That got clobbered when they reported earnings and roared higher. As people seemed to predict the bad news. Overlook it, or just said, hey, maybe it wasnt as bad as i thought. These stories are behind a lot of the recent rally. Including today with the rally 212 points. I ignored the fact that Kimberly Clark had fallen from 127 to 122 off the quarter, until the interview began. Right at the top of the intervie you just asked point blank, if the decline made any sense to him at all. Because it sure didnt make sense to me, given how well the company was doing. He promptly agreed. We went over not only was the quarter a miss, so to speak, but there were many line items much, much better than expected. It seemed obvious, that i did a little homework. They did the big pirouette and surged from 122 to 133. 50, hitting an alltime high. The sellers they were just plain wrong. Next up, lets talk clorox. Heres a similar situation. Sill love the quarter. Because it showed some incredible margin i
Longer term if the stories change oar even better. Some from before earnings, and some from after positive interviews, so i know what im talking about. 5 to 615, but the wall street looking for 6. 40. I dont know i read the notes. Listened to the Conference Call and read the analyst comments. It seems like kimberlyclark had a lot of good things to say, there was some onetime missions that i do my best, by the way, not to look at the stock when i do this work, because im convinced the holders of so manywh stocks are renters, really. That to take your cue from the immediate action is just plain stupid, so i noticed the fact they had fallen from 127 to 122 off the quarter until the th interview began. Right at the top of the interview, i asked him make any sense to him at all . It for a close today. The sellers they were just plain wrong. Next up, lets talk clorox. Heres a similar situation. Sill love the quarter. Because it showed some incredible margin improvement because energy costs w
Change oar even better. Some from before earnings, and some from after positive interviews, so i know what im talking about. Recently we had five ceos come on mad money. They all fit the bill, the narrative is exactly what im talking about. First up was tom faulk, ceo of kimberlyclark. His company showed tremendous growth, no matter, the company said it projected the headline number 2016 earnings of 595 to 615, but the wall street looking for 6. 40. I dont know i read the notes. I heard the press release, listened to the Conference Call and read the analyst comments. It seems like kimberlyclark had a lot of good things to say, there was some onetime missions way, not to look at the stock when i do this work, because im convinced the holders of so many stocks are renters, really. That to take your cue from the immediate action is just plain stupid, so i noticed the fact they had fallen from 127 to 122 off the quarter until the interview began. Right at the top of the interview, i asked
Today the dow gained 212, nasdaq advanced also. How they can think so much longer term if the stotoes change oar even better. Some from before earnings, and some from after positive interviews, so i know what im talking about. Recently we had five ceos come on mad money. They all fit the bill, the narrative is exactly what im talking about. First up was tom faulk, ceo of kimberlyclark. His company showed tremendous growth, no matter, the company said it t ojected the headline number 2016 earnings of 595 to 615, but the wall street looking for 6. 40. I dont know i read the i heard the press release, listened to the conference calal and read the ananast comments. It seems like kimberlyclark had a lot of good things to say, there was some onetime missions that i do my best, by the way, not to look at the stock when i do this work, because im convinced the holders of so many stocks are renters, really. That to take your cue from the immediate action is just plain stupid, so i noticed the f
Advanced also. How they can think so much longer term if the stories change oar even better. Some from before earnings, and some from after positive interviews, so i know what im talking about. Recently we had five ceos come on mad money. They all fit the bill, the narrative is exactly what im talking about. First up was tom faulk, ceo of kimberlyclark. His company showed tremendous growth, no matter, the company said it projected the headline number 2016 earnings of 595 to 615, but the wall street looking for 6. 40. I dont know i read the notes. Listened to the Conference Call and read the analyst comments. It seems like kimberlyclark had that i do my best, by the way, not to look at the stock when i do this work, because im convinced the holders of so manywh stocks are renters, really. That to take your cue from the immediate action is just plain stupid, so i noticed the fact they had fallen from 127 to 122 off the quarter until the th interview began. Right at the top of the intervi