Bay, and in both instances it looks perfectly appropriate for the building. So i think those are some of the things that i see. I am not opposed to letting this rest for a few more weeks. We do not have to take it up in early january, but certainly i would like the continued dialogue between the comment and community and the developer. This is appropriate use and i see nothing wrong with a building that develop these 27 units, brings 27 new families that will add vitality to the neighborhood. I think that is a very valuable improvement and we have been done the road about the church and how expensive it would be to try to retrofit it. It doesnt economically seem to make a lot of sense. And this is a private project, too. This is not a cityowned project. This is not a project being done by an affordable nonprofit. This is a private project and there is they are responsible to be receptive to the neighborhood and build something that is appropriate to the neighborhood and is supported by
Given back. The community room, the carshare spaces, the three Community Spaces and the trees that were mentioned that are planned to be planted along both larkin and clay street with maintenance included. And the fact that the project sponsor has worked with the neighbors to try to decrease the size. One of the things that we called for and i would encourage him to continue to work with neighbors with particular reference to the adjacent building on clay and the Property Line windows. Although we know these are not protected, if there is a way that they can be worked out to allow light into as many as these as possible, that would be great. Although a lot has been done already. And then on some other issues regarding the redesign not the redesign, but the new project more properly state. One of the things mentioned in the complaints by the neighborhood and others is that typical finishs in the neighborhood are wood, brick and stucco and some of the earlier renderings had a lot of glas
Hall, 416. Tue 11 18 Fidelity Investments 8 30 00 am 10 30 00 am 2. 00 tue 11 18 Fidelity Investments 8 30 00 am 10 30 00 am 2. 00 the next business is item four, matters of Unfinished Business on the september 12, 2014, item four a, approving a variation to the transbay, redevelopment plan, on site Affordable Housing requirement, as it applies to the mixed use, project at 181 freemont street, subject to approval by the board of supervisors of the city and county of San Francisco in its capacity as legislative body for the successor agencies for the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency in authorizing the acceptance of a future payment of 13. 85 million, for the use in the area, and resolution, number 802014. Madam director. Thank you, madam secretary, good morning, welcome back, commissioner and good morning, members of the public and thank you for joining us, commissioner thises item was continued from your last meeting it is a variation on the redevelopment plans, however, the staff an