the nra supported gun control legislation in the 20th century. this has been manmade, this has been created by multidecade strategy on behalf of gun manufacturers, the nra and right wing politicians to make people care about this in a way they didn t care about it 50 years ago, they assumed the government would regulate guns and ammunition, and what you can have and where you can take them. this is a creation. they want to make you believe there s a state of nature in the country that people can have whatever guns they wanted. that wasn t the case with assault weapons, as recently as 20 years ago. what you have to do is you have to keep this in front of voters. you have to be hard hitting and hold people accountable, so they can t shirk accountability, if they don t get things done, and then you have to get out there and do the work to make this a voting issue in a way that it just hasn t been in district after district and state after state in this country. we know soft public opinion
violence on a tv camera. our colleague, tom llamas, has more sfl now that i m 18 and of the age to vote, i have been paying attention to what s going on. reporter: recent shootings compelled her to speak out. for me, it s kind of close to home. i had some friends that were part of parkland shootings. luckily they were able to make it out, and i think it s crazy, i was maybe 14 or 13 when that happened, and still nothing has really changed. we are back with ben rhodes and curt anderson, ben, i didn t get to you before the break. i want to start with you here. you know, i have been asking people about these examples in culture, whether, you know, it s country music singers or athletes in major league baseball or in other sports, whether they change the complexion of this in a meaningful way. there s also next week, the victims parents, the survivors of uvalde, and buffalo. shootings are going to be testifying before the house oversight panel. they have another special kind of cred
the votes of some republican senators who joe biden called out again in his speech last night. in order to get anything done in the senate, we need a minimum of ten republican senators. i support the bipartisan efforts that include small group of democrats and republican senators trying to find a way. but my god, the fact that the majority of the senate republicans don t want any of these proposals even to be debated or come up for a vote i find unconscionable. biden outlined a series of changes he wants congress to pass, including banning assault weapons and high capacity repea for gun manufacturers that limit their liability. while these proposals stand almost no chance of making it past a republican filibuster, democratic senator chris murphy, the leader of a bipartisan group of senators toiling away at a compromise bill offered
it s made them fiercely determined and more innovative. just because they can navigate the obstacles doesn t mean they should have to. citi is committed to investing in opportunities for 10 million women globally by 2025. right now, we re all feelin the squeeze. we re having to get creative. find a new way. but birthdays still happen. fridays still call for s mores. you have to make magic, and you re figuring out how to do that. what you don t have to figure out is where to shop. because while you re getting creative, walmart is doing what we always do. keeping prices low for you every day. so you can save money and live better. our students, they re our top priority. and students are job one for our superintendent of public instruction,
middle or so much to be uncovered? more indictments. in navarro more important for his role that what everyone thinks about his rhetorically. speculate, sort of did, speculate add second ago. of the view that the way to read merrick garland and read the doj s behavior, build our case from the ground up. start bottom. build to the top. this indictment would be consistent with that. if there were, trying to make the case that s what they were doing. you would say, peter navarro makes a lot of sense moving up the chain, if that s where they move up. consistent with that theory? and other i can t say how high the chain goes. just following it. there are other strands we know that it was a navarro aide who let in outside trump lawyers who were agitating for the thwarted military plot i mentioned and that aide lost his credentials