Table [speaker not understood] page 32 that would amend in the words i dont have the preexisting language. Hang on just a second. Let me get that page 32. Where its actually about in cityowned garages, the language would be in the middle column where it currently reads none are required, however, if class 1 spaces that can be rented on an hourly bases are provided, they may count towards the garages requirement for class 2 spaces. Essentially, its regulated between class 1 and class 2 spaces in publicly owned garages. We want to change that language, if class 1 spaces that can be rented on an hourly basis are provided then it counts towards garages requirement for class 2 spaces. And with the department of parks and traffic we have to request a waiver from the Zoning Administrator who will be doing the enforcement on these policies moving forward. The Second Amendment would be on page 51 actually, page 52. And that will be roman numeral small ii, for requirement, the new language will
Devices. All documents included as part of the file should be submitted to the clerk. Items acted upon today will be acted upon in the january 29, 2013 board of supervisors meeting unless otherwise stated. We only have two items on this agenda. Item 1 is an ordinance amending the San Francisco Business Code to permit permit expirations and extensions and to modify various fees. We have from the department of building inspection Pamela Levitt good afternoon, pamela levin, Deputy Director administrative services, department of building inspection. The legislation before you is designed it achieve the following objectives. The first is to continue to encourage the growth in the economy by extending the life for review and approval for permit applications for large projects from 360 to 720 days, clarifying the time limitations for permit processing so that it begins when the permit is provided to dbi for review and the clock stops when it is returned to planning for a Design Change that is
You are correct,in con hill doesnt have a cac in terms of the streetscape plan, this is a fairly old image, here there was a series of meetings actually, Public Meetings there, where the result was a ranked list of the Capital Improvements that they wanted to see so we are using that in that case. Thank you. This is showing the haight street, were also looking at pedestrian improvements along market, franklin and golf street and were working with a developer at 2001 market and looking at pedestrian improvements at dolores street as well that they would build as part of the in kind agreement. This is showing what was built as part of in kind revenue converting hays street. Eastern naipbds neighborhoods has a number of projects. Through the board adoption of that plan we were required to spend 80 percent of fee revenue on a set of predefined priority projects. In that case, that happened through the plan adoption. Several of those are moving forward, notablely the ipic report or the ipic
Will be acted upon in the january 29, 2013 board of supervisors meeting unless otherwise stated. We only have two items on this agenda. Item 1 is an ordinance amending the San Francisco Business Code to permit permit expirations and extensions and to modify various fees. We have from the department of building inspection Pamela Levitt good afternoon, pamela levin, Deputy Director administrative services, department of building inspection. The legislation before you is designed it achieve the following objectives. The first is to continue to encourage the growth in the economy by extending the life for review and approval for permit applications for large projects from 360 to 720 days, clarifying the time limitations for permit processing so that it begins when the permit is provided to dbi for review and the clock stops when it is returned to planning for a Design Change that is required by the building department. Extending the period of time for dbi to notify a project sponsor before
You will see the full budget next fiscal year and it will automatically update to current fringe rates thank you. So if there are no questions at this time, why dont we open this item up for Public Comment r. There members of the public who wish to speak to items 7 and 8 . Seeing none, Public Comment is closed. So we have a few amendments before us. Recommendation for amendments for 1 and 2 i guess 3 was with drawn. Great, so we have a recommendation to the two items, or actually to 12119 per the budget analysts report. We have a motion to accept both recommendations 1 and 2 and 3 was withdrawn so well not take this [replts ]ation and we can do that without objection. To the underlying amendment as amended, supervisor avalos recommended forwarding without and we can do that without objection. Thank you. Well be looking at the budget that comes forward with a lot of interest. So thank you very much for all of your work. Do we have any other items before us . That completes the agenda. B