And on that note, i wish you a very good night. From all of our colleagues across the networks of nbc news, thanks for staying up late with me. I will see you at The End of tomorrow. Vice President Candidate j. D. Vance has a new line he likes to repeat on the campaign trail. You know the big difference between conservatives and liberals . Is that no one has tried to kill Kamala Harris in the last couple of months and two people now have tried to kill Donald Trump in the last couple of months. I would say that is strong evidence that the left needs to tone down the rhetoric. Two Assassination Attempts, attempts in as many months. I think it is time to say to the democrats, to the media, to everybody that has been attacking this man and trying to censure this man going on 10 years, cut it out or you are going to get somebody killed. J. D. Vance wants people to believe it is the Lefts Rhetoric that motivated these attacks. Donald trump has taken it a step further directly blaming Kamala
Vice president ial candidate j. D. Vance has a new line he likes to repeat on the grow know the big difference between conservatives and liberals is no one has tried to kill Kamala Harris in the last couple of months and two people now have tried to kill Donald Trump in the last couple of months. Id say thats pretty strong evidence that the left needs to tone down the rhetoric. Two Assassination Attempts in as many months, and i think its time to say to the democrats, to the media, to everybody that has beena, attacking this man and trying to censor this man for going on ten years, cut it out or youre going to get someone killed. His running g mate, j. D. Van, wants the public to believe it is the lefts reinflammatory Rhetoric Hat has motivated these attacks. Donald trump has taken t it a sp further directly blaming Kamala Harris and President Joe Biden for the attacks. In an interview with Fox News Digital Trump said somewhat inscrutably, they use highly inflammatory language. I can u
of the law. that s one of the things that s so interesting about this book. i don t think a lot of people or i hadn t thought so much about them sort of trying to build coalitions in the supreme court. well, and also, you know, we had known of rumors of the chief maneuvering and changing at least one of his votes, but i also discovered that justices stephen breyer and elena kagan had changed their votes. they changed on the medicaid portion in part because they were worried that the chief was going to flip back the other way. oh, really? there was constant he has said he s only an umpire calling balls and strikes looking at things neutrally, but when you unpack this case, it s really a prime case study of the kind of considerations that go on. that s fascinating. that have to do with the atmosphere at the time, the court s institutional reputation, and perhaps the chief justice s reputation. lots of cross currents going on. it s not so black and white that it s just he
that far, ask onnd once he real that he was going to have to build some sort of coalition between the two competing sides, that s when he enlisted a couple other justices to come up with this compromise that ended up invalidating the medication expansion but upholding the core of the law. that s one of the things that s so interesting about this book. i don t think a lot of people or i hadn t thought so much about them sort of trying to build coalitions in the supreme court. well, and also, you know, we had known of rumors of the chief maneuvering and changing at least one of his votes, but i also discovered that justices stephen breyer and elena kagan had changed their votes. they were worried that the chief was going to flip back the other way. oh, really? there was constant he has said he s only an umpire calling balls and strikes looking at things neutrally, but when you
doing. as you know, i have had many years of experience. it s my job to try to explain things to people. i will not explain it from a particular perspective, just what i think. i will be like a umpire calling balls and strikes. and that is what i have been about my career. nobody will appreciate me and talk me in to nobody will pressure me and not talk me had in to anything. this is not promoting me, this is doing a job for cnn and helping people understand as best i can, the way things work on the inside and sometimes we will talk about stories that have nothing to do with politics that can give people some hope about what they can do to change the world as we have done on your show before. i like all of it. you are always welcome. let s get at it. let s get after it you have to get the expression. it s not go for it. it s let s get after it. all right. here s the first pitch, william barr, do you believe the american people can trust what he said today, he is independent