from bulletser. that s an anchor asking s question. don t you think trump is a. your reaction. it is always barbing nunez. he s the boogie man. meanwhile they don t go to the substance of the problem. it is remarkable that, you know nunez i think is actually doing the work of the people, in terms of someone having a check on what s gone on in these investigations. it is appropriate that be investigated. it is just remarkable to me. right as t we re looking at this report that has he s redactions that are so ridiculous that even the justice department can t just them. that s why they put them out. you have to wonder everything else they re withholding. consider are they withholding it. they re attack nunez. you think they would attack the people holding back the documents. the oneum fair criticism they make. ultimately the president is in charge of the executive branch and he s got to do, to my mind he s got to do a lot more than tweet he s ing gry there s not
role. she s a senior adviser. she went to the olympics as a senior adviser. she went there with a diplomat mission. she was prepared to deal with north korea, but she s also the president s daughter and she s very unapologetic about that. she talks to him multiple times a day. she s sort of trying to figure out exactly what she can do. one area where she s come under a lot of fair criticism is a lot of people wanted her to be a moderating voice. they re frustrated on is she x or is she y? they thought she could prevent trump from pulling out of paris. she explains she treats herself like any other senior adviser. so, she will not publicly contradict the administration in the way most other senior advisers would not. the interesting thing to watch for, we learned, is she will push for the issue she s passionate about but she ll be silent on the issues where she disagrees. you ll notice she did not sell the republican health care plan
i met people who i never would have met otherwise. led remarkable lives. served their communities. who had deep thoughts about the way their communities and their governments should work. i learned a ton from them. that s really the experience. tucker: funny thing is you told me about this book a couple years ago. i thought it was a really cool idea. now it seems like a completely radical idea that no one would ever do. how do you think having done this and been in the media so long this divide effects the way that we cover news? it seems like most people who work are in the press are from one america but not the other. yeah. i think it s a fair criticism.m i think, so i was at npr for a long time. i still know that the people there try to tell a balanced story. but what i never gave credit for until this time is that they live inside a certain bubble. we all do. and it drives what stories are important and what source they look to. how they think about the story. and it s enormous
wall street bank who are helped cause the crash. a lot of democrats obviously criticize republicans for just completely trying to block then prosecute barack oba president barack obama in his first term. isn t this fair criticism, sounds what democrats are preparing to do. i got to tell you i m all for it. in january of 2009 republicans met in some chteak house in wasn and talked about how they were going to make president obama a one term president. but they got huge criticism from s that now how government. not how we function. i understand that u. but there is a guy. there is no two donald trump. there is one donald trump. which is the campaign donald trump. we see this from the cabinet picks he s chosen. so payback is okay. it is more about being part of the resistance and being part of saying to the american people
reacted after the terrorism took place. strange muted response that occurred to make this seem bizarre. kimberly: fair criticism, bob? should he have been incensed over the loss of american lives and coverup of sort in benghazi? then defending bob: first, i couldn t agree with him more to besmirch her reputation. you ask the united states senators who she was or about it, they couldn t tell you a single thing before this. greg: true. bob: so they pick out somebody to be a scapegoat. why did she appear on the shows? i can t answer that. if she had intelligence from director of national intelligence it did say the video and the original intelligence, but greg: who said it, bob? bob: wait. the idea they will vote against the woman because she went on the talk shows when they have no other sub stantive things to say about her is playing politics, i don t think they have enough votes to stop her. kimberly: do you think her career is stellar andpech