for some reason i have images of walking with cowboy boots, talking i m the law. it was my immediate image. but you know what? think about it. the problem is that it was never about what was common sense and logical. that s the frustrating part. it was never about that. because you know it s going to be spun. now suddenly, it will be a criticism of this doj being political, and that wasn t the case before for the prior doj and attorney general. they re going to talk about. so sometimes i think the point is to frustrate. the arguments come out, don, oh, well, here is the explanation for why this is. i might think the point is to frustrate. because logic has shown its face since january 7th. yes. but today with the charges from these are the proud boys or the oath keepers. right? oath keeper. these are the oath keepers. i don t think there are any oath keepers that are blm, antifa, so
you ask that. i interviewed the michigan secretary of state earlier this week on this same question. she actually indicated that some of these people might actually have been misled by some sort of higher authority thinking they could have used this as a recourse to overturn the election. clearly that wasn t the case. the national archives rejected these alternate slates as did vice president pence. but the fact that they did this helps shed light on how exactly all of these efforts to overturn the election at the state level came into play at the time. ali vitali, nick wu, thank you for your reporting and introducing us to this infrastructure metaphor that we will continue when the president speaks later in pennsylvania. we will bring you his remarks when he starts speaking. later, we ll have new reporting also that trump allies are trying to recruit a controversial musician to run for congress. we ll talk about that after this. any minute now, president
and what president biden has done already in his appointments to the lower courts is he sort of broadened the professional background, federal public defenders are getting on the bench. that wasn t the case. private practitioners who did civil rights work are on the bench. that wasn t so often the case. so before we even get to issues, i think looking at people s diversity, not just as demographic diversity but diversity in life experience and their professional careers are really important. let me ask you about the state of the democratic party, the state of the democratic senate and how s everybody getting along. is this an opportunity to sort of calm the waters? do you view this as an opportunity to sort of lower the temperature, maybe build back better can get negotiated without everybody watching, while everybody s attention is on this? is this a useful interruption, if you will? you said it better than i would have. really, i was really
was so weak that it would collapse without our help. is the president lying there or was he just given bad information? no, he was absolutely lying to the american people, just like he lied about the fact that all of the americans are over there that wanted to leave left. obviously that wasn t the case we saw with miriam and her three children and others we rescued during our time on the ground there. think what he says there, do i trust the taliban? no. what has really changed? he s trusting the taliban enough now to run the government and to give hundreds of millions of dollars and humanitarian aid he happenings will trickle down to those suffering, which he know will never occur. the entire operation in itself, he calls great success was failed from the beginning. secretary austin and blinken is the brain child of failed jpoa
you know what, i wish i could say that wasn t the case, but that is my life for 20 years and i have been turned down for things strictly because of working in the adult film industry. i m currently re-signed, and i know that s going to come with a whole new set of problems. the truth is that s legal. other things michael avenatti wanted to introduce was canceled checks for me to the irs that i paid when i got my book advance. and i never got to stand up for myself and say, well, i paid my taxes, did you? you know, like, it is just it is just crazy to me that he created all of these side shows and created doubt. he mentioned while i was on the stand, you re an actress, you did porn, you re used to rehearsing lines and faking things. like, really? okay. i wonder if, look, if the jury does come back and say he s guilty, do what do you think is the appropriate punishment here? what kind of prison time do you think you should serve?