Welcome to the San Francisco remote hearing for october 22nd, 2020. On february 25th, there was a state of emergency related to covid19 on april 3rd, 2020 the Planning Commission received authorization from the Mayors Office to reconvene remotely through the end of the shelter in place and this will be our 27th remote hearing. They require everyones attention and most of all your patients. If you are not speaking, mute your microphone and turn off your video camera to enable Public Participation sfgovtv is broadcasting and streaming the hearing live and we will receive Public Comments for each item on todays agenda. Comments or opportunities to speak during the Public Comment period are available by calling and entering the access code. When your item is reached and you would like to submit Public Comment, press star 3 to be added to the queue. Each speaker will be allowed up to three minutes to speak and when you have 30 seconds remaining you will hear a climb indicating your time and
The pier 740 master plan which eventually led to historic core, it resulted in those buildings being rehabilitated and rfp that resulted in brookfield taking over the waterfront site as our partner on that location and the next slide, built on to that process in 2013. Our planning and Environment Group developed a crane cove park plan. You can see here its very similar to what ultimately has been delivered on site which is very exciting. And the kneass building was not addressed with use it might serve. Building 49 was. Its in the center of the slide. We opened it would be used for water recreation and bicycle parking on site so were not sure if we need additional as well as a site and next slide. Please. There are eight goals that apply to the southern waterfront and weve pulled out throw in particular that we think really speaks to what might go i go ine buildings. Number two listed in the staff report has to do withens hancements water recreation and enhancement to the blue green wa
Our temperatures are in the 40s for santa rosa. Upper 50s for the rest of the area. As you go through our afternoon, sunshine inland warming up to the mid to upper 80s and around the bay, low to mid 70s with a mix of sun and clouds. The clouds will stick around. A fire weather watch for the north bay and that goes into effect at 11 00 tonight until 8 00 a. M. Wednesday due to gusty, offshore winds. Some extreme fire danger and i will talk more about this coming up in a few minutes. But it is definitely a foggy start on the bay this morning. It sure is that is reflected in our goldengate camera. Just kind of hovering over the Golden Gate Bridge as you work your way into San Francisco. It is not affecting traffic too much. Just keep that in mind. 15 minutes ago from Richmond San Rafael bridge down into San Francisco. It is bearable but foggy and we are seeing some fog at the bay bridge, as well. Chp mentioned it, as well. Be careful out there, this morning. Today is the deadline to regis
Even. Good to see you both. Thank you for joining us. Start with masks this evening. The mask issue became huge this weekend. Friday, 1 00 a. M. , when the president tweeted both him and his wife had tested positive for coronavirus. University of washington study projects that 160,000 more people could die by january 1. But that number could be reduced 95 of us were masks. Do you supporting mask mandate, where it is legally permissible . A mandate . Yes. I dont supporting mandate. I think there are appropriate guidelines people should follow, and certainly, within confined spaces, yes. I think it is appropriate to regulate what is going on. Guidelinesppropriate people will follow. I checked both of your twitter accounts regularly. I checked yours on thursday, october 1. There was a photograph of your shoulder to shoulder with a staffer, shoulder to shoulder and comedian, lenny clarke, inches away from five customers at the owl diner. None of them had masks. You didnt have a mask. How i
Team. Can i comment . Yes, please. I did leave it high level to work identifying who would sit on that task force. So, i did not specify it but depending on the discussion here with my colleagues, they feel it would be best serving. Its the super inten department is creating the task force, not lowell in and of itself. So, just president sanchez, i would be supportive of examining and evaluating the letter that i had read into the record including evaluating the culture. Sorry if im dragging this on. Since its made by the superintendent, would it ensure student representation is on this task force . Yes. Yes, is this dated in the amendment. It has including but not limited to students, families, educators, administrators and communitybased organizations. Students are first mentioned. So, to clarify, like, im just, theres a letter but im not clear on how specifically the staff is supposed to implement the task force based on a letter that was not written for this purpose. So im confused