a hidden agenda of getting on the jury to convict? manhattan as the professor points out is an inherently hostile venue for the accused and in a clinically charged case against an outspoken clinical candidate that is hated especially in manhattan the jurors are predisposed to the outcome is preordained this case should have been moved elsewhere to staten island for example where at least the jury pool could be more balanced but alvin bragg opposed it and so did job mershon no coincidence which is evidence that they both know this prosecution is legally week if not utterly absurd and they are counting on a prejudice jury to convict this is a ratchet abuse of power in our justice system and i agree with the professor this is unquestionably and irrefutably election interference they want to be

Related Keywords

Case , Jury , Professor , Manhattan , Points , Revenue , Candidate , Accused , Hidden Agenda , Jurors , Jury Pool , Outcome , Staten Island , Example , Job , Prosecution , Evidence , Coincidence , Alvin Bragg , Election Interference , Abuse , Power , Prejudice Jury , Counting , Justice System ,