Little bit of that luxury of time to plan so that when we know the amount of money thats well have a menu of things we can do and depending on how much funding the cpuc allocates to the cca, theres a little bit of argument, as you can imagine, between pg e and ccas between who gets the public good charge money and how much and that hasnt been settled yet. Thats why barbara hale and i have a hard time planning our budgets for additional resources. We know what we have now and as kathleen said were fully expected to keep going where we are now, but that additionality is tough and its tough no know how much and when. Whether its legislative or not, the voice of this body needs to be heard at the California Public Utilities Commission. I mean if you look at whats going on internationally now, theres tremendous understanding that Green House Gas production emissions happen at the city level and we are fully equiped to make those happen if we have the freedom to do it right and thats the mes
Market rate luxury housing in San Francisco. Im not sure, the majority of these buildings are they going up with systems that are actually noncarbon, are they actually maximizing efficiency, are we seeing solar on these buildings . And if not i think its worthy of putting some requirements on especially the market rate luxury housing that the exploding the city to be able to put these requirements on them and i think the department of the environment weighing in on that would be really helpful. We are definitely excited about the opportunities for heat pumps replacing combustion heating for water heating and space heating. There are real and solar water heating, of course. Unfortunately for tall high rise buildings once you get over about 10 stories, the possibility of being able to have much solar access on the roof is extremely diminished because they have a lot of needs for ventilation and other things through that roof top, so theres a lot of competing needs plus the size and the d
Timeline . So they are currently evaluating at the cpuc having a rolling timeline and not a set timeline. Oh, good. Okay. Were hoping that with our by filing an application during this year well be able to be rolled in to that rolling process. And youre right, historically they did have like a 3 year set time frame where there was a window you would get in and then youd have to wait. And because, from our perspective, and the wonderful thing about bay run, as you know, commissioner mar, is that its a proof of concept. In a way its a pilot of what the kind of comprehensive programs can be. Right now bay run is a very small amount of money. Energy watch is about 7 million to bay runs 450, 350,000. So its a very small window of whats possible but because weve already done it as soon as theres sort of that mental sufficient evidence of launch, you know, where we are very confident this is going to be real, then were going to start planning. As you know for any program to launch theres a to
Rafael just mentioned. Im very, very pleased. Thank you. Thank you. Im curious, moving forward, what kind of action legislatively that might be needed from lafco or the board of supervisors to help strengthen the work that can be done with Energy Efficiency moving forward. Do you have any recommendations that are coming forward for us . Beyond be what director rafael added, yes. Anyone else from staff . Barbara hale, assistant general manager for power at the sfpuc there may be an opportunity for you to lend your voices of support to our efforts to get california puc authority to expand pg e rate payer dollars to expand our Energy Efficiency. There may be an opportunity there to engage. We werent at this point envisioning bringing any specific legislation for Energy Efficiency to this body or to the board. That could change but at this point we werent anticipating that. Thank you. Cca program. Im not sure if youve identified funding that was approved by the voters in the Housing Trust
Fairness board, they have agreed to meet on april 17th. Thats earlier in the schedule as opposed to later so we were late on the ledge reform but were early on the not to exceed rates, we heard a lot of interest in advancing that and were responding to that by advancing the schedule to that. Im not sure theyll be able to vote on that, theyll be comfortable on voting on that the first time they hear it, but we will be prepared to bring it to our commission shortly after the rate fairness board adopts it, it will come to our commission. We are on april 14th bringing to our commission the policy, the Program Design and proposed not to exceed rates so thats at our next puc commission meeting. Well be making that presentation and getting feedback from our commission before we take it to the rate fairness board. So thats, again, april 14th. Im sorry, thats proposed. Program design. For light and dark . Correct. And Program Design. Right. And by Program Design i mean whats the portfolio of re