folks? and this letter, which is largely political theater actually undercuts goals that might be bipartisan. i think it helps it. honestly you think the hard-liners in eyeiran who see the president at the table making concession after concession after concession knows he has to go back to his congress and that he has an untenable congress who won t support what the president is negotiating. i think he s in a stronger position
thought your rough and tumble style, jersey politics style, that they thought this would please you? no. that this was for you? no. i don t believe it was for me. is this personal? listen, i don t believe it was for me. well, i think when diane sawyer went up to the high c, she was expressing what a lot of us would call skepticism. nobody believes you create a culture without the boss leading that culture. you re all serving at the pleasure of the boss. you become the operative of the boss. that s right. that s the job description. the idea they could create this check list of who is with us, the enemies, which mayors won t support his re-election, and which ones will, who gets their bridges shut down, who doesn t, that was supposed to be creative writing by the staffers who didn t get their governor right. and yet that s christie s public manner. that s the way he behaves in
senator collins said it s a good first step. i certainly didn t expect the plan developinged my colleagues is anything set in stone. we continue to work and modify it and broaden support. but i wouldn t be surprised if elements of it form the basis for the compromise that finally brings this impasse to an end. bill: looks lonely in that big hall, doesn t it? her plan would have funded the government for six months, extended the debt limit through january of next year. martha: meanwhile lindsey graham raising new concerns about his chamber passing a budget and a debt ceiling deal that the majority of the house gop won t support, putting speaker john boehner perhaps at risk. watch. if you want to go on offense it has to come from the house. the last thing i want to see happen is a bad bill pass the senate that goes to the house where majority of democrats vote for it and minority of republicans vote for it, putting john boehner s speakership at risk.
authorized now. it is potential it s always possible given what happens in syria down the road, the administration may have to come back to congress, but there s no way that congress is going to leave that door even a fraction open in terms of the resolution they put forward. since john boehner is not whipping this, are you hearing from leader pelosi and are democrats going to go to the mat and give the president what he wants or do you think enough democrats would turn their back on the president and damage his credibility overseas? it s going to be a very close vote i think just as it was in the british parliament. probably we won t know the yeahs and the nays until they re called. there s a big block of republicans who won t support it. there will be a sizeable block of democrats who are war weary, as i am, but who don t believe in military action even in support of the humanitarian cause. so that leaves a pretty narrow window in the middle that the president is going to have