The appropriate plantings there and encourage the project sponsor to eliminate the stair penthouse. Second. Commissioner fung . Commissioner moore . Mr. Lum, could you explain why the unit that is on the top, which now gets the roof deck, and i agree with the shaping of the roof deck and the possible elimination of the penthouse, why does it also need to have a deck the lower level . The main level . That is correct. It accentuates we had to do a setback for that because of the 30foot, 10 foot rule that says if you are doing in averaging of the rear, the building cannot be any taller than 30 feet. It has to be setback 10 feet to the 40foot height. The only other choice would be that would be a roof. It doesnt seem like a very nice thing for the living room to look upon. Or the walkable part of the roof would be smaller than bringing the deck all the way to the edge, because i do believe that the utilization of that roof, by a balcony all the way to the edge does not look much more mass
We are serving a population where it wasnt 80 80 are either employed or looking for paid jobs. They are parttime students. Really they are just taking a full close look course load and working parttime. We know theres 26 who to work 26 plus hours. That was a survey that was done in 2019. Having disabilities, being of color, being trans, they are probably the ones working these jobs. If you are giving away access, multiple access to education, they would have to transport themselves to the college and we probably will not have any enrolment. Students will not have access to educations. Is that something we are ready to take away from people . From a population that is already marginalized . I am all for Affordable Housing i grew up living there. This is not aggressive enough. Im sorry, it is public land pick 100 of it should go to Affordable Housing. We know that the cost of land in San Francisco is incredibly high. Why would we privatize it . We should be asking for a more aggressive p
I want to put this picture here because you see so many pictures of this parking lot completely empty. We need to have a counterbalance. Of course, its not always this fall but more towards this end of the spectrum than the empty lots you see in the developers promotional materials. Lastly, in the january 9t january 9th meeting melina cohen says this, quote, i believe avalon bay will create a lot of problems for this. Thank you, maam i apologize those that are relationships in labor and many times they have come here, our labor parters have come here and havent hired labor union do the job. It should be mandated to use local union labor. S thank you. Thank you, next speaker. Monica collins. This is prepared. The scir states transit delay introduced by the project will be i insignificant and this is based on delay on part of the consultants. The performance standards allow for a fourminute delay for an entire route but the travel from the reservoir along fredda spawc llowafredda callowa
Reporter it is cool right now. Once the sun get hit gets here its going to be another hot day and livermore. Their Community Center will be doubling as a cooling center. Around the corner they have the aquatic park that will also be open. We were talking earlier about pg e. They say their equipment is heating up in this really hot heat throughout the bay area. Their natural cooling periods that usually happens at night just isnt happening this week inland. California independent Service Operator issued an alert and asks people to conserve during peek demand times between 2 pm and 9 pm. Livermore parents yesterday try to do just that. They left their hot house and came to the livermore fountain park. They say complying with cal iso recommendations is hard with little ones. Some residents had no power at all. By evening pg e said about 12,000 customers lost electricity in the bay area. We use a little a c in one room and a fan. That was really effective. He kept the a c at 78. Target and
Supervisors meeting unless otherwise stated. I want to thank our sfgtv staff for televising this today. We have 3 items on the agenda. We have had a request to move item 3 above item 2. Is there any objection to that, colleagues . Please call item 1. Item 1. Changes to the planning code, uses, signsing building features, floor area ratio, parking and compliance in specified use districts. Council member olague colleagues, thank you very much for giving me the opportunity to be here. Today i am respectfully asking the Land Use Committee to split file no. 110548 for the purpose of making a minor change to the planning code in my district, specifically the ordinance that once its split moves forward if you agree with our request, would amend section 231 of the planning code to awill you for greater size and depth from a corner for limited commercial uses in the rto Mission District. Currently these uses are allowed to have a depth of 50 feet from the corner and a size of 1200 feet occupie