prevent, hinder or delay the execution of u.s. law by force. two or more people who conspire to overthrow the u.s. government or, quote, prevent, hinder or delay the execution of u.s. law by force. what s that sound like? january 6th. the doj charging the leader of the far right extremist oath keepers stewart rhodes and ten others. the charge carries 20 years max in prison. according to the indictment rhodes allegedly stated if president-elect joe biden were able to assume the presidency, and i quote here, we will have to do a bloody massively bloody revolution against them. that s what s going to have to happen, end quote. and we saw the oath keepers in action january 6th. we saw it with our own eyes, right? it played out live on our television sets and we got the video thereafter.
we re going to get to all of it. but now i want to get to this investigation. i want to bring encnn s evan perez with more on these landmark charges from the doj today. and i think that s a good way of putting it, evan, landmark. and the level of detail in this 81-page indictment is stunning. is it clear now that the justice department is going after not just the rioters but the planners? yeah. that s, i think, one of the things you ve come away from this document, don, and you see that for all the criticism that you ve heard of the attorney general, you know, there s been a lot of work going on behind the scenes quietly to try to build as they usually do in these cases, to build from the ground up. and one of the things that strikes you when you read this is that, again, we focus a lot on what happened on january 6th. and this idea that we ve seen in all the other court cases that what this was about was about impeding and stopping the certification of the vote count
you re believing is bs. for some reason i had an image walking with caw boy boots talking about i m the law in these parts. that was my immediate image. you know what? think about it. the problem is it was never about what common sense and logical. that s the frustrating part. it was never about that. because you know it was going to be spun. now suddenly it s going to be a criticism of this doj being political, and that wasn t the case before for the prior doj and attorney general. it s sometimes i think the point is to frustrate, and so the arguments come out, don, they re like, well here s the explanation for why this is. i might think, you know, the point is to frustrate because logic has shown its face since january 7th. yes. but today with the charges from these are the proud boys or the oath keepers, right? the oath keepers. these are the oath keepers. i don t think there are oath keepers blm and antifa and so on
for some reason i have images of walking with cowboy boots, talking i m the law. it was my immediate image. but you know what? think about it. the problem is that it was never about what was common sense and logical. that s the frustrating part. it was never about that. because you know it s going to be spun. now suddenly, it will be a criticism of this doj being political, and that wasn t the case before for the prior doj and attorney general. they re going to talk about. so sometimes i think the point is to frustrate. the arguments come out, don, oh, well, here is the explanation for why this is. i might think the point is to frustrate. because logic has shown its face since january 7th. yes. but today with the charges from these are the proud boys or the oath keepers. right? oath keeper. these are the oath keepers. i don t think there are any oath keepers that are blm, antifa, so
and find out what your case all when a truck hit my car,ade. the insurance companyed, wasn t fair. eight million i didid t t kn whahatmy c caswa, so i called the barnes firm. i m rich barnes. it s hard for people to k how much their accident case is worth.h barnes. t ouour juryry aorneneys hehelpou a chilling charge. the doj filing seditious conspiracy charges against the leader of the far-right extremist group the oath keepers and ten others. what may be the final nail in