Some from before earnings, and some from after positive interviews, so i know what im talking about. Recently we had five ceos come on mad money. They all fit the bill, the narrative is exactly what im talking about. First up was tom faulk, ceo of kimberlyclark. His company showed tremendous growth, no matter, the company said it projected the headline number 2016 earnings of 595 to 615, but the wall street looking for 6. 40. I dont know i read the notes. I heard the press release, listened to the Conference Call and read the analyst comments. It seems like kimberlyclark had a lot of good things to say, there was some onetime missions that i do my best, by the when i do this work, because im convinced the holders of so many stocks are renters, really. That to take your cue from the immediate action is just plain stupid, so i noticed the fact they had fallen from 127 to 122 off the quarter until the interview began. Right at the top of the interview, i asked him pointblank, did the decl
Talking about. First up was tom faulk, ceo of kimberlyclark. His company showed tremendous growth, no matter, the company said it projected the headline number 2016 earnings of 595 to 615, but the wall street looking for 6. 40. I dont know i read the notes. I heard the press release, listened to the Conference Call and read the analyst comments. It seems like kimberlyclark had a lot of good things to say, there was some onetime missions that i do my best, by the way, not to look at the stock when i do this work, because im convinced the holders of so manywh stocks are renters, really. That to take your cue from the immediate action is just plain stupid, so i noticed the fact they had fallen from 127 to 122 off the quarter until the th interview began. Right at the top of the interview, i asked him make any sense to him at all . It for a close today. The sellers they were just plain wrong. Next up, lets talk clorox. Heres a similar situation. Sill love the quarter. Because it showed som
Some from after positive interviews, so i know what im talking about. Recently we had five ceos come on mad money. They all fit the bill, the narrative is exactly what im talking about. First up was tom faulk, ceo of kimberlyclark. His company showed tremendous growth, no matter, the company said it projected the headline number 2016 earnings of 595 to 615, but the wall street looking for 6. 40. I dont know i read the notes. I heard the press release, listened to the Conference Call and read the analyst comments. It seems like kimberlyclark had a lot of good things to say, there was some onetime missions that i do my best, by the way, not to look at the stock when i do this work, because im convinced the holders of so manywh stocks are renters, really. That to take your cue from the stupid, so i noticed the fact they had fallen from 127 to 122 off the quarter until the th interview began. Right at the top of the interview, i asked him pointblank, did the decline make any sense to him a
Narrative is exactly what im talking about. First up was tom faulk, ceo of kimberlyclark. R, thepa said it projected the headline number 2016 earnings of 595 to 61 i dont know i read the notes. I heard the prs nference call and read the analyst comments. It seems likkimberlyclark had im way, n to look at the stk wh mediatadeyom ttiw, aim it for a close today. The sellers they were jus next up, lets talk clorox. Heres a similar situation. Sill lth incredible margin improvement because energy costs were way down. Demand was good. Terrific. The news flash was bleach haha the stock immediately get obliterated, falling from 131 to 4. I asked what the heck is happening here . Whats the deal . Solobbered . D he had beaten everything he was i puzzled over a line item. Uignora. And i promptly called the mp decline in clorox ridiculous. It was. Memo to the idiots who sold it. The stock has gone for 124 to me 131 im confident it can take out that high. 13 ain. He sat right here. That was by far t
Do enough to break the strangle hold . On a day when the stock market got clobbered dow plunging 208 points, s p plummets 1. 56 , nasdaq down 1 pant 58 because oil shot down almost two bucks. I believe the answer is a resounding yes. Thats yes if the company happens to be mcdonalds. And the ceo is steve easterbrook, the brit who took over the helm of the fast food giant and is responsible for a huge part of the rally from 100 when he became the ce o in march of 2015 to today when the stock bolted to an all time high of 121 before closing at 119 up 80 cents. How many stocks hit a high today . Not many. Its hard not to see it this way considering the global same source sales rose 5 . United states increase add phenomenal 5. 7 . Thats extraordinary. I was looking for 4 . People thought i was having a happy meal dream. How did he accomplish this . First, he decided what mcdonalds needed, could be the united states, was a simpler menu which would lead to fewer mistakes. Maybe two or three f