outside the supreme court our own kevin corke is with us. what is going on? it s interesting. if you had been here earlier in the day you would ve seen a bear of a different crowd, we are talking about primarily female, mostly female, mostly young, very peaceful. but as is often the case in circumstances like this, as the day goes on the crowd begins to change just a bit. more young men show up, more people in tactical gear and masks and dark glasses, shades and that sort of thing. a change in tone of what you are seeing. but thus far all day long, it has been peaceful. and we expect it to stay that way, hopefully, because there is a rather large law enforcement presence along the fence line, at least about 60 that we ve seen. uniformed officers. there are more officers within the crowd. we are hoping for the best but so far we have seen a lot of people, passion, some prayer and mostly peaceful protesting. we will keep an eye on it but back to you. sean: any word on wheth
we will start with you, this group wanting a summer average across the country, it is open season, we know where your operations are, ever since the draft opinion was leaks we have seen the doxxing of supreme court justices homes. we ve now been able to uncover an assassination plot against justice kavanaugh. we now know that where amy coney barrett s kids go to school, we know where she goes to church, we know when she goes to church. that is a responsible enough, those people should be held accountable. however the white house had an opportunity to condemn that fear joe biden s white house and they didn t. why? they did not. today was actually the first time we ever heard joe biden address violence as part of these protests at all. we ve been waiting for him to say something in the two plus weeks since the assassination attempt on justice kavanaugh and god forbid his wife and two young daughters are living in
appoint pro-life constitutionalist judges to the supreme court and that is exactly what he did. promises made, promises kept. take a look. do you want to see the court overturn roe v. wade? if we put another two or three justices on that is really what is going to happen and it will happen automatically, in my opinion because i am putting pro-life justices on the court. i will say this, it will go back to the states and the states will then make a determination. sean: here with more is former florida attorney general, outnumbered cohost kayleigh mcenany and fox news contributor tammy bruce. let me start with you, pam, if i can because president trump, what is interesting, he did something i can t recall another candidate doing as he gave a list of names that he would choose from for the high court and he followed through on that promise. it is very transparent, just like joe biden, we would know he would put a liberal
parents going to school board meetings and speaking their mind. we have heard silence and the doj and the fbi and merrick garland need to step in, find these people and arrest them and i have to tell you, they probably know who they are dealing with already and they ve got to arrest them. these are terroristic threats. to do nothing encourages it. sean: let me ask you, since the release of the draft opinion, we have had dozens and dozens of pro-life centers and churches et cetera attacked. the oregon right to life set ablaze with the molotov cocktail. cocktail. in wisconsin the family action set on fire with molotov cocktails. these aren t just words. they may be a fringe group, we don t know a lot about them, but we do know they have been attacking a lot of places already and this is just based on the draft ruling. that is exactly right. there have been more than 40
fox news, more than 230 times the supreme court has reversed its own precedent. presidents are great, until they are not. yet nancy pelosi stood there today and said it s outrageous to overturn a precedent that stood for 49 years. it s not outrageous at all. it is certainly done in landmark cases, they ve been overturned by the supreme court. in all those cases the supreme court waited until they had an actual case before it which raised the issue. in this case, the mississippi case did not raise that issue. it only raised the issue of whether a 15 week ban was constitutional. it would have been much better to decide that. what is wrong with justice roberts opinion? why was he wrong? there s nothing wrong with being proactive and examining the basis upon which it is total judicial