Due, for china it is almost one but that is going to james. Change. Not all this is sustainable none of this is sustainable. The radical position is that we can boycott and we do that against her know that was catching dolphions. Reject a lot of practices because women said we are not buying it. I do not want to be responsible for killing dolphins, period. That we go, the more educated we are, women, vote with your dollars. Thank you very much. [applause] up next on cspan, journalists discussing religion and the Supreme Court. A conversation on crime and guns from the Group Connecticut black republicans and conservatives. And later, the Renewable Energy summit with discussions on climate change, water shortages, biodiversity, and largescale farming. On the next washington journal, kevin on yearend strategies to prepare for filing your 2014 taxes and tax provisions taking effect next year. Deeperwill talk with woods of usa today on College Sports and efforts to unionize of usa berkowitz
Which i thought was entirely appropriate for him to do so. The inappropriate thing for him was for him to go out in public and take a position on something he knew was coming before the court. That i haveher case noticed. This crop of justices loves to opine Public Forums and on what they are doing in their judicial business. Why theant to know Supreme Court is not yet hearing justay marriage cases, follow Ruth Ginsburg around to various Public Forums. She will to you inside stories about what is going on at the court. If they are only granting and the settings of the five cases a year, it seems to me they could grant a few more if they would cut out some of their public appearances. Anybody else on that . Another question . Im hoping the Supreme Court will weigh in on releasing withheld records regarding the jfk assassination. It brings to point an eresting statement made by the cia stood for catholics and action. We are a bit very Roman Catholic culture. I would like to draw a questi
Representing atheists and secular people that scalia dismissed. I believe it was, they will never be satisfied, we dont need to consider them. We were talking about complicity in hobby lobby. This new idea that the catholic majority has brought in. If you make it easier for somebody to commit a sin, that sin can be placed back on to you. The owners of hobby lobby were allowed to not provide contraception. How does that fit in with the concept of the judge as an umpire . Surely, if you have five justices who believe, for example, a portion is a sin if they make a decision that says abortion can be legal, under that same. Of complicity, they are getting a sin themselves. Can they really be expected to make a decision as the umpire . If they are turning around and are on record as saying, that would be sinful . . Anybody . You spoke about that a little bit. Im not an expert on catholic doctrine. I cannot answer that question. In general, one benefit you could say that the Catholic Church
Four years later the squadron was operational and we built nearly 3,000 of them. Compare that to the f22. In 1981 the air force established a requirement for 750 advanced tactical fighters. It wasnt until 2005, 24 years later, that the f22 was first introduced and instead of 750 of them, we bought 195. If boeing can field a new commercial airliner in five years, and ford can take a car from design to production in 24 months, then theres absolutely no reason the pentagon should take two decades to put a new fighter into service. Things have to change. We have the unfortunate tendency to fix organizational problems with more organization. Ive seen estimates that show 1 3 of the acquisition budget goes to overhead costs. This system is so gummed up it is a wonder things come out the other end. To have a military that is strong and agile means that we cannot tolerate the delays and cost overruns that have plagued our procurement system. Every delay means that technology doesnt get to the t
It was finally ratified by the requisite number of states on may 7, 1992, 200plus years after it was originally sent out by congress. It has to do with congressional pay. It provides that if Congress Gives itself a pay raise, it will not take effect until another election. In any event, we know who was president of the United States on may 7, 1992, president george h. W. Bush. So that is a connection between him and the bill of rights. The second also concerns the date. But it is much more than a curiosity. President bush was in office on the 200th anniversary of the ratification of the bill of rights, december 12, 1991. And he took that occasion to point out something that is very important, namely the connection between our bill of rights and the rights of people everywhere. For a long time, what our constitution gave us, a declaration of rights that actually had teeth. That is what is unique about our bill of rights, it actually has teeth, it is actually put into operation, it is ac