Where unlike many buildings that we see built particularly the more contemporary ones where we have these appendages off the side of buildings that are decks that sort of look like something that doesnt belong on the building. Mr. Birchels bays are combinations of bays and decks with the infold doors that allows it to become a deck at such time as you wish to have it open to the outdoors. The rest of the time its a bay, and in both instances it looks perfectly appropriate for the building. So i think those are some of the things that i see. I am not opposed to letting this rest for a few more weeks. We do not have to take it up in early january, but certainly i would like the continued dialogue between the comment and community and the developer. This is appropriate use and i see nothing wrong with a building that develop these 27 units, brings 27 new families that will add vitality to the neighborhood. I think that is a very valuable improvement and we have been done the road about th
Ordered them to talk. All right . Now the methodist administrator said we would love to do that and the Attorney Says my client will not sell to anyone unless they pay off johns expenses. Nobody else can buy the site. Tndc nevertheless persifted persisted and i do believe this lawyer would be capable of doing something in that direction. They are the owners of the property still. All right . Or the judge. Brad is following up as i mentioned. There has been a lot of talk about all of this involvement with the community. I havent seen it very much. There are interesting and lively meetings. This discussion did not occur there. It was mentioned negotiations were going on and others could join in the negotiating group, but others didnt want to. Rowena has gone and i talked to the architect and nobody is participating in that. They are not interested in negotiating that kind of project. I went to the preop meeting, you know . Is there any additional Public Comment on this item . Seeing none