look, you don t you don t know being dismissive of the trump movement to their peril. there s no argument that those texts are deeply troubling. the fact that there are five people is now being looked into, there is no question about that. but in terms of helping hillary clinton during the clinton e-mail probe, that s not here. in fact it says the exact opposite. of course it is. it says the opposite. no. it says we found no evidence that the conclusions by the prosecutors were affected by bias or other improper considerations. so they acknowledge that bias existed, but they don t find the connection between the boyias a investigative decisions. i think that s a decision the american people can make and particularly the e-mail from andrew mccabe to the washington office is instructive. andrew mccabe rips this case away from the jurisdiction of the washington field office so a bunch of people at the head shed at the fbi can cook the investigation and that s precisely
cnn s van jones here with the bottom line. i guess let s listen to just what he said because we were on tv. i want to get a take on this. i say that the i.g. blew it at the very end with that statement because when you read the report, it was almost like comey. he goes point after point about how guilty hillary is and then he said, but we re not going to do anything about it. the report, the i.g. report, was a horror show. i thought that one sentence of conclusion was ridiculous. what he s talking about there is the i.g. put out a report that said we found no evidence that the conclusions by the prosecutors were affected by bias or other improper consideration. so we have this 500-page i.g. report where there s a lot in it the president likes, but he decides to dispute the conclusion there, van. well, there s nothing there that nobody should like, let s just be honest. when you have people who are supposed to be doing a professional job and they re having side conversations. but
investigation and its conclusions. so i think there s something for everybody. i think we got to move on. harris: i know you want to move on. i want to complement the president if i may. who sent up kimberly reed to be chair of the export import bank this week to the senate so we could have a fully functioning bank and create and exports. harris: i love dancing myself but we are not going to dance right now. we re going to go back to the fox top story on the story all over the place right now, the inspector general came out and now not only are there the two people, the agents who were there at the time going back and forth with text messages having bias against this president according to text but not you have a widening circle of people and the president was careful not to impugn everybody at the agency at the fbi but he said look at the bias in this. he cannot deny when you call president from supporters and this is in the report, not my
them repeatedly at least one i.t. official lied to them at least twice. but said it was okay because he told the truth the third time. can you imagine getting some deference? harris: i want to step and adjust quickly say, chairman goodlatte on a little while ago said that basically echoing what you re talking about, there were special treatment for hillary clinton in in the email investigation. the democrat that i had, congressman said there s something in here for everyone and he has no idea what other reason james comey would have, wasn t bias, must ve been some other reason. your thoughts? stick is there something in there for hillary clinton to the extent that james comey was willing to throw her under the bus a little bit in order to send his reputation and his institution from the obvious charges of corruption that were going to be leveled as a result of trading. so while hillary clinton was ultimately protected because of corruption in the justice department and the fbi, james
manafort s defense attorneys at these new charges lacked any merit and said in the court filing the text messages cited by the special counsel do not establish any witness tampering. and that manafort limited communications cannot be fairly read either factually or legall legally. to reflect an intent to corrupt and influence a trial witness. the judge didn t buy that. revoke his bail immediately, sent him to some detention center. we know not where of but that s where things stand right now. to be what i know you re reading those court documents for the first time and we are going to pull away to really get into it so we can simplify some things. doug mckelway, thank you very much for the latest on paul manafort. now this, president from making big headlines on this friday unloading on the heels of that bombshell doj internal watchdog report calling it a horror show and accusing the fbi of bias. as he spoke with reporters outside the white house just this morning. the president also r