Bret okay. Thank you. Good evening. Im bret baier. Breaking tonight, Hunter Biden pleads guilty to charges of avoiding tax payments, Jury Selection was scheduled to begin instead. Lawyers for the president s son requested to change hiS Plea, surprising prosecutors who urged the judge to reject the new course of action. The case follows his conviction in delaware on Gun Charges for which he is still awaiting sentencing. We head to the courthouse in downtown Los Angeles Jonathan Hunt reports on how this case developed through the day, changed. Good evening, jonathan. Good evening, bret. Just about 30 minutes ago. We wrapped up what has been an extraordinary day with Hunter Biden walking out of the courthouse here. Having pled guilty to all nine Tax Evasion and Tax Fraud related charges. As he walked out, he said nothing. He held hands with his wife, melissa, and he left it to his Lead Attorney Abbe lowell to splain why he changed hiS Plea to guilty. Listen here. Hunter decided to enter h
use this in her campaign in terms of when we get to the presidential tv debates? his campaign. i presidentialtv debates? his campaign- campaign. i think president trump has campaign. i think president trump has to campaign. i think president trump has to respond. i campaign. i think president trump has to respond. he i campaign. i think president i trump has to respond. he has an unconstitutional gag order right now. again, thejustice system in new york has been politicised and weaponised against him, so he has every right to respond. the rule of law has been eviscerated, and it s notjust my opinion. these are facts that cnn and so many other expert attorneys have sat and said this was the weakest case against president trump, it should never have been brought. let s be clear, a hush money payment is called a settlement agreement in america. a nondisclosure agreement is not illegal. nobody proved there was a crime committed. the nobody proved there was a crime committed- com
any prosecutor to give the ability to render someone ineligible. i also think to render someone ineligible. i also think at to render someone ineligible. i also think at the to render someone ineligible. i also think at the end of the day, the election think at the end of the day, the election has to be about the future. it s election has to be about the future. it s what election has to be about the future. it s what people are concerned about and the it s what people are concerned about and the more it s about other things the more and the more it s about other things the more joe biden is able to hang out in the more joe biden is able to hang out in the the more joe biden is able to hang out in the basement again. and i don t out in the basement again. and i don t want out in the basement again. and i don t want that. out in the basement again. and i don t want that. what did you make ofthe don t want that. what did you make of the governor s don t want that. w
borisjohnson didn t a suspension of ten days or more. boris johnson didn t want - a suspension of ten days or more. boris johnson didn t want to - a suspension of ten days or more. boris johnson didn t want to find i boris johnson didn t want to find that in boris johnson didn t want to find that in the boris johnson didn t want to find that in the commons, boris johnson didn t want to find that in the commons, didn t - boris johnson didn t want to find i that in the commons, didn t want boris johnson didn t want to find - that in the commons, didn t want to put his that in the commons, didn t want to put his case that in the commons, didn t want to put his case to that in the commons, didn t want to put his case to the that in the commons, didn t want to put his case to the people that in the commons, didn t want to put his case to the people of- put his case to the people of uxbridge put his case to the people of uxbridge and put his case to the people of uxbridge
bragg s case, saying it could quote, could amount to a mereg recordkeeping infraction with reactio n. d auth fox news legal analyst and author of the upcoming book, the trial of the centuryth ,greg jarret and harvard law professor alan dershowitz is with us . greg, let me start with you wrote a column. you said show me the man. we all i ll show you the crime. we ve all heard the statement. yo u indict a ham sandwich and there s a reason for that. and the main reason is theson is defed jurors do not hear from the defense. the rules of evidenc e do nottrial do apply. those that would apply at not a trial do not apply to the grand jury room. you can have hearsay evidence,ay for example, brought in to a grand jury proceeding. pru wrote this column. let s talk about the case and your analysis. look, i think the first f thing that the defense team, i trump s team will do is file a motion to dismiss arguing