Walkers and their pets are [inaudible] gg nra and forced to relocate to see dog parks, the problems associated with this type of overcrowding that thats why that information is needed. As the other speakers have indicated, one of the Core Functions of the National Recreation area is in fact recreation. Obviously, it has to be balanced with preservation of resources and most importantly, taking into account the human environment. The human environment is the bind defined under National Environmental policy act as to be interpreted comprehensive to include the natural and physical environment and the relationship of people with that environments. Thats not what happened here. We complained to the park service that there original plan basically said emma the quality of urban areas is not, not a significant factor in determining a dog management policy for the gg nra. We made comments on that and it reappears without any change in the current plan. I think you have it absolutely right supe
Behavior abnormalities and dogs are due to underlying anxiety and exercise is the foundation to curbing most of these anxieties. For example, the amount of exercise the dog receives can affect his or her behavior, tradability, and his aggression levels. These are of course, important considerations to maintain Public Safety in crowded urban environments. Off leash exercise benefits all of San Francisco not just dog guardians and their pets. A supervisor winner has suggested, the gg nra closures will likely result in very serious overcrowding of San Francisco in the dog parks. The city parks are already quite limited and off leash areas are particularly scarce. The San Francisco spca we frequently hear from our Community Popular off leash areas such as the auto park Mission Dolores park and mclaren park are already very crowded. As guardians dog walkers and their pets are [inaudible] gg nra and forced to relocate to see dog parks, the problems associated with this type of overcrowding t
Plan the new plan was still cut where you can walk with your dog on and off leash by 90 . It will still ban dogs entirely and on leash from threequarter of ocean beach. It was still banned from hundreds of acres for concerts. If you can make such major changes unitas audible called credible reason to do so. The new plan still offers no evidence that dogs cause any serious problem or significant environmental damage. Instead, it still talked about that may might or could happen but offers no proof that any of these impacts are now or whenever occurred [inaudible] in the 50 years that dogs have wanted. The new plan still has no thorough study of impacts on city parks in which you asked him to do in 2011. Other areas that are currently off leash adjust ocean beach and for constant alone, the new plan will ban dogs entirely, even on leash, from a total area that is roughly 5 times larger than the area of all the awfully space and can persist a bit city parks combined. Thats just the propos