comparemela.com

Latest Breaking News On - Uttar pradesh value added tax act - Page 5 : comparemela.com

Allahabad High Court Weekly Round-Up: February 5 To February 11, 2024

NOMINAL INDEX Raj Kumar Gautam vs. State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Lko. And 3 Others 2024 LiveLaw (AB) 69 Raj Kumar Saroj vs. State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lucknow And.

Uttar pradeshSuresh kumar singhJustice saumitra dayal singhNiraj kumar gautamJustice prashant kumarSagar savitaJustice rajesh singh chauhanJustice shekhar kumar yadavJustice manjive shuklaJustice shekharb sarafRaj kumar sarojShri durga trading coLucknow bench of the allahabad high courtAllahabad high courtSs cribhko shyam fertilizer ltdService tax

UP VAT Act | Where Assessee Has Paid Far More Tax Than Input Tax Credit Claimed, Section 13(1)(f) Will Not Apply: Allahabad High Court

The Allahabad High has held that where assessee has paid far more tax than the input tax credit claimed, Section 13(1)(f) of the Uttar Pradesh Value Added Tax Act, 2008 will not apply.Section 13(1) of.

State of uttar pradeshUttar pradeshJustice shekharb sarafSs cribhko shyam fertilizer ltdHigh courtAllahabad highUttar pradesh value added tax actAdded tax rulesJustice shekharCommercial taxAllahabad high courtUttar pradesh value added tax actXcess tax paymentInput tax credit

GST | Technical Error Without Any Financial Implications Do Not Attract Penalties: Allahabad High Court

The Allahabad High Court has held that mere technical errors under tax laws without any financial implications should not be grounds for imposition of penalties.While dealing with the case of goods.

Uttar pradeshJustice shekharb sarafSteel authority of india ltdHigh court verdictAllahabad high courtFirst appellate authorityJustice shekharSteel authorityAssistant commissionerCommercial taxMobile squadFirst appellateModern tradersUttar pradesh value added tax actTechnical errorTax penalty

Allahabad High Court Annual Digest 2023: Part II [Citations 257

ORDERS/JUDGMENTS [NOMINAL INDEX PROVIDED AT THE BOTTOM] Beneficiary Of Acquired Land Cannot File Reference U/S 28A(3) Of Land Acquisition Act, 1894: Allahabad High Court Case Title: Rajendra.

New delhiUttar pradeshMadhya pradeshTilak nagarAndhra pradeshIndia generalState of uttar pradeshState of jharkhandUnited provincesShanker prasadJhamman singhDonadi rameshGayatri deviPawan kumar dubeyJustice prashant kumarSurendra koli

Supreme Court Monthly Round-Up November 2023

Citations: 2023 LiveLaw (SC) 932 To 2023 LiveLaw (SC) 1025Nominal Index Indrakunwar v. State of Chattisgarh 2023 LiveLaw (SC) 932Manish Sisodia v. Central Bureau of Investigation 2023 LiveLaw (SC).

State of uttarakhandState of haryanaWest bengalNew delhiUttar pradeshState of delhiTamil naduState of keralaState of uttar pradeshState of rajasthanNational capital territoryState of jharkhandAndhra pradeshState of orissaNational capital territory of delhiIndia general

vimarsana © 2020. All Rights Reserved.