Latest Breaking News On - Wall wouldn t - Page 4 : comparemela.com
Detailed text transcripts for TV channel - MSNBC - 20190122:16:55:15
archive.org - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from archive.org Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
note that i think around 40% of undocumented immigrants come to the u.s. by plane and overstay their visa and that s how they become undocumented. and a wall wouldn t have fixed that. so someone like me i would not it wouldn t have prevented me from being undocumented. and that s something that i think this administration doesn t actually get right, that a lot of undocumented folks don t come in through with inspection they overstay their visas. you were a visa overstay? that s right. you are headed to oxford in the fall. we talk about the legal limbo. one of the things that isn t clear, once you go to the uk, whether you can come back? yeah. and still don t know. last time i was here i was still uncertain how i m going to figure out the legal challenge of going abroad and coming back with some sort of guarantee that i ll be able to return. but the bottom line is this. daca remains one of the most important advances for immaterial grant rights community. and my ability to
the president said come on. he said no. he closed down the government. that s what happened. he can reopen it tomorrow just like he closed it down. it s all on him, isn t it? well, he got elected too. he has a point of view. the fact is that at this point a bill that would reopen the government without some funding for the wall wouldn t get through the senate. if it did, the president would veto it. just as a practical matter, there s three steps. it has to get through the house of representatives, which is controlled by the democrats, has to get through the senate which is controlled by republicans and has to get through a republican president. each side has to give and they refuse to give. shepard: what do you think of the buzz feed report? i saw you with bill and sandra. some time has passed by then. often, chris, when there s these big blockbusters, somebody gets it and another somebody will
fact of the narcotics coming over the southern border, majority of them coming through legal ports of entry through not being smuggled across and between fences. that s not to say it s not a problem. right. but a wall wouldn t necessarily but it overburdens if they have to also think of undocumented immigrants trying to enter irregularly that s a problem. okay. so i m just unclear about what the wall would do. i think the majority of american people are unclear about what the wall would do which is why they do not support building of a wall. i want to reiterate it is not illegal to seek asylum. it is to present yourself. they shut down the busiest port
are killed by heroin alone, 90% of which floods across from our southern border. so the fact is the majority of hard drugs seized by custom and border protection come through ports of entry, either in packages, in cargo, or with people who attempt to enter this country legally. a wall would not stop that. and the majority of the heroin coming into this country is driven across at legal points of entry in private vehicles or in tractor tailors and a wall wouldn t do anything to stop that, either. remember when he told you this? so we have a concrete wall, but you can t see anything, right? a hundred pounds of drugs. they throw it over the wall and it lands and it hits somebody on the head. so you need to have a great wall, but it has to be see-through. so what about those ports of entry?
vimarsana © 2020. All Rights Reserved.