of course, it s his. there s a minor profile, too, but we can t tell who. is that the same as no trayvon martin? no. and we don t know who that is, we don t know if it s a cop. you know what, if this is what the state has, this is the kind of evidence that says to a jury they don t have a case. they are used to seeing csi. well, they have a case. they ve been putting a case on. i don t know. a lot of people would say every single one of these witnesses has been defense witnesses and the state is merely putting all the evidence in front of the jury and letting them acquit george zimmerman. isn t that a brilliant maneuver, put it front of the jury and let the jury decide. it s the way it s supposed to work. midwin charles, when i watch hours upon hours of a dna expert, sometimes my eyes cross. you and i get to see it all the time, so we know what s coming. these jurors might be seeing it for the first time. is it too much for them to grasp the critical aspects of it? well, i th
is there property that is jointly owned? right. the fact that he is a convicted criminal is not in and of itself indicating of fraud. that s the condition of uscis. i ll give you 15 seconds to rebutt that. look, we re not in a position to say it s fraudulent or not. but the point is they agreed to get married. somebody proposed. we can t tell who. and they hadn t even met in person. now, we ve got a big problem with marriage fraud and the public interest would not be served if she s able to spring them early and then he goes out and commits another crime. so in the end, we have to be very careful about giving, you know, marriage benefits when there appear to be objectively some real problems with what s going on here. all right. guys, you did an effective presenting both sides. thank you very much. what do you think? should she get a green card? e-mail us right now, friends at foxnews.com. meanwhile, he s the top dog of