comparemela.com

Latest Breaking News On - Ss cribhko shyam fertilizer ltd - Page 1 : comparemela.com

Allahabad High Court Quarterly Digest: January To March 2024 [Citations 1

[NOMINAL INDEX PROVIDED AT THE BOTTOM] ORDERS/JUDGMENTS OF THE QUARTER UP Victim Compensation Scheme 2014 | Eligibility/ Quantum Of Compensation For Rape Victims To Be Decided By DLSA, Not.

Uttar pradeshSri nagarJammu and kashmirLucknow districtNew delhiIndia generalSouth africaState of uttar pradeshJustice rajesh singh chauhanKhapatiha kalaPrakash shuklaChhintar mal meenaAjay singhAnkita deviHaribhan singhRaj kumar

Allahabad High Court Quarterly Tax Digest: January to March 2024

INDEX M/S Mgs Palace v. State Of U.P. And 4 Others 2024 LiveLaw (AB) 4 M/S. Hindustan Herbal Cosmetics vs. State Of U.P. And 2 Others 2024 LiveLaw (AB) 9 M/S Eastern Machine Bricks And.

Uttar pradeshNew delhiIndia generalJustice shekharb sarafMs sanyo koreatexJustice vivek chaudharyJawahar lal jainRakesh kumar jainAlok kumarGurdeep singhJustice shekharPrakash shuklaJustice saumitra dayal singhNagar ayukt nigamQamar ahmed kazmiMs maa kamakhya

Allahabad High Court Monthly Digest: February 2024

NOMINAL INDEX Nikita @ Najrana And Another vs. State Of Up And 3 Others 2024 LiveLaw (AB) 66 M/S Sahbhav Engineering Ltd. Ahmadabad Thru. Authorised Representative Mr. Pramod Dave vs. U.P..

Uttar pradeshJustice subhash vidyarthiWasim rizviJustice abdul moinDeepak sharmaSagar savitaJustice renu agarwalIsrar ahmadArpit shuklaJustice krishan pahalShivangi sharmaDurga prasadPramod daveUttar pradesh shiaTufel ahamdJustice saurabh shyam shamshery

Allahabad High Court Weekly Round-Up: February 5 To February 11, 2024

NOMINAL INDEX Raj Kumar Gautam vs. State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Lko. And 3 Others 2024 LiveLaw (AB) 69 Raj Kumar Saroj vs. State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lucknow And.

Uttar pradeshSuresh kumar singhJustice saumitra dayal singhNiraj kumar gautamJustice prashant kumarSagar savitaJustice rajesh singh chauhanJustice shekhar kumar yadavJustice manjive shuklaJustice shekharb sarafRaj kumar sarojShri durga trading coLucknow bench of the allahabad high courtAllahabad high courtSs cribhko shyam fertilizer ltdService tax

UP VAT Act | Where Assessee Has Paid Far More Tax Than Input Tax Credit Claimed, Section 13(1)(f) Will Not Apply: Allahabad High Court

The Allahabad High has held that where assessee has paid far more tax than the input tax credit claimed, Section 13(1)(f) of the Uttar Pradesh Value Added Tax Act, 2008 will not apply.Section 13(1) of.

State of uttar pradeshUttar pradeshJustice shekharb sarafSs cribhko shyam fertilizer ltdHigh courtAllahabad highUttar pradesh value added tax actAdded tax rulesJustice shekharCommercial taxAllahabad high courtUttar pradesh value added tax actXcess tax paymentInput tax credit

vimarsana © 2020. All Rights Reserved.