Testimony before congressional investigators, they say he told the Senate Judiciary committee that he personally had not had any contact with wikileaks during the campaign. He also said he could not recall anyone else on the campaign having contact with wikileaks. The Senate Judiciary Committee Earlier this week published a letter in which they say specifically that Jared Kushner not only received an email detailing his contact with wikileaks, but then forwarded that as well. That letter signed by Dianne Feinstein and Chuck Grassley also claims that Jared Kushner failed to provide them with certain key documents they requested. Some of them specifically pertaining to wikileaks. The attorney for Jared Kushner abby lowell put out a statement saying senators are asking Gotcha Questions. Heres what he told us. This is a classic Gotcha Question. Mr. Kushner was asked if he has contacts with wikileaks. Gucifer or d. C. Leaks, and he said no. He said he didnt know of any such contacts from th
Disciplined or removed from office only by the personal action of the Attorney General. But according to the white house, the president has been advised he, he can terminate Robert Mueller all by himself. Does he believe he has the power to fire Special Counsel Robert Mueller . Certainly believes he has the power to do so. Most legal experts believe he would have to order Deputy Attorney general rosenstein to fire mueller and corefuse. I know a number of individuals in the Legal Community and including at the department of justice said he has the power to do so but i dont have any further announcements. They told me, ive asked. They said its rosenstein oversees is the Special Counsel and only he has the power to fire the Special Counsel. Again, weve been advised that the president certainly has the power to make that decision. I cant go anything beyond that. Weve been advised the president certainly has the power to make the decision. To be clear, the warrants that were executed agains
Is his strategy working . I will ask Legendary Newsman carl bernstein, here to talk about the latest scoop on cohen v. Trump. Whats next for sinclair . Will the angry tweets affect the fccs decision . First, another chapter in the Me Too Movement brought to us once again by rowan farrow, out in print tomorrow is about les moonves and the culture of cbs. Its been eight months since charlie rose was fired from cbs this morning. And now the famed Broadcast Network is again having to report on itself. The New Yorker Magazine is reporting six women have accused cbs chairman and ceo Leslie Moonves of Sexual Harassment and cbs news chairman and current 60 minutes Executive Producer jeff fager allowed harassment. The story is about much more
than moonves, its about cbs as a whole, about how Major Media Companies are still having to reckon with the past about alleged abuse that happened in the past and, in some cases, not too long ago. These are issues that have to be addressed by cbs and by ot
weaponry that could be provided to ukraine. certainly, this is about ukraine, but understand what putin is doing here. i ve read a lot of reporting about, well, why is putin doing this? it s hard to figure out. putin has been very clear going on over 15 years now. he wants to reconstitute the soviet union empire. he considers its destruction a great tragedy. and ukraine is but one step in that. whatever one feels about ukraine and i feel it is very much worth helping to protect, this is about more than that. if we can provide weapons so even if putin does invade it is a very costly invasion that makes it clear to putin and russia that it was not a smart thing to do, that, too, is important. that is why providing the weaponry, aggressive economic sanctions, is important. but i think the president made it clear this morning and i wish he had yesterday, there is no minor incursion that is okay. what the russians did in crimea, what they did in the eastern ukraine in 2014, that wasn t
to turn over 55,000 pages a month. that means all the fiserv vaccine data should be public by the end of september rather than the year 2097, the deadline that the fda wanted. do you feel confident the you re going to get this information and why wouldn t have been okay for all of us to break till 2097 it wasn t okay. it was never okay. they promised transparency but a it came to the vaccine. the fact that it wanted to wake 75 years to fully produce that they d it is troubling. the judge agreed it should be produced this year so that independent sides are free of fda influence can we do the review that data. and we are confident that the fda will comply with the judges order and and produce those documents as demanded.