The math makes sense, you would say 50 watts but unfortunately the program is only able to claim and incentive ieds that smaller amount because that is the amount thats above the states title 24 code base line. This is something that weve been able to break through with the barren program and something we hope to do with other programs. The bay run has given us this interesting proof of concept. The success has been remarkable. In 18 months of bay run we have served 9500 residential units. Its built on our expertise with programs. Bay run is flexible, comp prehence and accessible. Weve expanded on this longterm model of energy watch but we want to do more for all our customers moving forward. We think that cca gives us the opportunity to do that. We want to more completely account for and incentivize project savings. We know that we might not start right away with the ccas Energy Efficiency program, but we cant help but think about what the next generation of Energy Efficiency program
Now about our Energy Future moving forward, trying to look at one of the ideas thats come forward in terms of what we could use as a region are some incentives to actually move towards new Building Construction that is not just Energy Efficient by also is a noncarbon future for these buildings, so noncombustion heating systems, the boilers wouldnt be boilers any more, they would be Something Else that we could put in place, and thats a place where i think there could be work that we could enhance through legislation moving forward and has the department of the environment worked on these types of ideas . Yeah, we are very much now looking at updating the rico, which is the Residential Energy conservation ordinance, we may be coming back to you hopefully soon with some measures for existing buildings. When we talk about new construction were doing a lot of work now looking at the roof, what do we want to do about green roofs and solar, looking at electric vehicles, electrification, this
Management time and our marketing dollars by limiting the amount of marketing we need to do and on site visits. They avoid stranding the inaudible increasing energy costs and putting our businesses at risk every day we hear this on all of our site visits. We also would like to see continued job creation in the manufacturing, sale and installation of Energy Efficient technology. We have the vision. The next step is to work with our partners like the puc to determine a timeline. We have a powerful future here. We believe cca will help San Francisco bridge our Current Energy efficiency work and the promise of clean renewable future. We will continue to lead not only with our innovative ideas but also innovative methods of implementation. Thank you very much. Thank you. Thank you for your presentation. We have questions from the committee. Supervisor mar. Can i just i would love to just bookend this with some final thoughts, would it be okay . Please. I want to thank you, kathleen, that wa
Because they have a lot of needs for ventilation and other things through that roof top, so theres a lot of competing needs plus the size and the density of the energy needed may mean its difficult to replace a natural gas fired boiler with other technology unless we can find some other source for the gas, like bio gas. Its easier to do in low rise buildings. Thank you. Colleagues, any other comments or questions . Vice chair cruz. Thank you. I just want to thank the department of the environment for coming here today. This was something that i was really excited about, to see the presentation and i spoke with mr. Broomhead before, giving me some ideas on what are the possibilities out there. And what i understand is that there is a whole host of ideas and programs and efficiencies that can be made available for clean power sf customers that they just would not have had the opportunity to see even to find funding for or to package the programs together in a way that they just couldnt g
Comment and we can have a motion to approve the minutes. Motion from commissioner cruz, seconded by commissioner breed and well take that without objection. Next item, please. Item no. 3 is a Community Choice aggregation activities report. A is timeline for program launch, b is status on proceedings of California Public Utilities Commission and c is presentation from department of the environment. We have a few city staff who are here, well start off with jason fried, lafco director. Jason fried, wanted to suggest we do these items a little out of order and start with 3c, the presentation from the department of the environment. We have staff here and once they are through we can have them leave and once we can go to the ms. Hale thank you, good afternoon, commissioners, debbie raffell, director of the department of the environment. It is with great excitement and gratitude that we are here today to talk about work we have been doing for the last 15 years in our Department Around Energy