We are serving a population where it wasnt 80 80 are either employed or looking for paid jobs. They are parttime students. Really they are just taking a full close look course load and working parttime. We know theres 26 who to work 26 plus hours. That was a survey that was done in 2019. Having disabilities, being of color, being trans, they are probably the ones working these jobs. If you are giving away access, multiple access to education, they would have to transport themselves to the college and we probably will not have any enrolment. Students will not have access to educations. Is that something we are ready to take away from people . From a population that is already marginalized . I am all for Affordable Housing i grew up living there. This is not aggressive enough. Im sorry, it is public land pick 100 of it should go to Affordable Housing. We know that the cost of land in San Francisco is incredibly high. Why would we privatize it . We should be asking for a more aggressive p
Committee and on the association and im speaking for the board today. I want to address a particular aspect of the environmental report and that is alternative c. Thats opening to vehicular traffic. You want you to urge the Planning Department to support this alternative. As currently planned, there are two openings for vehicular traffic in and out of the reservoir site and a third access point would be provided. Mitigating some of the lockedin nature of the suit. When it was concluded that thisd reduce bottlenecks into the neighborhood and this would extend site traffic and can be acom datad withouaccommodated ig neighborhood. The draft states that opening this would redistribute traffic from ocean avenue and fredda calloway resulting in transit delay and this would provide emergency vehicles better access. Further, it would result project generated Traffic Volume at lee avenue which is identified in the draft report as a troublesome intersection with a lot of projected congestion. In
I want to put this picture here because you see so many pictures of this parking lot completely empty. We need to have a counterbalance. Of course, its not always this fall but more towards this end of the spectrum than the empty lots you see in the developers promotional materials. Lastly, in the january 9t january 9th meeting melina cohen says this, quote, i believe avalon bay will create a lot of problems for this. Thank you, maam i apologize those that are relationships in labor and many times they have come here, our labor parters have come here and havent hired labor union do the job. It should be mandated to use local union labor. S thank you. Thank you, next speaker. Monica collins. This is prepared. The scir states transit delay introduced by the project will be i insignificant and this is based on delay on part of the consultants. The performance standards allow for a fourminute delay for an entire route but the travel from the reservoir along fredda spawc llowafredda callowa
Chair peskin good morning and welcome to the San Francisco county Transportation Authority meeting for today, tuesday, january 9, 2018. Happy new year. Our clerk is mr. Alberto quintanilla. Mr. Clerk, if you could please call the roll. Clerk item one, commissioner breed. Cohen present. Commissioner farrell. Farrell absent. Commissioner fewer. Fewer absent. Commissioner kim. Kim absent. Commissioner peskin. Chair peskin present. Clerk commissioner ronen, present. Commissioner safai. Present. Commissioner sheehy present. Tang present. We have quorum. Chair peskin all right. Could you, please, read the Consent Agenda and then well take Public Comment on the minutes. Clerk items two to three compromise the Consent Agenda. Item three was approved at december 12th Board Meeting and considered for final approval. Staff is not planning to present, but presenting if desired. If a member objects, any items can be removed and considered separately. Chair peskin is there anyp on item two, the minu
Was supervisor ronen. We need to have a fair democratic process that goes along with this. This is not about identity, this is about fair process. Right now, San Francisco has seven out of ten Homeless People that once had a roof over their heads, one of the worst income inequalities in the world. The average latino family in the district making 25,000 a year, yet we have white people making 150 k a year. We can house all of these people, but we need to have a fair process, and right now theres a lot of trauma that goes on with the residents of San Francisco because they dont feel they can trust that democratic process right now. We need to appoint an incident ram mayor and get a legally binding contract with the city and county of San Francisco so that way we dont have this caretaker mayor that can actually run in the future, so thats all im saying with that. But i really urge the city and county of San Francisco to have a fair process. That way, its unbiased, with the three candidate