about connecting that the mueller probe is only about the dossier. and saying mueller is not doing his job. he didn t ask he he was bias or not. and but to me, i don t know that they made a great case, and this is going to go on. i want a promise from you, sir, please. when we learn more, please come back so we can chew on it for the audience. oh, absolutely. we ve got a good audience here. they like to think and are open minded. appreciate it. we re going to have congressman luis gutierrez. he was in that room today and throwing some haymakers of his own. a lot of them against his republican colleagues. but up next, we ve got some good folks waiting to get in on this. perfect people to debate the impact of today. a former fbi agent and a former federal prosecutor. they re here, and they re ready to get it on, next. it is such a good time to kiss
the other agents within the fbi and call out peter strzok and lisa page for what they are. you think your fellow party members did that today in that hearing? well, today it was about the divisive nature in congress. i was in a similar hearing in the energy and commerce committee about the children who have all been united, the kids under age 5. they ve all been united now because the government doesn t confirm that? we have. all of the children that could be reunited with their parents in a safe environment that could be. we ll leave that for another day. we ll leave that for another day. so you were like that in another hearing. let s deal with one catastrophe at a time. you felt in that room today the republicans were respecting the fbi and only singling out strzok? it didn t sound like that. they were not after the fbi. they were after strzok and his bias, and his bias came through loud and clear in those texts. do you think he acted on the bias? oh, i believe you
bias speaks for itself. again, he and lisa page are a stain on the fbi s reputation. i m sure fbi agents across the country shudder when they say the body language and the facial expressions he had today. not really apologizing for anything he did. it was somewhat absurd. but we re talking about his behavior, his demeanor, the texting, the affair. all bad. let s assume it s all bad. it s not the bar. the bar is, i shouldn t believe as an american citizen what comes out of the mueller probe because this guy s dirty, and everything he did was dirty because he was out to get my president. how can i think that after today? what did they give me to go on? well, again, the bias speaks for itself. as comey said it doesn t. you have to show it to me. where did it manifest itself? was he biased when he wanted to push harder on hillary clinton and get her to be in front of a grand jury? i don t get it. why was he doing these competing things, then? well, i mean, even go back to comey,
tools like subpoenas and even calling for her to go before a grand jury? number three, if he wanted to hurt donald trump, wouldn t he be desperate to get on the mueller team? why would he drag his feet? he did. he texted lisa page, one of like a gazillion of them, right? that he wasn t sure that there was any their there with what mueller was looking at and maybe he should stay working on the clinton probe or whatever. why would he do that? as an aside, i believe that there there text works for strzok, that he should have owned it today and says where s my bias? i didn t even know if i wanted to join the probe. i wasn t sure if there was anything there. he didn t do that. i m not really sure why. so that s the take of what happened today if you didn t have ten hours to spend on it. let s get after the political implications with republican congressman from new york chris collins. good to see you, sir. good to be with you, chris. it s been a while. i like this time slot better tha
i brought it here with me because i think it is important that we look at the report. now, this is an exhaustive report, and here s what it says. it says at a minimum we found the employee s use of to be systems and devices to send messages demonstrated extremely poor judgment and gross lack. we found no documentary or testimonial evidence directly connecting the political views of these employees expressed in their text messages and instants messages to the specific mid-year investigation. in other words, what they re saying at this very exhaustive inspector general s report is that although he expressed these opinions, he never used them, nor did any of the other agents involved use them in order to gain the final results of the investigation. they say that s impossible because if you are biased, it bleeds through into everything that you do. you have to also include the i.g. did say he couldn t conclude that there wasn t bias in the prioritization. sure.