through as we speak, thousands of panls of classified material has been released. and some of cnn s best journalists are on that, as are many other journalists from around the country. the administration says that breaks the law, what they did. and it could also put military personnel at risk. so i want to bring in paul rykoff. he really believes this is part of an anti-war agenda. we have to look at wikileaks itself. it s run by an anti-war activist who said he s bent on ending the war in afghanistan. and this supports his agenda. we re a little disappointed the mainstream media is running with this information like it s facts on the ground. this pro-vie a very incomplete view of what s happen on the ground, and it s a component.
they re not complete and don t give a clear picture. here s a piece of sound i want to share with you in. and understand that julian assange is an anti-war activist who has repeatedly cast a very unfair light on the american military and on the american population in general. in s a lot of heat going in that direction. that s an american war veteran. he s coming up, and he s saying to my industry, as journalists, we all need to take a breath and consider the source here. and when does the public s need to know trump the political leanings of a website like wikileaks. the pentagon papers, the new york times got a hold of raw documents that revealed the true depth of the u.s. involvement in southeast asia and the ways the
and i think we really need to look at julian assange who has called for full transparency, but is running an organization under a vail of secrecy that runs outside of u.s. regulations. he doesn t disclose his primary sources. there s a bit of hypocrisy coming out of the wikileaks. to be fair and i don t have a dog in this fight, i don t care either way but everything i read from general jones and everything i read coming from the white house, it doesn t sound like they re saying this is all made-up crap, we don t believe it. we think that the media community should ignore it. as a matter of fact, they seem to be saying they re bothered by the fact that it s out there, but they re not putting it down. well, i have yet to talk to anybody who s made their way through the 91,000 pages, including the people from wikileaks themselves. that s a pair point. we ve got to put it in context and make sure there s no information out there. and i would argue you do have a dog in this fig
we keep lists and we also connect to you on social media. you tell us what s going on, we report that as well. don t believe the smear hype. julian works for truth and transparency. he s referring, of course, to wikileaks founder. nothing more, nothing less. few honest men left. here s another opinion. politicians don t like the public knowing the truth, especially lieberman. let it leak. consider it patriot act for americans. number three. really, are you surprised by the revelations? rick, if you are naive, you would trust pakistan, but it would beizer to be skeptical of
insurgents using stinger missiles. iran s connection, pakistan s connection. why didn t we know these things. should we know? i really only just scratched the surface. the wiki leak. what is it? we ll take you through it. bp may claim its biggest victim. is tony hayward out? you have a duty as a public official to act as a fiduciary, using your upmost good faith and loyalty to the tax payers. when you pay somebody $800,000, what s the basis? how can they pay each other so much money legally? you re taking our money and you re paying each other! a screamer of a rick s list coming your way.