In the future. Its my way of saying thank you also congratulating our folks for coming her theyll pride themselves not only that the Center Offers but the ideas and have a good time to elapse for our middle schools and industry and education we begin to match up the skill sets for the 21st century jobs and technology is going to be absolutely necessary and to learn and have fun in doing so with more skill sets you may have not to have. So thanks everything and detective mayor of corky got to be the grand marshall on stds in ireland over a year ago did you ever see a chinese less than con laughter it was our way of creating this and we have 18 sisters cities their president to create opportunities of business and investment all over the world and they look to San Francisco to be a really Great Partnership thats another great reason why you kids are really lucky to be in the city and im the lucky to be your mayor and parents mayor, i want to do things that secure your future you can look
This is a fantastic option. Im in favor of the program obviously were going to have a earthquake this is from an investment stewardship. After a few minutes with folks even if you dont agree you understand the concept. Weve talked about being able to do this now were going to be forced to do this its a good thing but to pay for it. Its not only protecting their property but every dollar is for mitigation it truly is protecting our investment overall the city. Its the right thing to do. You can look at the soft Story Building and theirs like the buildings that collapsed in the earthquake and your shufrtdz to see this people are getting caught to get this done and if people can find a place in our homes of shelter it will keep people in their homes. Together well work out of getting out of 0 disaster and making the community bringing back to what we love. As a level of folks weve talked about we make recommendations to make everyone mitigated their soft story problems no other jurisdicti
Walkers and their pets are [inaudible] gg nra and forced to relocate to see dog parks, the problems associated with this type of overcrowding that thats why that information is needed. As the other speakers have indicated, one of the Core Functions of the National Recreation area is in fact recreation. Obviously, it has to be balanced with preservation of resources and most importantly, taking into account the human environment. The human environment is the bind defined under National Environmental policy act as to be interpreted comprehensive to include the natural and physical environment and the relationship of people with that environments. Thats not what happened here. We complained to the park service that there original plan basically said emma the quality of urban areas is not, not a significant factor in determining a dog management policy for the gg nra. We made comments on that and it reappears without any change in the current plan. I think you have it absolutely right supe
Behavior abnormalities and dogs are due to underlying anxiety and exercise is the foundation to curbing most of these anxieties. For example, the amount of exercise the dog receives can affect his or her behavior, tradability, and his aggression levels. These are of course, important considerations to maintain Public Safety in crowded urban environments. Off leash exercise benefits all of San Francisco not just dog guardians and their pets. A supervisor winner has suggested, the gg nra closures will likely result in very serious overcrowding of San Francisco in the dog parks. The city parks are already quite limited and off leash areas are particularly scarce. The San Francisco spca we frequently hear from our Community Popular off leash areas such as the auto park Mission Dolores park and mclaren park are already very crowded. As guardians dog walkers and their pets are [inaudible] gg nra and forced to relocate to see dog parks, the problems associated with this type of overcrowding t
Okay. So i would move friendly amendment. Make the motion. To grant the appeal, revoke the permit based on a defect in the application and ask that dbi through the nova process tin to work to resolve the misrepresentations and the one year bar does not apply to that. The defect permit. Sounds like intental misrepresentation i dont want of the multiple levels of conduct. But i still want to see it resolved. It can be resolved though by taking down what they on the wrong and waiting a major. I wouldnt impose a year its beyond the defect. We have to deal with the 4 and 4 and 3 and 3. Thats my motion. Can you repeat that. laughter . I can i mean. So revoke the permit on the basis or finding of the misrepresentation of the permit application with the diversify for the dbi to work with the permit holder and that the one year bar should not apply. Thats my motion. You didnt rise that. No, we were having a discussion. A debate. And a persuade unsuccessfully. Did he need to repeat any of that.