prepare discovery and for those who are anxious and think they 1!u■r■qqhat criminal accountability sooner, it s really important to remember that time is part of what the rulee■ç■ of law means. so people do have to be patient and understand that is whate1 it means to approve the rule of law and uphold american values. what does ite1 mean to americanse1 that a former this way this reminds me very much the conversation that you spearheaded the other night, which is we aree1 joining a numr of countriesç■ñ■ around the glo where people are held to account regardless of whether they are in thex■ highest possible stati, as is the case of israel, orç■
there s one study published in mother jones going backçó to 19. now, people define mass shootingsçó differently. thise1 study looked at 137 incidents and found in two cases were there female shooters, going back to 1982. the secret service withe1 a different definition of mass shootings in public places examined 173 attacks from 2016 to 2020, and found theu invoflment of five women. what the profile, what the motive was. the fear is that the kindzv■ñiñ behaviors, the mental health crisis-motivated behaviors that we re seeing inçóñi a lot of ma mass shootings can be migrate to go females as well, and that is a very alarming e1development, chris. so rob, talk to me a li24 motive here. obviously we re all familiar
opening fireq on the fbi. this is a different choice than sort of trying to avoid being in donald trump s bad graces,ty$ic1 we have seen mccarthy do and others do. thise1 is different. this is somebody who is veering well outside of the lane of lawfulness. the whole idea of there will be death and destruction if i m arrested. he had an image he posted on is now being taken down where donald trump was holding a bat and the guy in the picture cropped next to him was the manhattan d.a., alvin bragg. alvin bragg got a death threat today, i will kill you. so we have crossed the line. and look, i have this is akin to an isis and al qaedai] recruiter radicalizing people to do violence on theirt( behalf. donald trump is doing it on his behalf. i m not over the top by saying that. i have talked to extremist experts who said that is true. here s the funny thing to me. i don t believe gopfát( leaders
states. mr. commissioner, thanks for ñt)ju)u$ us this morning.q what is the case for banning tiktok outright in the united states? what are the risks you see? yeah, well, obviously tiktok is an immensely popular application. i think that s part of what we see with representative bowman talking about. it sq incumbent on government officials to speak clearly about the real national security threats, and tiktok is not just another short forme1 video application where you can seee1 dances and other memes, it sq operates a sophisticated surveillance tool. it s pulling search and browsing history, key stroke patterns, potentially biometrics, including face prints and voiceprints. we re told officials don t worry. all of thise1 is stored in the u.s., and some cases it doesn t exist in china, and this past summer, buzzlp feed news had a block buster report that had internal audio reports, that everything is seen in china, and that exposed their representations as nothing more than gaslighti