And those were all subject to mandatory dr . No, that was administrative review. It could be. And the dr for those units that were defined as affordable . The dr would be for the ones that are not they dont qualify for the pricing out function. Right do you know how many units that or buildings that involved. Unfortunately, no i dont have that information. Thank you. Okay and those are not just units but singlefamily homes we have 47. Some subset of 47. Colleagues no additional questions why not open up for Public Comment. I have mr. Ted egan. Oh, i didnt see you you were in my line ted egan. Mr. Eagle on can we see the discrepancy were seeing between our email on friday that said Economic Impact and the reports says neutral i dont have it flovn me but it seems to me a change. Supervisor i dont believe our report says a neutral impact we identified this legislation as an impact on housing prices in sub markets the Housing Stock under the belief it bans our review of the permits data si
The time is stuck onto mr. Evocative finished it. He was part of a trustingstill stuck onto minutesanyway he was part of a trusting generation that was lost in 1965. Because of vietnam golf of tonkin rights antiwar demonstration question authority hell no we wont go, 68 the chicago demonstration, was a police riot. In 1970, kent state for dead. Ohio. This was huge antiwar, antigovernment and we still have not gotten it right. We dont need 1971 police levels. I know we have more people but the basically coders. Theyre not criminals. What we need in a police is a Championship Team. Who could look at what we saw on television and root for that . You would have to be a bigot. We need to melt this blue coat. The police need to be part of the trust, the truth, the justice of our community and now we are asking them to be Mental Health guardians also. On the radio today the chief of police was saying in scotland only 5 where guns. Maybe in our twoman teams one is gun free. Maybe in the back o
Correct. Thats correct i thought you were worried about the odds my reference to the arrow shown the drawing. Okay commissioner Vice President richards and i guess mr. Lindsey want to make sure have you looked at the calculations the reason im asking weve done an audience audit inform september but permanent a training issue and 2 of 5 fails the audit there was indeed an audit i want to make sure your comfortable with those calculations. Commissioners i did not personally review those. As motion id like to ask mr. Lindsey to double check the calculations to make sure it is not a demo. Ill accept that as part of motion. Thats fine it looks okay to me. Call the question. Commissioners, if theres nothing further theres there is a motion that has been seconded to take dr and approve the project as proposed with the modifications to the roof deck only and the railing associated with the roof deck to set it back from the edge of the building 3 feet own the west and north side and for staff t
Commission im Marshall Schneider an architect working with the neighbors with the project proposed the neighbors of the proposed project building there are several reasons that warrant commission bans the commissioners, on that motion related to the design decisions lets examine the size the average size on or of the buildings the same zoning is 2 thousand plus square feet open an average lot size and the largest this on the block is currently 3 thousand plus and the lot size of 3 thousand square feet the proposed project is 5 thousand plus the promoted project is one. 5 the size of largest structure on the block and that is more than double the size of average structure per Historical Planning Commission is not grounds for the exceptional or extraordinary circumstances we believe the sheer size the project coupled with the design that the project sponsor neatest the exceptional or extraordinary the first, the decision the project sponsor made to leave the exit facade massing and this
Specifically to mr. Leonards point, can you speak to that one . Oh, sure. Yeah, so, its true, what i was trying to make the case earlier about what were doing at cortland, its true that its not right in front of his flower shop, but it is right in front of the smoke shop there. And that smoke shop does not have parking, onStreet Parking. Around the corn er on cortland, that entire section is a bus zone already for the 24 ~ and, so, by putting a bus bulb at that intersection we are going to be removing his green zone that he has there, the smoke shops green zone there. There is another 10 or so on Street Parking spaceses on the other side of the bulb. Thats right adjacent to the flower shop. Across the street, across cortland where there is an existing bus zone, we will be removing the bus zone putting some green zone there, excuse me, to help offset the [speaker not understood] in front of the smoke shop and then the rest of it will be reverted back to on Street Parking. So, actually a