common sense laws, but you have to do the work not just when there s a mass shooting or an election around the corner, you have too that work in a sustained way to change attitudes and make this the kind of identity issue people vote on on the same way they have voted on other issues that have driven elections in this country. we don t have enough time to discuss the issue i want to discuss with you, but i want to raise it to hear what you think. it has come up everywhere in my life, i have been raising this, and now jeh johnson, the former head of homeland security for barack obama wrote an op-ed saying this very thing which is we need to shock the system, and a real shock to the system, all of this is now white noise for people, and what would be the shock of the system, an emmett till moment, open casket funerals for the kids who have been shot, pictures widely disseminated, people have to know what an ar-15 does shot 6 feet away from the face of a 9-year-old. that s the only kind
you know, this notion that trump, the way he was tweeting, the way he was behaving, knowing that pence had been whisked to safety, just what we could see from the outside, on january 7th, trump willing to throw pence to the lions, you guys have now reported this out. it turns out, trump was saying things that validated those darkest kind of perceptions behind the scenes to mark meadows, according to your reporting and this sets up the notion that mark short, a very smart guy, sort of saw it coming, saw the writing on the wall. i mean, you think about what a darkly pathological place the white house was in these days immediately before and immediately after january 6th. that s stuff of great novels. what does the committee do with that? what does it mean for the committee and the case they re trying to make and the story they re trying to tell the american people over the course of the next month? there are a couple of investigations i ll be interested to see how they
trying not to comment on january 6th. issue a broader attack on, know, claiming that the committee is illegitimate inship way. like these lengthy letters we ve seen from people like minority leader kevin mccarthy s leader, or jim jordan, fighting against complying with the committee. i am not necessarily sure we ll see a massive groundswell in favor of peter navarro who has been pretty out there, even in comparison to other of these house freedom caucus members and right wingsers. and who thought a trade adviser, a humble trade advisers would be this controversial. he suggests yet he might still be open to cooperate with the doj, with you on the air? said discussions he wavered. didn t sound like someone who knew he would be indicted today but sounded like someone who was trying to convey more validity
saying, hey, we need you down at court, we ve got a warrant for you. i would have gludly come. what did they do? they intercepted me getting on the plane, and then they put me in handcuffs. they bring me here. they put me in leg irons. they stick me in a cell. by the way, just historical moment. i was in john hinckley s cell. they seem to think that kws like an important historical note. that punitive. what they did to me today violated the constitution. in my lawsuit. in my lawsuit, i discussed going back to nixon gsa and other cases that what this government is supposed to do when they ve had an issue such as they ve had. this is not the first readio they ve had. they ve had plenty of people i am a devotee of breaking news but only so mitch bug-eyed
compelling figure, still, awfully risky thing to do. you just reported we know when speaks in that interview last night, our third, he was under sealed indictment. it s under seal because through the process of our federal government they determined that he was flight risk. he does not cooperate, which is, of course what he was indicted for. and that s why as you report he was somewhat dramatically apprehended and arrested on emergency basis. mr. bannon, has many issues with the government still able through his lawyer to come in peacefully. not arrested and apprehended that way. mr. navarro represents himself. told us last night. he thinks he doesn t have to respond because he thinks it s invalid. already that s been acknowledged, validity. it s a lawfully authorized committee with subpoena power. two, ask what he s up to?