Amateur criminologists. Remember that . The frenzy spun out of control. Soon, liberals were not simply talking about a stolen election but about war, actual war. If russia is going toal keep attacking america, then america really should fight back. There is an entire buildingic in st. Petersburg filled with a Russian Troll Army creating thousands of tweets, memes, news sites comments and flatout fake o stories designed not to take sides on any issue but just to get us fighting about it. Hillary clinton spent overto A Billion Dollars on the campaign, and the russians beat her with 150 grand because they were able to turn facebook into fake book. Bl tucker so you are accusing a Nuclear Armed adversary of committing an act of war and you are doing it purely in order to gain an advantage in a domestic political dispute . No normal person would do that. Its too reckless and crazy. L
with the more than 100 million Hillary Clintons familyo foundation took from uranium one Board Members . She
Unfair Criticism of USA and India Visa Delay or Denial
kaieteurnewsonline.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from kaieteurnewsonline.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
Marvel s Phase 4 Is Better Than Fans Will Have You Think
collider.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from collider.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
Govt Must Say Enough Is Enough and Put a Stop to Recurring Incidents of Hate Speech
thewire.in - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from thewire.in Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
january six? january six? that is a fair criticism. january six? that is a fair criticism. the january six? that is a fair criticism. the committee| january six? that is a fair . criticism. the committee did january six? that is a fair - criticism. the committee did itself no favours by not allowing republicans to choose their own members. democrats would have still control the committee as the majority but it would have removed that argument that this was one sided because it was all either democrats or to republicans that were selected by democrats. i think there is that perspective that it was heavily weighted to one side but that doesn t negate the weight of the evidence that was elicited. the committee should be recommended for the thoroughness of its evidence over the last year and a the doj normally does this work on its own. will it take kindly to be