Something like 200,000 people here that came to the port of fran and i can clearly see and use the to reach a half a million and im very supportive of this and like i said, i never thought this day would come but its going to happen and im very supportive. Okay search excited about the new cruise terminal but i dont know if questioner excited about the cost. Definitely excited about the new cruise terminal. And just trying to understand the numbers and looking at the proms limits for phase two and the change between what was approved and what is being requested today is free much million . Is 43 million and i know you discuss the may be 11 million . I dont know if we discussed the whole 43 million and where the costs are and why its so much. Okay. Ill take up the 43. 254 million is the estimate for the phase two budget. I think why the costs are so high, i would ask kim to give more details, i think that its a combination of the large site, the cost of reconstruction, and the maritime
Aheads several weeks before the closure and as we get closer to the event within seven to ten days breast we worked with media outlet as round the city to make sure that that information was desseminated. Maria mentioned the mammoth tooth and the arcoko event opened. And that has been since morphing around the bay area. It started at mtcs headquarters and works to ac transit headquarters and now is the a the caltrans district 4 headquarters in oakland. And then of course, eventually it will become part of the Transit Center when that opens. One of our major objectives as always to generate as much positive Media Coverage as we can. We work very closely with our Pr Consultants at Singer Associates in that regard. You see the accomplishments and milestones that generated coverage in 2012. We were able to get good storis in the chronicle, the examiner, the San Francisco business times, the l. A. X. Times, the sacramento bee, broadcast affiliates for nbc, cbs, ab, fox. And as i mentioned t
This agenda. Item 1 is an ordinance amending the San Francisco Business Code to permit permit expirations and extensions and to modify various fees. We have from the department of building inspection pamela levitt good afternoon, pamela levin, Deputy Director administrative services, department of building inspection. The legislation before you is designed it achieve the following objectives. The first is to continue to encourage the growth in the economy by extending the life for review and approval for permit applications for large projects from 360 to 720 days, clarifying the time limitations for permit processing so that it begins when the permit is provided to dbi for review and the clock stops when it is returned to planning for a Design Change that is required by the building department. Extending the period of time for dbi to notify a project sponsor before a permit is canceled, and extending the time for completing all the work authorized by a building permit. The second objec
A ballpark would be fine. Im looking through some of my other departmental colleagues. ~ looking to the 28 Affordable Housing fee which is based on up to 190 units at the Building Height of occupiable 480, in the range the number is approximately 115 million. Thank you. Thank you, supervisor. I do have a breakdown of i just want to and then i have a comment. We can get copies to Committee Members as well. Im not sure if the developer can provide that sheet. But it is a combination of the Affordable Housing fee, the downtown at work, School District fees, the Mexican Museum core and shell, the operating endowment, the garden payment that you had mentioned, the garage bond redemption. Right. On top of a mixture of some Pedestrian Safety requests and open space requests that were made, including paying into basically the Transit Center district plan open space fee which is 1. 6 million. And, so, how many whats the total . Approximately 115 million. Now, the garden payments, we were given
Your feet. It is time for San Francisco to have 24hour secured diversity working. Yes we can. Are there any members of the public that wish to speak on behalf of the project sponsor in any language which you choose. Okay. Seeing none, why dont we hear back from our rebuttal by the appellant . Thank you, president. Tom again, one is that the Public Benefit being provided to the city is good for the city but they do not mitigate a significant i am mpact that have a shadow in open square. Only one of them shadow that. The adequacy of eir is before you. You have to find that the eir complies. Whats happening here is interesting. The report is dated may 8th. 1 day after you deny the appeal and certify the eir, the source of the new information that there are in fact feasible alternatives or mitigation measures that would reduce that Significant Impact of shadowing. You have to contend with the fact that you have an eir that ignore that issue, actually have that information withheld until th